Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-openmeetings-user-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-openmeetings-user-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id B4C68102B0 for ; Thu, 21 Nov 2013 17:01:41 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 12622 invoked by uid 500); 21 Nov 2013 17:01:39 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-openmeetings-user-archive@openmeetings.apache.org Received: (qmail 12587 invoked by uid 500); 21 Nov 2013 17:01:39 -0000 Mailing-List: contact user-help@openmeetings.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: user@openmeetings.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list user@openmeetings.apache.org Received: (qmail 12553 invoked by uid 99); 21 Nov 2013 17:01:38 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 21 Nov 2013 17:01:38 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.5 required=5.0 tests=FREEMAIL_REPLY,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of iamtutor.ru@gmail.com designates 209.85.217.169 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.217.169] (HELO mail-lb0-f169.google.com) (209.85.217.169) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 21 Nov 2013 17:01:31 +0000 Received: by mail-lb0-f169.google.com with SMTP id y6so14188lbh.14 for ; Thu, 21 Nov 2013 09:01:10 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references :in-reply-to:content-type; bh=Dc0E6eFLHcW1xT7hDUTbx0PIOIT5TkdZkBdM2qWULVo=; b=oitu9ddvZ81lX3+cDdmalpfntTcsXWES2ueqw8+V0MkHaHbJp7W9aT27WBaciUShJk HyZAHovsJ//6WIRqJhkKh5OR0ZNQaZtNywND81bPTkkz3o35yBOfwLrtknrbD9CXP0+Z Pf6CFg0Rt7fSR200h6sfp3utwLPzj5/vwGw2no0vuWQa1lJO0URlZCx0GEekST5EKEje YEcDlbVnhnMw0hg2gQKw5nhkGHNtRy7o55ifOx9oZxW5nl50rrgB3CayYPUpyvvg/6Mr BV+rg4LilGhoos5i6QAAjEz1RsmBarXh5kUhr4iHTraQW9y17nhBHswa1iZLXR7Ghvui fFUQ== X-Received: by 10.152.115.230 with SMTP id jr6mr1684800lab.45.1385053270737; Thu, 21 Nov 2013 09:01:10 -0800 (PST) Received: from [192.168.0.101] ([176.192.129.136]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id o1sm33491366lah.8.2013.11.21.09.01.09 for (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Thu, 21 Nov 2013 09:01:10 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <528E3C55.20709@gmail.com> Date: Thu, 21 Nov 2013 21:01:09 +0400 From: Sergey User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.1.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: user@openmeetings.apache.org Subject: Re: Weird browser behavior? References: <528CBEB8.7090600@cimpeanu.org> <528E314E.5000706@gmail.com> <528E35E7.7050200@gmail.com> <528E37F2.1080000@gmail.com> <528E3B2D.6010504@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------010901010705050405090106" X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --------------010901010705050405090106 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Ok. Thank you Maxim. Hope there are no bugs in red5 apart from you have written. Sergey. 21.11.2013 20:58, Maxim Solodovnik пишет: > we were testing https+rtmps and screensharing > These two were in plans for 2.2 > > > On Thu, Nov 21, 2013 at 11:56 PM, Sergey > wrote: > > I have removed screensharing from any rooms :)). I do not need > it cause it's veery slow :). Any apart from screensharing? > > 21.11.2013 20:53, Maxim Solodovnik пишет: >> 2.1 and 2.1.1 both using same red5 version (2.1.1 is bugfix release) >> We were able to find scenario breaking OM :) >> Vasiliy might remember the details. >> >> to break everything we just need 2 people and 1 screensharing :) >> >> >> On Thu, Nov 21, 2013 at 11:42 PM, Sergey > > wrote: >> >> Well :)) So your "Latest Official Release" - OM 2.1.1 is >> unstable, cause it uses unstable red5. By the way, i'm >> testing version 2.1 half a year already - 6 months without >> any reboots. 