openmeetings-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Maxim Solodovnik <solomax...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: [DISCUSSION] 3.1.2 feature list
Date Thu, 14 Apr 2016 11:22:46 GMT
I agree, will create new branch

On Thu, Apr 14, 2016 at 4:10 PM, Peter Dähn <daehn@vcrp.de> wrote:

> Hi Maxim,
>
> I would prefer option 2.
>
> It will be a bit more effort, but I  think there are more advantages.
>
> 1.
>
> 3.1.x will be clear and it need to be like that, if we talk about critical
> issues that might be discovered somehow.
>
> 2.
>
> We also need to take code-signing in account. I suggest to release a new
> version as soon as it is possible to sign the code again. And there is no
> forecast when it is possible.
>
>
>
> And over all, I have no idea how long it takes, to rebuild the rooms.
> Probably we get a few ideas from the community what could be implemented
> and how. Maybe it is a good idea to ask in the user-list for ideas and
> requests, with the goal that this work need to be done just one time...
>
>
> Greetings Peter
>
>
> Am 14.04.2016 um 08:07 schrieb Maxim Solodovnik:
>
>> I would like to continue discussion and get your opinion on how "HTML5
>> features" should be added to the room.
>>
>> I see 3 options
>> 1) development is performed in 3.1.x branch
>> Pros:
>>
>>     - we don't need to maintain additional branch
>>     - dev versions to test can be taken from usual location
>>     - we will "burn the bridge" and next release will contain updated room
>>
>> Cons:
>>
>>     - 3.1.x will be unusable for some period of time
>>     - some well tested features might be broken during merge
>>
>>
>> 2) additional 3.2.x branch is created
>> Pros:
>>
>>     - 3.1.x branch will stay clear and we can release some patch versions
>>
>> Cons:
>>
>>     - we have to maintain 3 branches
>>
>>
>> 3) development is performed in trunk
>> Pros:
>>
>>     - no new branches
>>
>> Cons:
>>
>>     - "OpenLaszlo free" branch is no more "OpenLaszlo free" :(
>>
>>
>> I personally prefer option 1) above, but option 2) might also be OK due to
>> our last 2 releases were not properly signed and we might need to release
>> 3.1.2 without new room ....
>>
>>
>> WDYT?
>>
>> On Tue, Apr 12, 2016 at 1:50 PM, Peter Dähn <daehn@vcrp.de> wrote:
>>
>> ok.. I will try to get a few people here to help me... ;-)
>>>
>>>
>>> Am 12.04.2016 um 07:26 schrieb Maxim Solodovnik:
>>>
>>> Thanks for the response Peter :)
>>>> will start adding HTML5 features to the room :)
>>>> will send requests for testing :)
>>>>
>>>> On Fri, Apr 8, 2016 at 2:54 PM, Peter Dähn <daehn@vcrp.de> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Hi Maxim,
>>>>
>>>>> no help with the list from my site.. It is working I think ;-)
>>>>>
>>>>> 2nd part..
>>>>>
>>>>> I wouldn't say ugly... it is more like "no surprises"... Like using
>>>>> java-applications... you know the colors, button style etc... and more
>>>>> html5 would be one more step to get ride of flash... I would appreciate
>>>>> that...
>>>>>
>>>>> Greetings Peter
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Am 07.04.2016 um 20:11 schrieb Maxim Solodovnik:
>>>>>
>>>>> Hello All,
>>>>>
>>>>>> I currently using this list [1] as the list of features for 3.1.2,
>>>>>> maybe
>>>>>> it
>>>>>> is not perfect and you know how to make it better? :)))
>>>>>> Additionally today I heard "OM room is ugly" :( I can add more HTML5
>>>>>> elements to the room (WebSockets semms to work as expected)
>>>>>>
>>>>>> WDYT?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> [1]
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OPENMEETINGS-853?jql=project%20%3D%20OPENMEETINGS%20AND%20resolution%20%3D%20Unresolved%20AND%20fixVersion%20%3D%203.1.2%20ORDER%20BY%20updated%20DESC%2C%20priority%20DESC
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>


-- 
WBR
Maxim aka solomax

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message