openmeetings-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Ankush Mishra <ankushmish...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: weekly report, gsoc 2016, preparation
Date Tue, 05 Apr 2016 07:33:12 GMT
Thanks for the response, both  Sebastian and Maxim. I'll start the work on
it. I have to look into a couple of things anyway.

Ankush Mishra
On 5 Apr 2016 03:59, "seba.wagner@gmail.com" <seba.wagner@gmail.com> wrote:

> @Ankush: Sure, you can always start early. We can provide you with
> feedback if you share it here.
>
> Thx
> Seb
>
> 2016-04-04 23:05 GMT+12:00 Maxim Solodovnik <solomax666@gmail.com>:
>
>> I, personally believe it's better to start earlier :)
>>
>> On Mon, Apr 4, 2016 at 1:42 PM, Ankush Mishra <ankushmishra9@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Quick question, I was wondering if I could start working on preliminary
>>> things for the CalDAV support. I was thinking of waiting for the GSOC
>>> results to come out on April 22, but would be better if I start now.
>>>
>>> Ankush Mishra
>>> Hi Dmitriy,
>>>
>>> I would not be bothered too much around Wicket. The stuff you are doing
>>> is
>>> pretty much cutting edge JavaScript/browser specific. You do not want to
>>> waste endless amount of time to try to make the JavaScript fit into
>>> Wicket.
>>>
>>> It would be more "nice" to have it also ready to use as a Wicket
>>> component.
>>> But we probably would need to look at your JavaScript and then end up in
>>> trying to create a module or even contribute it to the Apache Wicket
>>> project. That process could be an entire project on its own.
>>>
>>> So yeah, I would be basically fine with a pure JavaScript implementation
>>> and then we try to figure out how to get it into Wicket in a later step.
>>>
>>> However I leave that up to you, whatever suits you/is most efficient to
>>> you.
>>>
>>> But your short term goals sound very useful.
>>>
>>> Regarding nodejs: This technology is currently not part of our stack. Do
>>> we
>>> really need it for the successful implementation of this project ?
>>>
>>> Btw: It might be good if you CC Maxim/Me (seba.wagner@gmail.com)
>>> directly.
>>> Those kind of reviews will be mostly Maxim's and my duty. It's kind of
>>> more
>>> reliable to CC people directly if you already know the ones you need to
>>> poke.
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> Sebastian
>>>
>>> 2016-04-04 10:28 GMT+12:00 Dmitriy - <dima00782@gmail.com>:
>>>
>>> > Hi all.
>>> >
>>> > I've began to investigate in apache wicket and their implementation
>>> webRTC.
>>> > I've started from creating small application with wicket html5 video
>>> tag
>>> > and nodejs server for this purposes.
>>> > I will fix my researches here -
>>> > https://github.com/Dima00782/wicketTraining.
>>> >
>>> > On this week I learnt basics in Wicket and configure nodejs servers -
>>> > stun/turn/signaling.
>>> >
>>> > My short-term plans are to make list of requirements of protocols for
>>> red5
>>> > server for webRTC supporting in Open Meetings.
>>> >
>>> > --
>>> > Regards,
>>> > Dmitry Bezheckov.
>>> >
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Sebastian Wagner
>>> https://twitter.com/#!/dead_lock
>>> seba.wagner@gmail.com
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> WBR
>> Maxim aka solomax
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Sebastian Wagner
> https://twitter.com/#!/dead_lock
> seba.wagner@gmail.com
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message