3-4 meetings in a week. Without any bugs. >> Can you tell me, Maxim, which exactly unstable behaviour you >> found in red5? >> >> 21.11.2013 20:36, Maxim Solodovnik пишет: >>> No sure :( >>> It's not so easy to downgrade and test .... >>> >>> >>> On Thu, Nov 21, 2013 at 11:33 PM, Sergey >>> > wrote: >>> >>> Is there any stable version of red5? Any one? :) >>> >>> >>> 21.11.2013 20:24, Maxim Solodovnik пишет: >>>> r4393 (old unstable :) ) >>>> >>>> >>>> On Thu, Nov 21, 2013 at 11:14 PM, Sergey >>>> > >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>> Maxim, I have a question :). >>>> >>>> When I compile source code for OM 2.1 which version >>>> of red5 do I get? Old stable or new one and unstable? >>>> >>>> Sergey. >>>> >>>> >>>> 21.11.2013 7:03, Maxim Solodovnik пишет: >>>>> Unfortunately recent red5 (used in 2.2 and 3.0) >>>>> seems to work differ than previous ones. We >>>>> currently working with red5 team to make its work >>>>> more stable. >>>>> This is why 2.2 is not released yet :( >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On Wed, Nov 20, 2013 at 9:36 PM, Alexei Fedotov >>>>> >>>> > wrote: >>>>> >>>>> Hello Bogdan, >>>>> >>>>> 1. One more useful thing is to clear browser >>>>> cash. Ctrl+shift+R >>>>> More options include reboot; clearing flash cash >>>>> >>>>> 2. You use 3.0.0 SNAPSHOT, not a release - >>>>> this means it can be simply >>>>> broken in one >>>>> way or another. >>>>> >>>>> -- >>>>> With best regards / с наилучшими пожеланиями, >>>>> Alexei Fedotov / Алексей Федотов, >>>>> http://dataved.ru/ >>>>> +7 916 562 8095 >>>>> >>>>> [1] Start using Apache Openmeetings today, >>>>> http://openmeetings.apache.org/ >>>>> [2] Join Alexei Fedotov @linkedin, >>>>> http://ru.linkedin.com/in/dataved/ >>>>> [3] Join Alexei Fedotov @facebook, >>>>> http://www.facebook.com/openmeetings >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On Wed, Nov 20, 2013 at 5:52 PM, Cimpeanu >>>>> Stefan >>>> > wrote: >>>>> > Hello. In one of the planned meetings I've >>>>> setup 2 weeks ago, one of the >>>>> > participants encountered a weird problem. >>>>> > >>>>> > He was able to login, choose the room to >>>>> enter, but after the loading >>>>> > bar, nothing happen. There was no >>>>> audio/video selection popup, or >>>>> > anything at all. The screen would just >>>>> flicker once, like it was joining >>>>> > the room, and then back to the loading bar >>>>> (already loaded). We could >>>>> > see him try several times with a message >>>>> that [] has left the room (no >>>>> > name was shown). >>>>> > >>>>> > I advised him to do updates on browser and >>>>> flash player, he tried with >>>>> > Chrome, FF and IE, all reporting same behavior. >>>>> > >>>>> > I was not able to replicate this on another >>>>> pc, and sadly I could not >>>>> > remote his pc to try figuring out. >>>>> > >>>>> > Based on described behavior, does anyone >>>>> have any idea what might have >>>>> > happen? I could look in logs, but they are >>>>> huge, so I'm not sure what to >>>>> > look for exactly. >>>>> > Installed OM 3.0.0-SNAPSHOT, Revision >>>>> 1538957, with no rproxy or >>>>> > certificates. >>>>> > >>>>> > Regards, Bogdan >>>>> > >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> -- >>>>> WBR >>>>> Maxim aka solomax >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> -- >>>> WBR >>>> Maxim aka solomax >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> WBR >>> Maxim aka solomax >> >> >> >> >> -- >> WBR >> Maxim aka solomax > > > > > -- > WBR > Maxim aka solomax --------------010901010705050405090106 Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Ok. Thank you Maxim. Hope there are no bugs in red5 apart from you have written.

