Return-Path: X-Original-To: archive-asf-public-internal@cust-asf2.ponee.io Delivered-To: archive-asf-public-internal@cust-asf2.ponee.io Received: from cust-asf.ponee.io (cust-asf.ponee.io [163.172.22.183]) by cust-asf2.ponee.io (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4A26A200C14 for ; Tue, 7 Feb 2017 15:51:52 +0100 (CET) Received: by cust-asf.ponee.io (Postfix) id 48AAA160B4B; Tue, 7 Feb 2017 14:51:52 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: archive-asf-public@cust-asf.ponee.io Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by cust-asf.ponee.io (Postfix) with SMTP id 9377C160B3E for ; Tue, 7 Feb 2017 15:51:51 +0100 (CET) Received: (qmail 3107 invoked by uid 500); 7 Feb 2017 14:51:50 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@opennlp.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@opennlp.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@opennlp.apache.org Received: (qmail 3089 invoked by uid 99); 7 Feb 2017 14:51:50 -0000 Received: from pnap-us-west-generic-nat.apache.org (HELO spamd2-us-west.apache.org) (209.188.14.142) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 07 Feb 2017 14:51:50 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by spamd2-us-west.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at spamd2-us-west.apache.org) with ESMTP id E847C1A048A for ; Tue, 7 Feb 2017 14:51:49 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at spamd2-us-west.apache.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: 2.379 X-Spam-Level: ** X-Spam-Status: No, score=2.379 tagged_above=-999 required=6.31 tests=[DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=2, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, RCVD_IN_SORBS_SPAM=0.5, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=disabled Authentication-Results: spamd2-us-west.apache.org (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com Received: from mx1-lw-us.apache.org ([10.40.0.8]) by localhost (spamd2-us-west.apache.org [10.40.0.9]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id HFBAL33_zhOE for ; Tue, 7 Feb 2017 14:51:48 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-oi0-f51.google.com (mail-oi0-f51.google.com [209.85.218.51]) by mx1-lw-us.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at mx1-lw-us.apache.org) with ESMTPS id 96FA85F201 for ; Tue, 7 Feb 2017 14:51:48 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-oi0-f51.google.com with SMTP id u143so65722460oif.3 for ; Tue, 07 Feb 2017 06:51:48 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=azwILjhfHMFA7cFcNIQ6bvhjxAC+t1HMnghUOHroTFI=; b=lhnkiZjCLDKLGBnA55hl+SSErNA4vSI31okqVk6SxpEzbNYo8hejbBLtOlYy6heHHD LLv4ZfkJgIZoWUZufsh2vgAh//zNnalO5dBbUwNNvuPBHEfaVqTKx1CrUG69DzCw+0Jr UZYTU0leWZEE9G1sZLnaBdBM1gveElqjq1lUj3x1ekEnbDaqv6BfSaAGTT7ZdNc/otzp PiMgtHcjbyMwRIEC+QO8cJWrI5xPoY/CtQxmU4/cir0U2ePh9m7gPz0GztX/uXgDHTCE FOAtzSCFSi9e+jOCmdr8Rcbd8SyXtEXsPAlBxVtqfOomD/ZNFzYJHdtZn2laqJ+8vHTw nAXw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to; bh=azwILjhfHMFA7cFcNIQ6bvhjxAC+t1HMnghUOHroTFI=; b=rlJQWIRVOdufIvMzcessbU8xBI7qO80/PlD4RoGYVWh81NG+sqjnqNgR7mvPD/KD1I +NanaDkvRRy0p1fn9eKXLuybwHC+e3Jm5biLXTLnlMpvn+eDB5a64WYMSaKUM4c+3Svy wY06t5BPyZKyfUWKN67EM/snOcVUN9SDZGxwKra/Xj7Uiz+LCI4cObSVeEheSB0OjQwz hENOBVOdylFgs53IDcRGeSbmGZWFk3UWerIlJfLB52ATR6JnkM3BnDQO974LLvrO8lYh tz0ovjvaVrxaKNODsVelq5osdfqHH03r4i6nqcTYVvzWt6mbp1G2DtKKhSif27e8xTDy Xz6Q== X-Gm-Message-State: AMke39nRvJGNurCc3VURyCt+dNcYXn7tadNwz9Qzbm9rfvYPGYtm8K8+SXnCI4npuKPz9meqCixrACJMnW0r+A== X-Received: by 10.202.80.77 with SMTP id e74mr8535157oib.156.1486479107994; Tue, 07 Feb 2017 06:51:47 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.182.114.194 with HTTP; Tue, 7 Feb 2017 06:51:47 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <74845922-9BB6-4377-9CC6-1047EE8F0E9D@nih.gov> References: <1486402832.2628.1.camel@gmail.com> <74845922-9BB6-4377-9CC6-1047EE8F0E9D@nih.gov> From: Damiano Porta Date: Tue, 7 Feb 2017 15:51:47 +0100 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Name Finder trainer default settings To: dev@opennlp.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a113d6e7232bb390547f1e392 archived-at: Tue, 07 Feb 2017 14:51:52 -0000 --001a113d6e7232bb390547f1e392 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable I have good results with perceptron, but +1 for CRF 2017-02-07 15:42 GMT+01:00 Russ, Daniel (NIH/CIT) [E] : > Hi J=C3=B6rn, > > > > I think the best entity recognition systems use CRF=E2=80=99s. At som= e point > we might want to consider adding them. As you know, ME classifiers suffe= r > from label bias problem (see Lafferty et. al edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=3D1162&context=3Dcis_papers>.) CRF=E2=80= =99s deal > with that issue. I believe that perceptrons suffer from the same problem= . > If you think the results are better, I have no problem. I think that our > long-term goal should be to add a CRF, and make it the default for the > NameFinder. > > > > Daniel > > > > > > On 2/6/17, 12:40 PM, "Joern Kottmann" wrote: > > > > Hello all, > > > > I would like to propose to switch the default training algorithm from > > maxent gis to perceptron for the Name Finder. In all the data sets I > > tried perceptron performs better than maxent gis and I believe that > > would be a much more sensible default. > > > > A user can always override the default by providing the algorithms > > parameter for training. > > > > What do you think? > > > > J=C3=B6rn > > > > > --001a113d6e7232bb390547f1e392--