Return-Path: X-Original-To: archive-asf-public-internal@cust-asf2.ponee.io Delivered-To: archive-asf-public-internal@cust-asf2.ponee.io Received: from cust-asf.ponee.io (cust-asf.ponee.io [163.172.22.183]) by cust-asf2.ponee.io (Postfix) with ESMTP id D76EA2009F5 for ; Sun, 8 May 2016 12:05:18 +0200 (CEST) Received: by cust-asf.ponee.io (Postfix) id D5F99160A06; Sun, 8 May 2016 10:05:18 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: archive-asf-public@cust-asf.ponee.io Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by cust-asf.ponee.io (Postfix) with SMTP id 27A7F1609A8 for ; Sun, 8 May 2016 12:05:18 +0200 (CEST) Received: (qmail 95462 invoked by uid 500); 8 May 2016 10:05:17 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@openmeetings.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@openmeetings.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@openmeetings.apache.org Received: (qmail 95450 invoked by uid 99); 8 May 2016 10:05:17 -0000 Received: from pnap-us-west-generic-nat.apache.org (HELO spamd4-us-west.apache.org) (209.188.14.142) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 08 May 2016 10:05:17 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by spamd4-us-west.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at spamd4-us-west.apache.org) with ESMTP id A4070C0593 for ; Sun, 8 May 2016 10:05:16 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at spamd4-us-west.apache.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: 1.198 X-Spam-Level: * X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.198 tagged_above=-999 required=6.31 tests=[DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=2, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=disabled Authentication-Results: spamd4-us-west.apache.org (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com Received: from mx1-lw-eu.apache.org ([10.40.0.8]) by localhost (spamd4-us-west.apache.org [10.40.0.11]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id YUqhyEWweaXD for ; Sun, 8 May 2016 10:05:12 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-qg0-f50.google.com (mail-qg0-f50.google.com [209.85.192.50]) by mx1-lw-eu.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at mx1-lw-eu.apache.org) with ESMTPS id ADAF55F2F0 for ; Sun, 8 May 2016 10:05:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-qg0-f50.google.com with SMTP id f92so76145714qgf.0 for ; Sun, 08 May 2016 03:05:11 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=q9Mh8LXIbbLehOj9u93z5U1V7mnzYHg6X9atKx6WENE=; b=RqtoRw14HneALORmu3xNPos2fTKTv3YspVwkSexrUuUnGUa0x2MpacPrVupLuuxm1H H6YwX/yt18UxrOEKqp17M9JrnRbtgGe6+Ai/zNec7N8RuFIXNJzCMeqawDaLgRPGNx42 HOEodfv7R9L/KaFskIbPXTeYO6nch0NSlOPXpolBBScUl7jGXsB+qzUvuwpVkd6+EpnX n6w/UZf69V2I+Qyrbke9egGG52kOHAz6KaJt00Ur09NrDNU46LWdhJn7QeSQNmMZCmfv oA7l6WFSlOoREwjmN49o406ijWK4t6AjTXd9Cu7mUXbkFOMkLfj4iLs2vRZeWUmvy7nJ PyiQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=q9Mh8LXIbbLehOj9u93z5U1V7mnzYHg6X9atKx6WENE=; b=Spoxcj+zIhd0CbQUz2Kn7PRhOEnLR5jx8IWMFls6SljzpfONsRzl/o5UmL/AYlRD35 gP2LuTTTbZ8EB4LzxH93IHI9RQbB1euCCMNXRgX+WK9UTXf3qqVD8j3ulYTipi9FWu6F 8GhfrOmFC0JehxvzHSooIdG3r0BiiHaJtAIdCu0P8CVgtG+qEfscqP8DLUEsYP9DO+IY cvB9xnRt6UUS4x3g+ZLTYpdNRcxW0uOnmU5RT10rFNdY84d8pr0upec02hBrUtq5IJCJ BTahsaw4SGsG4IftMGtSUh82PPBukeW0N7zM5meM1HoDnRt43I+LKyL3X9CU1T577POZ V65g== X-Gm-Message-State: AOPr4FWgH9Gazpc7h81847nMw4RVlXZEm2uSINQRU9JDD926nW3vRztnGo/a1KaLgJQEGax16awW7SHe0Y9aBg== X-Received: by 10.140.160.135 with SMTP id g129mr22088034qhg.47.1462701905397; Sun, 08 May 2016 03:05:05 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.55.157.202 with HTTP; Sun, 8 May 2016 03:04:46 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: From: "seba.wagner@gmail.com" Date: Sun, 8 May 2016 22:04:46 +1200 Message-ID: Subject: Re: GSoC 2016: Status and some concerns regarding caldav4j To: dev Cc: Ankush Mishra Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a113a5fda7bd07d053251d363 archived-at: Sun, 08 May 2016 10:05:19 -0000 --001a113a5fda7bd07d053251d363 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Hi Maxim, I don't think so. The caldav4j team tried to do the migration for over 1 year now: https://github.com/caldav4j/caldav4j/issues/13 And they still have not succeeded. We can give it a try but I doubt it's that simple. From what I understood in that thread is that JackRabbit APIs are not compatible as it was not build for being re-used or a plugin replacement for Apache Slide. So there will be substantial work to do here. Thx Sebastian 2016-05-08 21:47 GMT+12:00 Maxim Solodovnik : > sure, NP, I can place it into our repo as soon as you feel it's ready :) > > when it will be ready > please send me the URL to the repo and some basic build instructions > > On Sun, May 8, 2016 at 3:45 PM, Ankush Mishra > wrote: > > > Thanks for the response. I'll try to complete by next week. And since the > > library isn't in Maven Central, we'll have to place it in the > OpenMeetings > > repo, as well. > > > > Ankush Mishra > > On 8 May 2016 15:04, "Maxim Solodovnik" wrote: > > > >> Hello Sebastian, > >> > >> usually library replacement is as simple as update pom.xml and perform > >> full text replace of classes/packages > >> seems to be easy > >> > >> I believe this can be done as part of GSOC project without any major > >> effect to the roadmap > >> > >> On Tue, May 3, 2016 at 11:05 AM, seba.wagner@gmail.com < > >> seba.wagner@gmail.com> wrote: > >> > >>> Hi Maxim, > >>> > >>> during the meeting we discussed a few points: > >>> > >>> 1) I added Ankush and Dima to Jira and assigned the tickets > >>> > >>> 2) We had a quick chat around Caldav and libraries. > >>> https://github.com/caldav4j > >>> Seems to support it but has a few issues in compiling. That is > something > >>> we can fix. > >>> But it is using a deprecated library (http://jakarta.apache.org/slide/ > >>> ). > >>> We would need to lift this to use the library to use > >>> http://jackrabbit.apache.org/ instead. However this has not been done > >>> yet. > >>> > >>> So the issue is that we need to decide on if we want to do this as part > >>> of GSoC. > >>> This could be a quite significant piece of work. If we added to the > >>> scope of this project it could mean less time in doing any actual > >>> OpenMeetings enhancements. > >>> > >>> What do you think? > >>> > >>> Thanks, > >>> Sebastian > >>> > >>> > >>> -- > >>> Sebastian Wagner > >>> https://twitter.com/#!/dead_lock > >>> seba.wagner@gmail.com > >>> > >> > >> > >> > >> -- > >> WBR > >> Maxim aka solomax > >> > > > > > -- > WBR > Maxim aka solomax > -- Sebastian Wagner https://twitter.com/#!/dead_lock seba.wagner@gmail.com --001a113a5fda7bd07d053251d363--