openmeetings-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Andun Sameera <andun...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: First whiteboard task
Date Sun, 16 Jun 2013 13:18:10 GMT
Hi,

As Maxim requested I have finalized the WysiwygWicket Module. I have
updated the Jira https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OPENMEETINGS-558.

You can find a sample which runs on top the particular component in here
https://github.com/andunslg/Wysiwyg-Wicket-Sample.

Thanks!

On Tue, Jun 11, 2013 at 12:49 PM, Maxim Solodovnik <solomax666@gmail.com>wrote:

> Hello Andun,
>
> sorry for the late response
> It is really hard to make a decision in this case
>
> It is really hard to refuse working contribution, plus I don't want to
> have more than 1 JS library doing the same :(
> So I think we should stay on closure if there is no strong disadvantages.
>
> So I would say if your investigation will show
> 1) JS library B is better maintained
> 2) has stronger comunity
> 3) is better integrated with jQuery
> ..... etc.
>
> we will need to choose another library as base library for your project.
>
>
> Current WB proposed by Andrey has different functionality than current OM
> WB.
>
>
>
> On Sat, Jun 8, 2013 at 6:14 PM, Andun Sameera <andunslg@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Hi Maxim,
>>
>> I have checked the working prototype which was submitted. It has many
>> functionality implemented. While knowing that, I will compare the
>> libraries. After that from what I should make the prototype? From the one
>> which we have more advantages? Or do I need to implement a prototype in
>> kinteticjs or raphaeljs to compare it with the closure one?
>>
>> Thanks!
>>
>>
>> On Sat, Jun 8, 2013 at 12:16 AM, Maxim Solodovnik <solomax666@gmail.com>wrote:
>>
>>> Why I'm asking is:
>>> we already have working prototype contributed
>>> it is written using "google closure" (it is not fully synchronized, but
>>> able to draw)
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Sat, Jun 8, 2013 at 1:42 AM, Andun Sameera <andunslg@gmail.com>wrote:
>>>
>>>> OK Maxim. Also I was planning to use kineticJS to implement whiteboard.
>>>> Will list all pros and cons for that also.
>>>>
>>>> Thanks!
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Sat, Jun 8, 2013 at 12:09 AM, Maxim Solodovnik <solomax666@gmail.com
>>>> > wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Hello Andun,
>>>>>
>>>>> I'll be on vacation with limited or no internet connection
>>>>> 2013.06.12-2013.06.25
>>>>> Please do the following
>>>>>
>>>>> 1) Take a look at this whiteboard prototype:
>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OPENMEETINGS-662
>>>>> I need you to:
>>>>>
>>>>>    1. provide pros and contras of using rafael.js VS "google closure"
>>>>>    to implement whiteboard
>>>>>    2. start prototyping WB without messages exchange
>>>>>
>>>>> 2) Finish WYSIWYG plugin, I believe it can be used as deliverable in
>>>>> GSOC.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Please contact dev list while my vacation.
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> WBR
>>>>> Maxim aka solomax
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Regards
>>>> Andun S.L. Gunawardana
>>>> Undergraduate
>>>> Department of Computer Science And Engineering
>>>> University of Moratuwa
>>>> Sri Lanka
>>>>
>>>> Blog - http://www.insightforfuture.blogspot.com/
>>>> LinkedIn - http://www.linkedin.com/pub/andun-s-l-gunawardana/34/646/703
>>>> Twitter -http://twitter.com/AndunSLG
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> WBR
>>> Maxim aka solomax
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Regards
>> Andun S.L. Gunawardana
>> Undergraduate
>> Department of Computer Science And Engineering
>> University of Moratuwa
>> Sri Lanka
>>
>> Blog - http://www.insightforfuture.blogspot.com/
>> LinkedIn - http://www.linkedin.com/pub/andun-s-l-gunawardana/34/646/703
>> Twitter -http://twitter.com/AndunSLG
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>
>
> --
> WBR
> Maxim aka solomax
>



-- 
Regards
Andun S.L. Gunawardana
Undergraduate
Department of Computer Science And Engineering
University of Moratuwa
Sri Lanka

Blog - http://www.insightforfuture.blogspot.com/
LinkedIn - http://www.linkedin.com/pub/andun-s-l-gunawardana/34/646/703
Twitter -http://twitter.com/AndunSLG

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message