opennlp-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Aliaksandr Autayeu <aliaksa...@autayeu.com>
Subject Re: Word Sense Disambiguation
Date Mon, 16 Feb 2015 15:29:30 GMT
Jörn, to avoid ambiguity in case you addressed me to propose a WSD
interface. I'd prefer Anthony to come up with a proposal, because he is
closer to the multiple WSD algorithms that would be nice to include in the
analysis.

Aliaksandr

On 16 February 2015 at 15:19, Joern Kottmann <kottmann@gmail.com> wrote:

> On Sat, 2015-02-14 at 11:09 +0100, Aliaksandr Autayeu wrote:
> > Since you're perhaps deeper in this that others you seem to be the
> > best
> > candidate to make a proposal, to check the state of the art algorithms
> > and
> > devise general enough interface for all or most of them. One way could
> > be
> > to see what the algorithms typically require, how diverse are sources
> > of
> > senses (WordNet alone has multiple different interfaces to access it),
> > which options do the algorithms take and start somewhere there to see
> > that
> > the interface is flexible enough to accommodate that diversity, has
> > ability
> > to do some built-in checks (such as detecting the case of algorithm
> > trained
> > on one source of senses working with another, or perhaps algorithm
> > relying
> > on a relation which is missing in the sense source) and be similar to
> > the
> > rest of OpenNLP. We might even end up with two interfaces (e.g. for
> > sense
> > provider and for WSD itself).
> >
> > What do you think about this way?
>
> Please propose an interface. We will discuss it here on the list.
>
> Jörn
>
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message