openoffice-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Pedro F. Giffuni" <>
Subject Re: [Repo] SVN ETA? (was Re: Request for comments: Community Wiki Services web page.)
Date Wed, 10 Aug 2011 15:26:38 GMT

--- On Wed, 8/10/11, Marcus (OOo) <> wrote:
> >
> > Let me try to recap the consensus so far. I was on
> vaction for two
> > weeks, so I was not involved in all discussions.
> >
> > A full conversion hg ->  svn for the trunk
> repo and all cws is considered
> > to be impossible, so all conversions will happen on
> the trunk repo only.
> >
> > It was mentioned that preserving history looks hard,
> so most of us
> > agreed to move over the tip from the trunk repo into
> svn only, without
> > history.
> I had the impression that we agreed on
> a) moving the OOO340m1 tip into ASF SVN and to loose
> history, so that we can start with further improvements
> very fast and

Lose ALL history? I was under the impression we wanted to
keep at least keep the trunk history in SVN.
> b) to keep the complete OOo HG repo in apache-extras to
> keep the CWS developments but also to keep the repo
> history for reference.

This is correct and is done already.
> So, at the end there is indeed a way to keep every data +
> history but also to start with new developments in ASF
> SVN.

I suggest that we do the CWS merge (only branch merging, no
new code) in apache-extras. Doing it there is better than just
committing a big patch in subversion and this gives a bit more
time for the SVN conversion (if it's going on).


View raw message