Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-openmeetings-user-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-openmeetings-user-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 8A86310DA6 for ; Sat, 20 Jul 2013 23:34:17 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 26835 invoked by uid 500); 20 Jul 2013 23:34:17 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-openmeetings-user-archive@openmeetings.apache.org Received: (qmail 26815 invoked by uid 500); 20 Jul 2013 23:34:17 -0000 Mailing-List: contact user-help@openmeetings.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: user@openmeetings.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list user@openmeetings.apache.org Received: (qmail 26806 invoked by uid 99); 20 Jul 2013 23:34:17 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 20 Jul 2013 23:34:17 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.7 required=5.0 tests=FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT,FREEMAIL_REPLY,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of solomax666@gmail.com designates 209.85.214.177 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.214.177] (HELO mail-ob0-f177.google.com) (209.85.214.177) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 20 Jul 2013 23:34:12 +0000 Received: by mail-ob0-f177.google.com with SMTP id ta17so6746424obb.8 for ; Sat, 20 Jul 2013 16:33:52 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=q9XI5KAKDiP6lGx9oZirxN/sP1Pj9SQ6ONw7kRijMEQ=; b=wj86x7fjGMDsIbLqGG7K5K7HuR7313Ajj7yauQbA1Fy0CW5dn0a73uFU4rz+YMmzc9 uf/+4KOw6wgkyi0e4xLZvy3yh3cZcI3j+N+uXFPBgtMsn8jy6zQrs60TF3dOb28COI57 eZW44aooQ2ZXldNC29XCubfLGuOxii6zuxZ3Odi3axJprTMSdOT1eTS5ANxG8un7TS6v rB9/NXHPabBm04GOm5HfYqRJozPdjQa+Ge6Gv2dQ2YTduDIgeA6LRsAZIqd7eqC+CKsz gNeA85FWAPXQe/SEZapBIGYYtb1u8IwhgT//TczRSZ4wuTh4dB5NVRS+XWjxNQhqb+UG NenQ== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.182.219.166 with SMTP id pp6mr16457857obc.34.1374363232002; Sat, 20 Jul 2013 16:33:52 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.182.16.133 with HTTP; Sat, 20 Jul 2013 16:33:51 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <0E82ADB275D38B45B47335E02A5495B1AD71C97D@POLYLINKEX.polylink.net> References: <0E82ADB275D38B45B47335E02A5495B1AD71C4AA@POLYLINKEX.polylink.net> <67971048-1374321409-cardhu_decombobulator_blackberry.rim.net-1621946947-@b15.c23.bise6.blackberry> <0E82ADB275D38B45B47335E02A5495B1AD71C97D@POLYLINKEX.polylink.net> Date: Sun, 21 Jul 2013 06:33:51 +0700 Message-ID: Subject: =?UTF-8?B?UmU6IOetlOWkjTog562U5aSN77yaIFF1ZXN0aW9ucyBhYm91dCBPcGVubWVldGluZ3M=?= From: Maxim Solodovnik To: Openmeetings user-list Cc: "pccom.frank@gmail.com" Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=089e014945543c6a2204e1f9e048 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --089e014945543c6a2204e1f9e048 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable 1) I'm afraid the bottleneck is bandwidth + client PC computing power. I believe more people can attend the meeting in case not all of them will share their video (like 2-3 presenters and the rest is auditory.) In our tests we were using 20 people simultaniously broadcasting their video 2) We are using red5 as streeming server and all audio/vidoe streams are are awent through the server. 3) Unfortunatelly we have no roadmap with dates for 3.1. I hope we will be able to release it before the end of the year. On Sun, Jul 21, 2013 at 5:52 AM, Feng Jinjun =E5=86=AF=E9=87=91=E5=86=9B wrote: > Thanks for reply. **** > > ** ** > > **1) **With the cluster, can we support more person in one room? ***= * > > **2) **FS means freeswitch. **** > > **3) **I know 3.0 will be released in 3 months, how about 3.1 ? **** > > ** ** > > ** ** > > Thanks **** > > Jinjun**** > > ** ** > > *=E5=8F=91=E4=BB=B6=E4=BA=BA**:* Maxim Solodovnik [mailto:solomax666@gmai= l.com] > *=E5=8F=91=E9=80=81=E6=97=B6=E9=97=B4:* Saturday, July 20, 2013 10:51 PM > *=E6=94=B6=E4=BB=B6=E4=BA=BA:* Openmeetings user-list; pccom.frank@gmail.= com > *=E4=B8=BB=E9=A2=98:* Re: =E7=AD=94=E5=A4=8D=EF=BC=9A Questions about Ope= nmeetings**** > > ** ** > > 1) 20 persons are supported, maybe more can attend but we have not tested > that**** > > 2) I'm not sure what do you mean by FS**** > > 4) OM 3.0.0 will be HTML5 compatible (room still will be in flash). 3.1.0 > room will be HTML5 (audio/video will be in flash). 3.2.0+ will be without > flash (I really hope so)**** > > ** ** > > On Sat, Jul 20, 2013 at 6:56 PM, wrote:**** > > Unsubscribe**** > > Sent from my BlackBerry=C2=AE phone powered by Koodo Mobile=C2=AE.**** > ------------------------------ > > *From: *Feng Jinjun =E5=86=AF=E9=87=91=E5=86=9B **** > > *Date: *Sat, 20 Jul 2013 07:12:59 +0000**** > > *To: *user@openmeetings.apache.org**** > > *ReplyTo: *user@openmeetings.apache.org **** > > *Subject: *Questions about Openmeetings**** > > ** ** > > Hi Experts,**** > > **** > > I have some questions regarding to OM, Can you guys kindly help me out? = * > *** > > **** > > 1. How many person are supported in the same meeting room? I have > ever seen a stress test with OM, only 19 =E2=80=93 20 person are supporte= d, it is > true? **** > > 2. Does OM support bypass the voice and let FS to process the > conference? I know it=E2=80=99s the difference between the BBB and OM.= BBB will > bypass all he voice to FS and let FS to process the conference. **** > > 3. Can you help summarize the difference between the BBB and the > OM? **** > > 4. HTMl5 schedule. I have read the release note of OM 2.1, I found > only admin interface used the HTML5. Also I read sebawagner=E2=80=99s mai= l for 3.0 > proposal. I found the meeting room did not use HTML5. **** > > **** > > **** > > Thanks **** > > Jinjun**** > > > > **** > > ** ** > > -- > WBR > Maxim aka solomax **** > --=20 WBR Maxim aka solomax --089e014945543c6a2204e1f9e048 Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
1) I'm afraid the bottleneck is bandwidth + client PC = computing power. I believe more people can attend the meeting in case not a= ll of them will share their video (like 2-3 presenters and the rest is audi= tory.) In our tests we were using 20 people simultaniously broadcasting the= ir video

