Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-incubator-ooo-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-ooo-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 695797FC8 for ; Sat, 30 Jul 2011 06:29:54 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 38903 invoked by uid 500); 30 Jul 2011 06:29:52 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-ooo-dev-archive@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 38668 invoked by uid 500); 30 Jul 2011 06:29:41 -0000 Mailing-List: contact ooo-dev-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 38650 invoked by uid 99); 30 Jul 2011 06:29:39 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 30 Jul 2011 06:29:39 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=5.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of dennis.hamilton@acm.org designates 75.98.160.130 as permitted sender) Received: from [75.98.160.130] (HELO a2s15.a2hosting.com) (75.98.160.130) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 30 Jul 2011 06:29:31 +0000 Received: from 63-226-210-225.tukw.qwest.net ([63.226.210.225] helo=Astraendo) by a2s15.a2hosting.com with esmtpa (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Qn32s-00069p-2U; Sat, 30 Jul 2011 02:29:10 -0400 Reply-To: From: "Dennis E. Hamilton" To: "'Greg Stein'" Cc: References: <013601cc4d99$63183e50$2948baf0$@acm.org> <00fc01cc4e0b$b3bb11d0$1b313570$@acm.org> In-Reply-To: Subject: RE: Q: Notices in Code - Answered and Thanks Y'All Date: Fri, 29 Jul 2011 23:29:35 -0700 Organization: NuovoDoc Message-ID: <007001cc4e82$0de7ecc0$29b7c640$@acm.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 14.0 Thread-Index: AQLq3ViEugmcgmRk4Vzw7d6jrmmYqwEuw28oApIFgk0CPAdf2pKXXD6w Content-Language: en-us X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - a2s15.a2hosting.com X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - incubator.apache.org X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [47 12] / [47 12] X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - acm.org X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org I'm not going to dig up the relevant texts. Here's a recap: 1. I noticed that you put Apache notices in each and every text file you = have committed to the ooo SVN. 2. I asked if that was a requirement or simply your personal practice? = I must not have asked it very well. Here is the very top of my message: "Simple version of the question: Is your putting notices on everything your personal practice or is it a requirement that this be done with all textual artifacts where notices are possible?" 3. Rob (not you) answered my message by pointing out where the = instructions for use of the Apache License by Apache authors were. 4. On Rob's reply, below Rob's link to those instructions, you added = in-line, "Right. Whenever possible." 5. I took that as my answer. And somewhere on this thread I thought = I'd said as much. 6. I posted the little ditty about getting answers to questions not = asked because the thread kept accumulating more advice after my question = was already answered to my satisfaction. There was nothing wrong with = the answers. They just weren't responsive to my question. (And I was a = little put out that the responders thought I didn't know that already. = I took that as a reflection on the poor quality of my question as well, = that it was taken as ignorance that I do not possess. I have other = ignorance, but not that.) The oddness about the place of your response for me was because you put = it below Rob's response and not directly after my question, so I had to = interpolate. =20 I have a good-enough answer. If that is still obtuse for you, let's = just forget the whole thing, OK? - Dennis PS: I just added Copyright and Apache License notices everywhere I could = in the SVN of my project, just the way you do in .txt files, .sh (or = .bat in my case), etc. I did it while downloading a new version of some = software that takes over 6 GB total. Now I think I'll start reading = Jack McDevitt's "Echo" while I am waiting for more of the download set = to complete. -----Original Message----- From: Greg Stein [mailto:gstein@gmail.com]=20 Sent: Friday, July 29, 2011 21:56 To: dennis.hamilton@acm.org Cc: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org Subject: RE: Q: Notices in Code - Answered and Thanks Y'All Geezus. You are continuing to be obtuse. I have *no* idea what you're = talking about. On Jul 29, 2011 9:21 AM, "Dennis E. Hamilton" = wrote: > Greg, your short reply was completely sufficient. >=20 > It was all I needed and it answered the question that I asked.=20 >=20 > It was a little odd that you answered it where you did, but I got the = answer. >=20 > The question was about a practice that I observed you following, not = about ALv2 nor the difference between work contributed to Apache and = when contributing work to a non-Apache project under an ALv2 license. = The gist of my note is about the apparent social dynamics of answers to = unasked questions. I've been noticing how often that happens on other = dev lists I follow and I was amused that it happened here with a = question I asked. >=20 > - Dennis >=20 > -----Original Message----- > From: Greg Stein [mailto:gstein@gmail.com]=20 > Sent: Friday, July 29, 2011 02:36 > To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org > Subject: RE: Q: Notices in Code - Answered and Thanks Y'All >=20 > It seems there is some kind of subtext here, but it is so obtuse that = I have > no idea what is going on. >=20 > So: was my short reply useful, or not? >=20 > And note that my reply was also given as an augment to Rob's link to = source > header application. >=20 > Dennis: be clear; *what* are you trying to say? I cannot read *any* = takeaway > from below. >=20 > -g > On Jul 28, 2011 7:44 PM, "Dennis E. Hamilton" = > wrote: >> There's a story, perhaps apocryphal (i.e., like the bicycle shed = story), > about Tom Watson approaching a Sr.VP for Human Resources in a hallway = and > asking how college students get summer jobs at IBM. The Sr.VP said = he'd get > back to him. >> >> I will say no more. You might imagine how this went South when the = only > thing Watson wanted to know was to what to tell a neighbor whose son = wanted > to apply for one of those jobs. The more experience you have in = corporate > life (and on some developer lists), you can imagine where this might = have > ended up instead. (Serious analysis and study, crash project, charts, > slides, big conference room presentation, etc.) >> >> However, Greg answered my question in his first reply on this thread: >> >> "Right. Whenever possible." >> >> It is useful to learn about RAT and the committers tools, although it > doesn't apply to my situation. My question was not about how to make = the > notice, it was about how Greg seemed to stamp it onto every textual = artifact > he committed to SVN. >> >> Two lessons: >> 1. I need to be careful about answering the (actual) question being = asked. >> 2. When I ask questions, I need to be very clear what the question is = (and > still risking that won't be the question answered). >> >> - Dennis >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Shane Curcuru [mailto:asf@shanecurcuru.org] >> Sent: Thursday, July 28, 2011 19:19 >> To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org >> Subject: Re: Q: Notices in Code >> >> Apache RAT is in the incubator, and some projects use it to do source >> code license checking and the like: >> >> http://incubator.apache.org/rat/ >> >> Note that the committers repository has two directories with other, = much >> simpler (but possibly useful) tools about checking or changing = licenses >> or other standard chunks of text in masses of source code: >> >> https://svn.apache.org/repos/private/committers >> >> /relicense >> and >> /tools >> >> - Shane >> >=20