Sergey.


21.11.2013 20:58, Maxim Solodovnik пишет:
we were testing https+rtmps and screensharing
These two were in plans for 2.2


On Thu, Nov 21, 2013 at 11:56 PM, Sergey <iamtutor.ru@gmail.com> wrote:
 I have  removed screensharing from any rooms :)). I do not need it cause it's veery slow :). Any apart from screensharing?

21.11.2013 20:53, Maxim Solodovnik пишет:
2.1 and 2.1.1 both using same red5 version (2.1.1 is bugfix release)
We were able to find scenario breaking OM :)
Vasiliy might remember the details.

to break everything we just need 2 people and 1 screensharing :)


On Thu, Nov 21, 2013 at 11:42 PM, Sergey <iamtutor.ru@gmail.com> wrote:
Well :)) So your "Latest Official Release" - OM 2.1.1 is unstable, cause it uses unstable red5. By the way, i'm testing version 2.1 half a year already - 6 months without any reboots. 3-4 meetings in a week. Without any bugs.
Can you tell me, Maxim, which exactly unstable behaviour you found in red5?

21.11.2013 20:36, Maxim Solodovnik пишет:
No sure :(
It's not so easy to downgrade and test ....


On Thu, Nov 21, 2013 at 11:33 PM, Sergey <iamtutor.ru@gmail.com> wrote:
Is there any stable version of red5? Any one? :)


21.11.2013 20:24, Maxim Solodovnik пишет:
r4393 (old unstable :) )


On Thu, Nov 21, 2013 at 11:14 PM, Sergey <iamtutor.ru@gmail.com> wrote:
Maxim, I have a question :).

When I compile source code for OM 2.1 which version of red5 do I get? Old stable or new one and unstable?

Sergey.


21.11.2013 7:03, Maxim Solodovnik пишет:
Unfortunately recent red5 (used in 2.2 and 3.0) seems to work differ than previous ones. We currently working with red5 team to make its work more stable.
This is why 2.2 is not released yet :(


On Wed, Nov 20, 2013 at 9:36 PM, Alexei Fedotov <alexei.fedotov@gmail.com> wrote:
Hello Bogdan,

1. One more useful thing is to clear browser cash. Ctrl+shift+R
More options include reboot; clearing flash cash

2. You use 3.0.0 SNAPSHOT, not a release - this means it can be simply
broken in one
way or another.

--
With best regards / с наилучшими пожеланиями,
Alexei Fedotov / Алексей Федотов,
http://dataved.ru/
+7 916 562 8095

[1] Start using Apache Openmeetings today, http://openmeetings.apache.org/
[2] Join Alexei Fedotov @linkedin, http://ru.linkedin.com/in/dataved/
[3] Join Alexei Fedotov @facebook, http://www.facebook.com/openmeetings


On Wed, Nov 20, 2013 at 5:52 PM, Cimpeanu Stefan <bogdan@cimpeanu.org> wrote:
> Hello. In one of the planned meetings I've setup 2 weeks ago, one of the
> participants encountered a weird problem.
>
> He was able to login, choose the room to enter, but after the loading
> bar, nothing happen. There was no audio/video selection popup, or
> anything at all. The screen would just flicker once, like it was joining
> the room, and then back to the loading bar (already loaded). We could
> see him try several times with a message that [] has left the room (no
> name was shown).
>
> I advised him to do updates on browser and flash player, he tried with
> Chrome, FF and IE, all reporting same behavior.
>
> I was not able to replicate this on another pc, and sadly I could not
> remote his pc to try figuring out.
>
> Based on described behavior, does anyone have any idea what might have
> happen? I could look in logs, but they are huge, so I'm not sure what to
> look for exactly.
> Installed OM 3.0.0-SNAPSHOT, Revision    1538957, with no rproxy or
> certificates.
>
> Regards, Bogdan
>



--
WBR
Maxim aka solomax




--
WBR
Maxim aka solomax




--
WBR
Maxim aka solomax




--
WBR
Maxim aka solomax




--
WBR
Maxim aka solomax

--------------010901010705050405090106--