openmeetings-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Ross Gardler <rgard...@opendirective.com>
Subject Re: Datetime picker for calendar (and maybe other components)
Date Thu, 25 Apr 2013 08:48:30 GMT
As explained in the legal list the compatibility is one way, Apache code in
GPL code. If we include GPL we invoke the reciprocal clauses and thus must
distribute as GPL.

In practice we often find projects are willing to dual license if we ask
nicely. It depends on why they chose GPL in the first place.

Sent from a mobile device, please excuse mistakes and brevity
On 25 Apr 2013 07:41, "Maxim Solodovnik" <solomax666@gmail.com> wrote:

> I disagree
> AFAIK derived means you have changes something and include changed library
> to your product.
>
> According to the link below:
> http://www.gnu.org/licenses/quick-guide-gplv3.en.html
>
> In addition to clarifying the rules about licenses that are already
> GPL-compatible, GPLv3 is also newly compatible with a few other licenses.
> The Apache License 2.0 is a prime example.
>
>
>
>
> On Thu, Apr 25, 2013 at 1:30 PM, Alexei Fedotov <alexei.fedotov@gmail.com
> >wrote:
>
> > When some product uses a library, the product is derived.
> > --
> > With best regards / с наилучшими пожеланиями,
> > Alexei Fedotov / Алексей Федотов,
> > http://dataved.ru/
> > +7 916 562 8095
> >
> >
> > On Thu, Apr 25, 2013 at 10:25 AM, Maxim Solodovnik <solomax666@gmail.com
> >
> > wrote:
> > > We are going to use their library with no modifications, so this is not
> > the
> > > case?
> > >
> > >
> > > On Thu, Apr 25, 2013 at 11:54 AM, Alexei Fedotov
> > > <alexei.fedotov@gmail.com>wrote:
> > >
> > >> > This licensing incompatibility applies *only* when some Apache
> project
> > >> software becomes a derivative work of some GPLv3 software,
> > >>
> > >> http://www.apache.org/licenses/GPL-compatibility.html
> > >>
> > >> --
> > >> With best regards / с наилучшими пожеланиями,
> > >> Alexei Fedotov / Алексей Федотов,
> > >> http://dataved.ru/
> > >> +7 916 562 8095
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> On Thu, Apr 25, 2013 at 8:37 AM, Maxim Solodovnik <
> solomax666@gmail.com
> > >> >wrote:
> > >>
> > >> > From the link I have already sent:
> > >> >
> > >> > LicensingKendo UI is licensed under GPLv3, which is compatible with
> > >> Apache
> > >> > License 2.0
> > >> >
> > >> > GPLv3 is also newly compatible with a few other licenses. The Apache
> > >> > License 2.0 is a prime example. Lots of great free software is
> > available
> > >> > under this license, with strong communities surrounding it. We hope
> > that
> > >> > this change in GPLv3 will foster more cooperation and sharing within
> > the
> > >> > free software community.
> > >> >
> > >> > More info here: http://www.gnu.org/licenses/quick-guide-gplv3.html
> > >> >
> > >> >
> > >> > On Thu, Apr 25, 2013 at 10:37 AM, Alexei Fedotov
> > >> > <alexei.fedotov@gmail.com>wrote:
> > >> >
> > >> > > Do they have double licensing?
> > >> > > On Apr 25, 2013 7:30 AM, "Maxim Solodovnik" <solomax666@gmail.com
> >
> > >> > wrote:
> > >> > >
> > >> > > > Project page states: Licence GPLv3 AND Apache compatible
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > > On Thu, Apr 25, 2013 at 10:24 AM, Alexei Fedotov
> > >> > > > <alexei.fedotov@gmail.com>wrote:
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > > > There is though javascript exception in Apache practice
which
> > >> treats
> > >> > > > > javascript as data, thus effectively ignores its license.
I
> > think
> > >> we
> > >> > > > better
> > >> > > > > ask on the legal list.
> > >> > > > > On Apr 24, 2013 9:31 PM, "Maxim Solodovnik" <
> > solomax666@gmail.com>
> > >> > > > wrote:
> > >> > > > >
> > >> > > > > > it is GPLv3 which is Apache compatible
> > >> > > > > >
> > >> > > > > >
> > >> > > > > > On Thu, Apr 25, 2013 at 12:29 AM, Alexei Fedotov
> > >> > > > > > <alexei.fedotov@gmail.com>wrote:
> > >> > > > > >
> > >> > > > > > > I cannot check the license from my phone
> > >> > > > > > > On Apr 24, 2013 4:46 PM, "Maxim Solodovnik"
<
> > >> > solomax666@gmail.com>
> > >> > > > > > wrote:
> > >> > > > > > >
> > >> > > > > > > > Hello all,
> > >> > > > > > > >
> > >> > > > > > > > I would like to propose these Datetime
picker
> > >> > > > > > > >
> > >> > > > > > > >
> > >> > > > > > >
> > >> > > > > >
> > >> > > > >
> > >> > > >
> > >> > >
> > >> >
> > >>
> >
> http://www.7thweb.net/wicket-jquery-ui/kendo/datetimepicker/DateTimePickerPage
> > >> > > > > > > > to be used in our Calendar event. and
maybe other
> > components
> > >> > > > > > > >
> > >> > > > > > > > pros:
> > >> > > > > > > > 1) it is smooth and jquery based (currently
Wicket uses
> > YUI
> > >> > > > > datepicker)
> > >> > > > > > > > 2) it allows to select both date and
time in one
> component
> > >> > > > > > > > 3) it has compatible license
> > >> > > > > > > > 4) it has working demo, so integration
will be easy
> > >> > > > > > > >
> > >> > > > > > > > What do you think?
> > >> > > > > > > >
> > >> > > > > > > > --
> > >> > > > > > > > WBR
> > >> > > > > > > > Maxim aka solomax
> > >> > > > > > > >
> > >> > > > > > >
> > >> > > > > >
> > >> > > > > >
> > >> > > > > >
> > >> > > > > > --
> > >> > > > > > WBR
> > >> > > > > > Maxim aka solomax
> > >> > > > > >
> > >> > > > >
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > > --
> > >> > > > WBR
> > >> > > > Maxim aka solomax
> > >> > > >
> > >> > >
> > >> >
> > >> >
> > >> >
> > >> > --
> > >> > WBR
> > >> > Maxim aka solomax
> > >> >
> > >>
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > WBR
> > > Maxim aka solomax
> >
>
>
>
> --
> WBR
> Maxim aka solomax
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message