From user-return-22328-archive-asf-public=cust-asf.ponee.io@openmeetings.apache.org  Sat Jun 27 12:34:07 2020
Return-Path: <user-return-22328-archive-asf-public=cust-asf.ponee.io@openmeetings.apache.org>
X-Original-To: archive-asf-public@cust-asf.ponee.io
Delivered-To: archive-asf-public@cust-asf.ponee.io
Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [207.244.88.153])
	by mx-eu-01.ponee.io (Postfix) with SMTP id 35B36180621
	for <archive-asf-public@cust-asf.ponee.io>; Sat, 27 Jun 2020 14:34:07 +0200 (CEST)
Received: (qmail 16833 invoked by uid 500); 27 Jun 2020 12:34:06 -0000
Mailing-List: contact user-help@openmeetings.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:user-help@openmeetings.apache.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:user-unsubscribe@openmeetings.apache.org>
List-Post: <mailto:user@openmeetings.apache.org>
List-Id: <user.openmeetings.apache.org>
Reply-To: user@openmeetings.apache.org
Delivered-To: mailing list user@openmeetings.apache.org
Received: (qmail 16821 invoked by uid 99); 27 Jun 2020 12:34:06 -0000
Received: from pnap-us-west-generic-nat.apache.org (HELO spamd1-us-west.apache.org) (209.188.14.142)
    by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 27 Jun 2020 12:34:06 +0000
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by spamd1-us-west.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at spamd1-us-west.apache.org) with ESMTP id B43D6C022B
	for <user@openmeetings.apache.org>; Sat, 27 Jun 2020 12:34:05 +0000 (UTC)
X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at spamd1-us-west.apache.org
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 0
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0 tagged_above=-999 required=6.31
	tests=[DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1,
	DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.2, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001,
	SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=disabled
Authentication-Results: spamd1-us-west.apache.org (amavisd-new);
	dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mx1-he-de.apache.org ([10.40.0.8])
	by localhost (spamd1-us-west.apache.org [10.40.0.7]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
	with ESMTP id v-1OzZ2rs3CC for <user@openmeetings.apache.org>;
	Sat, 27 Jun 2020 12:34:04 +0000 (UTC)
Received-SPF: Pass (mailfrom) identity=mailfrom; client-ip=2a00:1450:4864:20::42f; helo=mail-wr1-x42f.google.com; envelope-from=zurcamos@gmail.com; receiver=<UNKNOWN> 
Received: from mail-wr1-x42f.google.com (mail-wr1-x42f.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::42f])
	by mx1-he-de.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at mx1-he-de.apache.org) with ESMTPS id CED957F58D
