Mailing-List: contact opennlp-dev-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: opennlp-dev@incubator.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of kottmann@gmail.com designates
 74.125.82.175 as permitted sender)
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
        h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references
         :in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding;
        b=YbtYDNa4q3ZhSxHroEcvZQnjctk7Fz2gymGXnTwmmVEew1Gwn6riLW3A724EYRNwdx
         9RqnGhGWGnJ9NI6bB4GfUSaOQuoFbRl73ytJEbe1gRtWgvbC42Tj1ojkA4X/A13CwXSY
         pZQDgkC+WT3QbXFDXauRRJCnXC3p8wh/QL32Y=
Message-ID: <4D920F73.9080301@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 29 Mar 2011 18:57:23 +0200
From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?J=F6rn_Kottmann?= <kottmann@gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; en-US;
 rv:1.9.2.15) Gecko/20110303 Thunderbird/3.1.9
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: opennlp-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: OpenNLP 1.5.1 Release Candidate 5
References: <4D872497.4000008@gmail.com>
 <815290D2-3474-4B1F-A234-BF42D9404532@apache.org>
In-Reply-To: <815290D2-3474-4B1F-A234-BF42D9404532@apache.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit

On 3/29/11 6:03 PM, Grant Ingersoll wrote:
> Overall, artifacts look good.
>
>  From a packaging standpoint:
>
> * NOTICE.txt needs the JWNL copyright statement in it per the terms of BSD
>
> * UIMA reference should also be in the NOTICE (as should any other dependency that requires it).  Technically, since we aren't redistributing the library, I don't think need to, but I think we should for completeness.
>
> How come the UIMA stuff isn't in the binary?  Just curious.
There are different ways to run OpenNLP in UIMA, one is to create the 
sample pear
and start it up in the uima document analyzer, but that one is 
distributed with UIMA.

Anyway I will fix the NOTICE file as suggested by Grant for RC 6, I hope 
we are then
ready to release, from the testing front everything looks good, expect a 
few minor tests
which should still be done. I am a little worried about the UIMA 
training support, since
I do not have real test data for it, but I believe it is in a good state 
(which doesn't mean it really is).
Anyway the UIMA training support was released like that before, and we 
might postpone proper testing
to our next release (I know that doesn't sounds nice).

J�rn