Mailing-List: contact dev-help@openmeetings.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: dev@openmeetings.apache.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
From: "seba.wagner@gmail.com" <seba.wagner@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 3 May 2016 17:05:29 +1200
Message-ID: <CACeMiA_XR5-AN81RDy6Xw8GjWbpq8WDyKC4G+TP_cvVKDCsZOg@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: GSoC 2016: Status and some concerns regarding caldav4j
To: Maxim Solodovnik <solomax666@gmail.com>, Ankush Mishra <ankushmishra9@gmail.com>
Cc: dev <dev@openmeetings.apache.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a113a38e000e7220531e9106b
archived-at: Tue, 03 May 2016 05:06:00 -0000

--001a113a38e000e7220531e9106b
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8

Hi Maxim,

during the meeting we discussed a few points:

1) I added Ankush and Dima to Jira and assigned the tickets

2) We had a quick chat around Caldav and libraries.
https://github.com/caldav4j
Seems to support it but has a few issues in compiling. That is something we
can fix.
But it is using a deprecated library (http://jakarta.apache.org/slide/).
We would need to lift this to use the library to use
http://jackrabbit.apache.org/ instead. However this has not been done yet.

So the issue is that we need to decide on if we want to do this as part of
GSoC.
This could be a quite significant piece of work. If we added to the scope
of this project it could mean less time in doing any actual OpenMeetings
enhancements.

What do you think?

Thanks,
Sebastian


-- 
Sebastian Wagner
https://twitter.com/#!/dead_lock
seba.wagner@gmail.com

--001a113a38e000e7220531e9106b--