	for <user@openmeetings.apache.org>; Sat, 27 Jun 2020 12:34:03 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by mail-wr1-x42f.google.com with SMTP id o11so11997905wrv.9
        for <user@openmeetings.apache.org>; Sat, 27 Jun 2020 05:34:03 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=20161025;
        h=message-id:subject:from:to:date:in-reply-to:references:mime-version;
        bh=NNtmjx3zNaCPvyRFpasrqlXW5CaF73fPIVQ3PQvpIRQ=;
        b=tGOBeDEDvA901H9IVDQ13IOy2PUjS6pUV3tQaVww8U3pQOD4xNTn6C6Wh7AApu/q4z
         AnQI9uyhAv8t7RgGmPxcs1xd28ba6zSupyRVUp4ydM/7bS1htWG5DYz9aWq/UZb6vJDc
         ctbiabXc6qBrlZqUaI9YhhYdxiFcMULHJ85prvJd6HkEaDeST2ApRE/ufxSSalW566Ip
         HoZNgtOD2DnjW6tnwrMelt7EHwHqAoXJaAGcCUy5wBxdC99DoFyt5o6vSI/FM79slM9p
         ePzT48Tz5PsmFtMS2lBcrpWySsBICm30DUXHHq0mzx96s3cdocE0LhqCLbwlP/2ECrzx
         JdyA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=1e100.net; s=20161025;
        h=x-gm-message-state:message-id:subject:from:to:date:in-reply-to
         :references:mime-version;
        bh=NNtmjx3zNaCPvyRFpasrqlXW5CaF73fPIVQ3PQvpIRQ=;
        b=fEAdfIE43sDAIBHruo0HXk2D4Yuw5PYvWY7gAw/WSx4voo5/hLN6kBb8oK0odFYziY
         VhkFmxzn4dWp2dTVQcDBdF7POIuZ5G57dHf5r7xHOSX/NVjwi56N0KLDpte5lJu+kEju
         4B6PSRb6hvfoY4WwoV/CADDh+oKryhPdg01DWyNQ/KdY5LFioWaeY1ijJ3oLiHFlVTkE
         k48avw4Ct03xAZrYE3+gmRhDxmf+SZ7atseQeaQGS8pvCZPP8iC/V26wCjnNch2V2N68
         Hj0bmcdtCjRszjM+9yBN7vUMlMhKHO9Mcim4WCtOfa68T2AAiRgDZdJNYol8aa5EeiBE
         jsuQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530U1X9y4t/aLn2uXktwUP9moAn+ixHBVoG+XptVlYTbbYKQUMSP
	jZl4H5QV+P1iezn+rx/yaQhuWbauQMw=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxvRLFg0R8qgyZNnd+WsPvUBc5Gf1qeFGIe76gStAYsqG6R/DLO1JXB4vdOWwa95EsJXz9HaQ==
X-Received: by 2002:adf:eb86:: with SMTP id t6mr8954810wrn.166.1593261242905;
        Sat, 27 Jun 2020 05:34:02 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.198.50] ([212.225.176.40])
        by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id v20sm20082410wmh.26.2020.06.27.05.34.01
        for <user@openmeetings.apache.org>
        (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-ECDSA-CHACHA20-POLY1305 bits=256/256);
        Sat, 27 Jun 2020 05:34:02 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <1593261240.2090.1.camel@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Testing Poman on Fedora
From: Alvaro <zurcamos@gmail.com>
To: user@openmeetings.apache.org
Date: Sat, 27 Jun 2020 14:34:00 +0200
In-Reply-To: <1593247977.2068.1.camel@gmail.com>
References: <1593186608.2325.1.camel@gmail.com>
	 <CAJmbs8hJd6F=gqzadxRStD4yy0=rhNdA4P8fzoN6uyxmgD6Bdw@mail.gmail.com>
	 <1593247977.2068.1.camel@gmail.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="=-SsOjS8l3dVSLHBZ/Fa8N"
X-Mailer: Evolution 3.22.6-1+deb9u2 
Mime-Version: 1.0


