Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-openmeetings-dev-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-openmeetings-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id DDE3A10980 for ; Tue, 26 Nov 2013 07:05:18 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 27920 invoked by uid 500); 26 Nov 2013 07:05:18 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-openmeetings-dev-archive@openmeetings.apache.org Received: (qmail 27739 invoked by uid 500); 26 Nov 2013 07:05:13 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@openmeetings.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@openmeetings.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@openmeetings.apache.org Received: (qmail 27124 invoked by uid 99); 26 Nov 2013 07:05:11 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 26 Nov 2013 07:05:11 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=4.2 required=5.0 tests=DEAR_SOMETHING,FREEMAIL_REPLY,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of utkarshkhokhar@gmail.com designates 209.85.219.41 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.219.41] (HELO mail-oa0-f41.google.com) (209.85.219.41) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 26 Nov 2013 07:05:05 +0000 Received: by mail-oa0-f41.google.com with SMTP id j17so5660064oag.0 for ; Mon, 25 Nov 2013 23:04:44 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=+STa1jr0DlMXR+kmmXwoARdlaUuHmLl76ossZ9WU0ds=; b=kfgPBTRgjXeGext3oVIZVshkZjyAA9o4uxc/W8AMYPPoOJBWeqxryxQ6kmUQ/uWAtV nnWMK2k9JoJVLg6ZQHmmCysgBZZvUVXhSBYnHxY5Rs9VfGVbIXvc6tc2GAUmuUbq1+7W uLBEoft06VXkxNQNDX9LHbMb72YcUGnRfCjF8qZhBIzk3oRAeAkTLb+BqZy4fZ9MQVPi h9pmxpQgL+2fMwcSxmRebtXAQqTDovc5jkPn8NzRbY3otAQ91DbEd0t94dgUuSkS1xij MIFHd4yrVZFP3rCRUAXpVZtS6hk/bQ+5CF6ITPvRZAwqjWCbrRDExAj5GOXgD8cXfeId 2amQ== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.60.67.105 with SMTP id m9mr2298322oet.58.1385449483994; Mon, 25 Nov 2013 23:04:43 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.182.48.131 with HTTP; Mon, 25 Nov 2013 23:04:43 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: <52936A6A.4020402@meecoda.de> <529370CB.9040608@meecoda.de> <5293C358.4010400@meecoda.de> Date: Tue, 26 Nov 2013 12:34:43 +0530 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Reg Openmeetings From: Utkarsh Khokhar To: dev@openmeetings.apache.org Cc: mathias.baessler@lupondo.de Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a11c301fc590c9d04ec0f187e X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --001a11c301fc590c9d04ec0f187e Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Thanks for the changes Maxim. I have a observation about a possible logical glitch with the new configuration variable "redirect.url.for.external.users" Eg. An OM User enters his meeting room using secureHash and also sends 2 different inviteHash for 2 different external users. Inorder to ensure that all the 3 users can stay connected in the same room throughout the call, one variable might not be sufficient. For instance if I saved the last hash sent (be it secure or invite) as "redirect.url.for.external.users" then only that url will get picked up everytime. Please correct me if I am wrong and missed something here. Utkarsh On Tue, Nov 26, 2013 at 8:31 AM, Maxim Solodovnik wrote: > OK > seems to be fixed https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OPENMEETINGS-842 > here is the patch: http://svn.apache.org/r1545517 > > can anyone please test it? > > external users will be redirected to the URL set in admin->config: > "redirect.url.for.external.users" > > the new config key and it's description is added to the docs > http://openmeetings.apache.org/GeneralConfiguration.html > > The changes above will be available here: > > https://builds.apache.org/view/M-R/view/OpenMeetings/job/Openmeetings%202.x/ > (build > #22) > > > > > On Tue, Nov 26, 2013 at 4:38 AM, Rene' Rosenbaum wrote: > > > Dear Maxime, > > may you please let me know which files you modified? We are using a > highly > > customized OM based on v2.1 and thus, have to migrate your modifications > > for now. We'll update quickly when 2.2 is stable enough for production. > > We highly appreciate all your efforts to solve this problem, > > Rene' > > > > > > ~~~~~~~ > > *Dr.-Ing. Rene' Rosenbaum > > meeCoda^IT * - Consulting and Services > > ~: Neue Reihe 15, 18182 Goorstorf, Germany > > #: ++49-(0)-1781408041 > > @:info@meecoda.de > > //:www.meecoda.de > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ +++ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ > > > > On 11/25/2013 6:21 PM, Maxim Solodovnik wrote: > > > >> After fix I need you to test 2.2 build with this feature added. > >> Will write into this thread. > >> > >> > >> On Mon, Nov 25, 2013 at 10:46 PM, Rene' Rosenbaum > >> wrote: > >> > >> Dear Maxim, > >>> that would be great! I think a solution is of value for many adopters > of > >>> OM embedding the software in their websites. Please let me know when > you > >>> need any support or further information ... > >>> Cheers, > >>> Rene' > >>> PS: We can sometimes reproduce the problem when suddenly switching off > >>> the > >>> network (plugging off). Works often with local installation, but less > >>> with > >>> second server machine. > >>> > >>> > >>> ~~~~~~~ > >>> *Dr.