opennlp-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Jörn Kottmann <kottm...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: [jira] [Commented] (OPENNLP-226) Evaluators should allow tools to register a misclassified report interface
Date Wed, 10 Aug 2011 09:23:51 GMT
On 8/10/11 2:10 AM, william.colen@gmail.com wrote:
> I think it would be much better, but we have different sample classes (one
> for each tool) and no common parent. As far as I can see there is no way to
> compare two samples without knowing the tool and it makes harder to
> implement the monitor. That is way I avoided using the sample itself and
> added 3 methods that covers different kinds of samples we have.

Ups, accidentally replied to the issues list.

You need to know the sample class, and since they do not have a common
parent you always need to write some custom code to extract the knowledge
from them. This code we have to write somewhere, now it is in the individual
evaluators, but it could also be moved to command line monitors.
Extracting this information in the evaluators itself, might be a bit 
easier since
it is going through the samples anyway.

So going down this road might be a bit more work, but to me it looks 
like the
solution is also much more useable.

Jörn

Mime
View raw message