openoffice-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Jens-Heiner Rechtien <>
Subject Re: Subversion history (was: Wiki, SVN, other resources)
Date Fri, 17 Jun 2011 21:15:49 GMT
On 06/17/2011 10:12 PM, Greg Stein wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 17, 2011 at 08:55, Jens-Heiner Rechtien<>  wrote:
>> ...
>> The OOO340 codeline contains the DEV300_m106 tag so OOO340 is definitely
>> branched of DEV300_m106, which is incidentally also the very last milestone
>> we did on DEV300. Using m103 does not make sense at all. But if the grant
>> includes all the "work in progress" in the CWSs we can easily use OOO340m1
>> as staring point, as it just contains a few more recent CWS integrations.
>> It's almost equivalent as to using DEV300 m103 and redoing the latest
>> integrations.
> The grant only includes the files that Sam listed. ie. none of the CWSs.
> It would be best to specify the exact list of files we need, including
> those from CWSs. Present that final list to Oracle, and go.
> Note that we probably want to avoid going back a second time, if at
> all possible. Hauling in Oracle Legal to review our request probably
> won't be very workable (say) next year :-P

Tell me about it :-)

It's just that DEV300 m103 is a kinda strange milestone to base a grant 
on it. Does someone know why it's DEV300 m103 and not DEV300 m106 or 
OOO340 m1?


Jens-Heiner Rechtien

View raw message