--=-SsOjS8l3dVSLHBZ/Fa8N
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit


Well Maxim, think that i must explain better. Please permit me.
We are in Ubuntu 18.04 (for exemple) with kernel 4.15.0-76.We make a
normal update-upgrade system, and afterthis we are with kernel 4.15.0-
88.
When i said old kernel i mean 4.15.0-76, and the newwouldbe 4.15.0-88.
Think that this is important to know about "podman" ,'cause if with the
kernel wich podman is installed works right, butwith the older kernel
not...i must wait to see if after updateFedora 32 to a new kernel,
podman continue working rightor not.
Thanks for your patience.

........................

El sáb, 27-06-2020 a las 10:52 +0200, Alvaro escribió:
> Thanks Maxim,
> Podman is a daemon container as docker. It is for Reda Hat, CentOSand
> Fedora.
> It works right.
> 
> ....................
> 
> El sáb, 27-06-2020 a las 15:14 +0700, Maxim Solodovnik escribió:
> > Hello Alvaro,
> > Unfortunately I have no idea what "podman" is :(
> > 
> > I would recommend to use latest system with "native" kernel to
> > achieve best results :)
> > On Fri, 26 Jun 2020 at 22:50, Alvaro <zurcamos@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > Hello Maxim,
> > > 
> > > Am testing "podman" instead "docker" on Fedora 32 and works
> > > right.
> > > 
> > > Also tried on Fedora 31 and got reconnections a lot.
> > > That was strange, 32 ok and 31 not.
> > > 
> > > And the reason was that boot Fedora 31 with the old kernel, after
> > > update.
> > > So boot with the new kernel, with wich 've installed podman, and
> > > then works rigjht without reconnections messages.
> > > 
> > > My questios is; the same thing can happens about docker?
> > > 
> > > Thanks
> > > 
> > > 
> > > .................................
> > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > 
> > -- 
> > Best regards,
> > Maxim
--=-SsOjS8l3dVSLHBZ/Fa8N
Content-Type: text/html; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

<html><head></head><body><div><br></div><div>Well Maxim, think that i must =
explain better. Please permit me.</div><div><br></div><div>We are in Ubuntu=
 18.04 (for exemple) with kernel 4.15.0-76.</div><div>We make a normal upda=
te-upgrade system, and after</div><div>this we are with kernel 4.15.0-88.</=
div><div><br></div><div>When i said old kernel i mean 4.15.0-76, and the ne=
w</div><div>wouldbe 4.15.0-88.</div><div><br></div><div>Think that this is =
important to know about "podman" ,'cause if </div><div>with the kernel wich=
 podman is installed works right, but</div><div>with the older kernel not..=
.i must wait to see if after update</div><div>Fedora 32 to a new kernel, po=
dman continue working right</div><div>or not.</div><div><br></div><div>Than=
ks for your patience.</div><div><br></div><div><br></div><div>.............=
...........</div><div><br></div><div><br></div><div>El s=C3=A1b, 27-06-2020=
 a las 10:52 +0200, Alvaro escribi=C3=B3:</div><blockquote type=3D"cite"><d=
iv>Thanks Maxim,</div><div><br></div><div>Podman is a daemon container as d=
ocker. It is for Reda Hat, CentOS</div><div>and Fedora.</div><div><br></div=
><div>It works right.</div><div><br></div><div><br></div><div>.............=
.......</div><div><br></div><div><br></div><div>El s=C3=A1b, 27-06-2020 a l=
as 15:14 +0700, Maxim Solodovnik escribi=C3=B3:</div><blockquote type=3D"ci=
te"><div dir=3D"ltr">Hello Alvaro,<div><br></div><div>Unfortunately I have =
no idea what "podman" is :(</div><div><br></div><div>I would recommend to u=
se latest system with "native" kernel to achieve best results :)</div></div=
><br><div class=3D"gmail_quote"><div dir=3D"ltr" class=3D"gmail_attr">On Fr=
i, 26 Jun 2020 at 22:50, Alvaro &lt;<a href=3D"mailto:zurcamos@gmail.com">z=
urcamos@gmail.com</a>&gt; wrote:<br></div><blockquote type=3D"cite"><div><d=
iv>Hello Maxim,</div><div><br></div><div>Am testing "podman" instead "docke=
r" on Fedora 32 and works right.</div><div><br></div><div>Also tried on Fed=
ora 31 and got reconnections a lot.</div><div>That was strange, 32 ok and 3=
1 not.</div><div><br></div><div>And the reason was that boot Fedora 31 with=
 the old kernel, after</div><div>update.</div><div>So boot with the new ker=
nel, with wich 've installed podman, and</div><div>then works rigjht withou=
t reconnections messages.</div><div><br></div><div>My questios is; the same=
 thing can happens about docker?</div><div><br></div><div>Thanks</div><div>=
<br></div><div><br></div><div>.................................</div><div><=
br></div><div><br></div></div><br></blockquote></div><br clear=3D"all"><div=
><br></div>-- <br><div dir=3D"ltr" class=3D"gmail_signature"><div dir=3D"lt=
r"><div>Best regards,<br>Maxim</div></div></div>
</blockquote></blockquote></body></html>
--=-SsOjS8l3dVSLHBZ/Fa8N--