Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-incubator-opennlp-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-opennlp-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 3A6EE9B45 for ; Wed, 15 Feb 2012 09:33:07 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 58658 invoked by uid 500); 15 Feb 2012 09:33:07 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-opennlp-dev-archive@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 58623 invoked by uid 500); 15 Feb 2012 09:33:07 -0000 Mailing-List: contact opennlp-dev-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: opennlp-dev@incubator.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list opennlp-dev@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 58615 invoked by uid 99); 15 Feb 2012 09:33:07 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 15 Feb 2012 09:33:07 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.5 required=5.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of kottmann@gmail.com designates 209.85.210.47 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.210.47] (HELO mail-pz0-f47.google.com) (209.85.210.47) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 15 Feb 2012 09:33:01 +0000 Received: by daln34 with SMTP id n34so651647dal.6 for ; Wed, 15 Feb 2012 01:32:41 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=0AcjXPVCOYoItkv3lnUYThiCcul/bS2AjiADAMSn7u0=; b=CRc4M2vW6tdMRP1ZV6rtgMABDs+UE4oOrA2asnW2cu4wfTB5J9gk5CBka0fAhe/+e3 msgeh+LPgglNsJWRwde2wA9iICcbpKzhFgawUouKWOC60HS8O2ZpAmtPU7HyU/dWDN4R Li4lVu/FD57BwpxrpCk9t2I5YFOOFMcr4CbxU= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.68.232.103 with SMTP id tn7mr1785052pbc.74.1329298361620; Wed, 15 Feb 2012 01:32:41 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.68.54.100 with HTTP; Wed, 15 Feb 2012 01:32:41 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <4F3B7723.5040107@averbis.com> References: <4F3B7723.5040107@averbis.com> Date: Wed, 15 Feb 2012 10:32:41 +0100 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Intermediate Release From: Joern Kottmann To: opennlp-dev@incubator.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=047d7b33d8d8a518d404b8fd64ae --047d7b33d8d8a518d404b8fd64ae Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable We usually need a bit longer to get a release out. Sorry. I would take the EOS patch and apply it to the 1.5.2 version. After you did that you should train and evaluate the Sentence Detector to ensure it is working ok. You can also take the trunk version, which is usually stable and in a good condition. Before you ship it, I would train and evaluate all the components you use, then it is very unlikely that you will hit a big bug afterwards. The best way to figure out how to help is to have a look at jira. There are open issues for almost any component. Is there an area where you would like to work on? We are also always looking for format support for a new corpus, e.g in the bio or medical domain. J=C3=B6rn On Wed, Feb 15, 2012 at 10:13 AM, Katrin Tomanek wrote: > Hi, > > I've been asking before about the plans for the next opennlp release. The > answer I got was that it's not planned yet, when (and whether) to release > 1.5.3 (maybe, there will be a 1.6. as the next release). > > > My situation now is the following: I need a release by the end of next > month (since we are using opennlp in a commercial product where we are > having a deadline). I cannot use 1.5.2 (because of the EOS symbol problem= s > that are fixed in the trunk). > > So, I am planning to build a transitional release in our company-internal > repository. I am just wondering what would be the best time to do so.... = I > see that currently, there are still issues on the POS Tagger factory. Abo= ut > other problems I am currently not aware... > > Any hints about when to build such a transitional release which I could > consider "kind-of" stable? > > Thanks, > Katrin > > P.S.: let me know if there are currently any issues I could be working > on... > --047d7b33d8d8a518d404b8fd64ae--