-Ing. Rene' Rosenbaum > >>> meeCoda^IT * - Consulting and Services > >>> ~: Neue Reihe 15, 18182 Goorstorf, Germany > >>> #: ++49-(0)-1781408041 > >>> @:info@meecoda.de > >>> //:www.meecoda.de > >>> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ +++ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ > >>> > >>> On 11/25/2013 4:24 PM, Maxim Solodovnik wrote: > >>> > >>> I'll try to reproduce add code for this > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> On Mon, Nov 25, 2013 at 10:19 PM, Rene' Rosenbaum > >>>> wrote: > >>>> > >>>> Hi all, > >>>> > >>>>> first of all, thanks for all the good work of the team so far. We are > >>>>> using OM as a conferencing solution, part of a larger website. We are > >>>>> facing similar issues as described before: from time to time, a > >>>>> conferencing session crashes*and the user is then referred to the > start > >>>>> page/dashboard of the OM backend*. As we are not working with the > >>>>> backend > >>>>> at all (all user management is done via the website), we have a huge > >>>>> problem here. We adapted the URL in the "onerror"-handler (in > >>>>> hibRtmpConnection.lzx), but this didn't do the trick: the stated URL > is > >>>>> not > >>>>> called. > >>>>> > >>>>> --------------------- > >>>>> > >>>>> >>>>> ... > >>>>> canvas.thishib.loaderVar.error.setAttribute('text',this.status); > >>>>> canvas.setAttribute('loadingmessage','connection failed'); > >>>>> new lz.labelerrorPopup(canvas,{ > >>>>> errorlabelid:556}); > >>>>> } > >>>>> *canvas.thishib.loaderVar._src.setAttribute('text','http: > >>>>> //www.google.de/');* > >>>>> //canvas.thishib.loaderVar._src.setAttribute('text',src); > >>>>> } > >>>>> ]]> > >>>>> > >>>>> --------------------- > >>>>> > >>>>> Do you guys have an idea what we can do here to refer the user to an > >>>>> arbitrary URL and not the dashboard? > >>>>> > >>>>> Setup details: > >>>>> - OM v2.1 > >>>>> - just using the conferencing part embedded via SOAP/REST into an > >>>>> iframe > >>>>> - complete setup of a conference via SOAP/REST (users, documents, > etc.) > >>>>> > >>>>> Thanks for all your help, > >>>>> Rene' > >>>>> -- > >>>>> > >>>>> ~~~~~~~ > >>>>> *Dr.-Ing. Rene' Rosenbaum > >>>>> meeCoda^IT * - Consulting and Services > >>>>> ~: Neue Reihe 15, 18182 Goorstorf, Germany > >>>>> #: ++49-(0)-1781408041 > >>>>> @:info@meecoda.de > >>>>> //:www.meecoda.de > >>>>> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ +++ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ > >>>>> > >>>>> On 11/25/2013 10:02 AM, Maxim Solodovnik wrote: > >>>>> > >>>>> I believe this will be resolved in 3.1. > >>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> On Mon, Nov 25, 2013 at 2:37 PM, Utkarsh Khokhar > >>>>>> wrote: > >>>>>> > >>>>>> I am dealing with the exact same problem at my end. > >>>>>> > >>>>>> Anyone who joins a room directly through secureHash or inviteHash > >>>>>>> gets > >>>>>>> disconnected at times, due to network issue, and taken back to > >>>>>>> dashboard. > >>>>>>> I believe this is quite a fundamental problem. I am yet to dive > into > >>>>>>> this > >>>>>>> completely but it would be great to learn from others on this forum > >>>>>>> who > >>>>>>> might have a prior insight on this. > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> On Mon, Nov 25, 2013 at 12:51 PM, Maxim Solodovnik < > >>>>>>> solomax666@gmail.com > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> wrote: > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> If I'm not mistaken, Sebastian told it is impossible to reconnect > >>>>>>>> user > >>>>>>>> to > >>>>>>>> the same scope ... > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> On Mon, Nov 25, 2013 at 1:58 PM, sanjeev kumar < > >>>>>>>> sanjeev1048@gmail.com > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> wrote: > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> Dear Sir > >>>>>>>>> I want add functionality to reconnect user in the same > >>>>>>>>> scope > >>>>>>>>> while > >>>>>>>>> his NetConnection lost due to NetConnection.connect.NetworkChange > >>>>>>>>> or > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> Closed. > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> when any event generates other than Success it is going > to > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> onerror > >>>>>>>>> (in hibRtmpConnection.lzx ) handler there it is disconnecting > from > >>>>>>>>> the > >>>>>>>>> current scope and connecting to default scope. > >>>>>>>>> so how i can reconnect to same scope again..... > >>>>>>>>> what i am doing , from onerror handler it self i am calling > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> this.connect() > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> but in the userlist multiple entries are coming for same user , > >>>>>>>> so i > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> want > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> to know correct way of reconnecting in to same scope > automatically. > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> please help me..... > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> Thanks & Regards > >>>>>>>>> Sanjeev Kumar > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> -- > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> WBR > >>>>>>>> Maxim aka solomax > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> > >> > > > > > -- > WBR > Maxim aka solomax > --001a11c301fc590c9d04ec0f187e--