openmeetings-user mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Feng Jinjun 冯金军 <jinjun.f...@polylink.net>
Subject 答复: 答复: 答复: Questions about Openmeetings
Date Sun, 21 Jul 2013 00:04:49 GMT
In our case, we want to make more students in one room, only one presenter or two share their
slides and video.  Based on my estimation, we need about 400+ students. With one server, I
am afraid it cannot support so much load.
For the second question, it is related with the first question, we want to separate the voice
mixing from OM, which will decrease the server load.

It’s great to get the news 3.1.1 will be released in this year.

Jinjun

发件人: Maxim Solodovnik [mailto:solomax666@gmail.com]
发送时间: Sunday, July 21, 2013 7:34 AM
收件人: Openmeetings user-list
抄送: pccom.frank@gmail.com
主题: Re: 答复: 答复: Questions about Openmeetings

1) I'm afraid the bottleneck is bandwidth + client PC computing power. I believe more people
can attend the meeting in case not all of them will share their video (like 2-3 presenters
and the rest is auditory.) In our tests we were using 20 people simultaniously broadcasting
their video

2) We are using red5 as streeming server and all audio/vidoe streams are are awent through
the server.

3) Unfortunatelly we have no roadmap with dates for 3.1. I hope we will be able to release
it before the end of the year.

On Sun, Jul 21, 2013 at 5:52 AM, Feng Jinjun 冯金军 <jinjun.feng@polylink.net<mailto:jinjun.feng@polylink.net>>
wrote:
Thanks for reply.


1)      With the cluster, can we support more person in one room?

2)      FS means freeswitch.

3)      I know 3.0 will be released in 3 months, how about 3.1 ?





Thanks

Jinjun

发件人: Maxim Solodovnik [mailto:solomax666@gmail.com<mailto:solomax666@gmail.com>]
发送时间: Saturday, July 20, 2013 10:51 PM
收件人: Openmeetings user-list; pccom.frank@gmail.com<mailto:pccom.frank@gmail.com>
主题: Re: 答复: Questions about Openmeetings

1) 20 persons are supported, maybe more can attend but we have not tested that
2) I'm not sure what do you mean by FS
4) OM 3.0.0 will be HTML5 compatible (room still will be in flash). 3.1.0 room will be HTML5
(audio/video will be in flash). 3.2.0+ will be without flash (I really hope so)

On Sat, Jul 20, 2013 at 6:56 PM, <pccom.frank@gmail.com<mailto:pccom.frank@gmail.com>>
wrote:
Unsubscribe
Sent from my BlackBerry® phone powered by Koodo Mobile®.
________________________________
From: Feng Jinjun 冯金军 <jinjun.feng@polylink.net<mailto:jinjun.feng@polylink.net>>
Date: Sat, 20 Jul 2013 07:12:59 +0000
To: user@openmeetings.apache.org<mailto:user@openmeetings.apache.org><user@openmeetings.apache.org<mailto:user@openmeetings.apache.org>>
ReplyTo: user@openmeetings.apache.org<mailto:user@openmeetings.apache.org>
Subject: Questions about Openmeetings

Hi Experts,

I have some questions regarding to OM,  Can you guys kindly help me out?


1.       How many person are supported in the same meeting room? I have ever seen a stress
test with OM, only 19 – 20 person are supported, it is true?

2.       Does OM support bypass the voice and let FS to process the conference?   I  know
it’s the difference between the BBB and OM.  BBB will bypass all he voice to FS and let
FS to process the conference.

3.       Can you help summarize the difference between the BBB and the OM?

4.       HTMl5 schedule. I have read the release note of OM 2.1, I found only admin interface
used the HTML5. Also I read sebawagner’s mail for 3.0 proposal. I found the meeting room
did not use HTML5.





Thanks

Jinjun



--
WBR
Maxim aka solomax



--
WBR
Maxim aka solomax
Mime
View raw message