Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-incubator-ooo-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-ooo-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 017A27708 for ; Tue, 26 Jul 2011 18:16:37 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 78255 invoked by uid 500); 26 Jul 2011 18:16:36 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-ooo-dev-archive@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 78026 invoked by uid 500); 26 Jul 2011 18:16:35 -0000 Mailing-List: contact ooo-dev-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 78018 invoked by uid 99); 26 Jul 2011 18:16:35 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 26 Jul 2011 18:16:35 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of apache@robweir.com designates 66.147.249.253 as permitted sender) Received: from [66.147.249.253] (HELO oproxy1-pub.bluehost.com) (66.147.249.253) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with SMTP; Tue, 26 Jul 2011 18:16:28 +0000 Received: (qmail 3040 invoked by uid 0); 26 Jul 2011 18:16:06 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO host181.hostmonster.com) (74.220.207.181) by oproxy1.bluehost.com with SMTP; 26 Jul 2011 18:16:06 -0000 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=default; d=robweir.com; h=MIME-Version:Date:Message-ID:Subject:From:To:Content-Type:X-Identified-User; b=zYh7HBDjj9g8Df3F/vMniso9tSshimO7i9jpmLFuefuqutuCVKBuDonJLT1/OeEHaPxrICRMRh4kjdZC7LGV2VO857iwSfJGkvW3qzgr8G/q13UbrHcpT1wsW6gLOwCR; Received: from mail-gy0-f175.google.com ([209.85.160.175]) by host181.hostmonster.com with esmtpsa (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128) (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1QlmAo-0000hX-Cz for ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org; Tue, 26 Jul 2011 12:16:06 -0600 Received: by gyd12 with SMTP id 12so475836gyd.6 for ; Tue, 26 Jul 2011 11:16:05 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.101.208.1 with SMTP id k1mr5484696anq.114.1311704165488; Tue, 26 Jul 2011 11:16:05 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.100.13.19 with HTTP; Tue, 26 Jul 2011 11:16:05 -0700 (PDT) Date: Tue, 26 Jul 2011 14:16:05 -0400 Message-ID: Subject: Wikipedia's "Rate this page" From: Rob Weir To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Identified-User: {1114:host181.hostmonster.com:robweirh:robweir.com} {sentby:smtp auth 209.85.160.175 authed with apache@robweir.com} X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Don't know if you've noticed this new feature that has recently been rolled out. Scroll down to the bottom of this, or any other Wikipedia page: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/OpenOffice.org Readers are invited to rate the page on completeness, objectivity, etc. Presumably this information is aggregated and in the future can guide editors towards the pages that need the most work. Would an approach like this have any benefit for our website, for doc, tutorials, etc.? -Rob