2) We are using red5 as streeming server and all audio/vidoe= streams are are awent through the server.

3) Unfo= rtunatelly we have no roadmap with dates for 3.1. I hope we will be able to= release it before the end of the year.


On Sun,= Jul 21, 2013 at 5:52 AM, Feng Jinjun =E5=86=AF=E9=87=91=E5=86=9B <= jinjun.feng@polylink.net> wrote:

Thanks for reply.

=C2=A0

1)=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0 With the cluster, ca= n we support more person in one room?

2)=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0 FS means freeswitch.

3)=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0 I know 3.0 will be r= eleased in 3 months, how about 3.1 ?

=C2=A0

=C2=A0

Thanks

Jinjun

=C2=A0

=E5=8F=91=E4=BB=B6=E4=BA=BA: Maxim Solodovnik [mailto:solomax666@gmail.com]
=E5=8F=91=E9=80=81=E6=97=B6=E9=97=B4: Sa= turday, July 20, 2013 10:51 PM
=E6=94=B6=E4=BB=B6=E4=BA=BA: Openmeeting= s user-list; pcc= om.frank@gmail.com
=E4=B8=BB=E9=A2=98: Re: =E7=AD=94=E5=A4=8D=EF=BC=9A Questions about Openmeetings=

=C2=A0

1) 20 persons are supported, maybe more can attend b= ut we have not tested that

2) I'm not sure what do you mean by FS=

4) OM 3.0.0 will be HTML5 compatible (room still wil= l be in flash). 3.1.0 room will be HTML5 (audio/video will be in flash). 3.= 2.0+ will be without flash (I really hope so)

=C2=A0<= /p>

On Sat, Jul 20, 2013 at 6:56 PM, <pccom.frank@gmail.com> w= rote:

Unsubscribe

Sent from my BlackBerry=C2=AE phone powered by Koodo= Mobile=C2=AE.

From: Feng Jinjun =E5=86=AF=E9=87=91=E5=86=9B <jinjun.feng@polylink.net>

Date: Sat, 20 Jul 2013 07:12:59 +0000<= u>

Subject: Questions about Openmeetings<= u>

=C2=A0

Hi Experts,

=C2=A0

I have some questions regarding to OM, =C2=A0Can you= guys kindly help me out?

=C2=A0

1.=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0 <= /span>How many person are supported in the same meeting room? I have ever s= een a stress test with OM, only 19 =E2=80=93 20 person are supported, it is= true?=C2=A0

2.=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0 <= /span>Does OM support bypass the voice and let FS to process the conference= ? =C2=A0=C2=A0I =C2=A0know it=E2=80=99s the difference between the BBB and = OM.=C2=A0 BBB will bypass all he voice to FS and let FS to process the conf= erence.

3.=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0 <= /span>Can you help summarize the difference between the BBB and the OM?

4.=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0 <= /span>HTMl5 schedule. I have read the release note of OM 2.1, I found only = admin interface used the HTML5. Also I read sebawagner=E2=80=99s mail for 3= .0 proposal. I found the meeting room did not use HTML5.

=C2=A0

=C2=A0

Thanks

Jinjun



=C2=A0

--
WBR
Maxim aka solomax




--
WBR
Maxim= aka solomax
--089e014945543c6a2204e1f9e048--