openmeetings-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Maxim Solodovnik <solomax...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: Structure of binaries and sources in dist folder
Date Wed, 03 Apr 2013 05:09:05 GMT
OK, so the only change I made is renaming 2.1 to be 2.1.0.
Is this correct?


On Wed, Apr 3, 2013 at 11:48 AM, seba.wagner@gmail.com <
seba.wagner@gmail.com> wrote:

> yes,
>
> sounds good. I will probably need 2-3 days to create some article, but
> that should be fine actually.
>
> Sebastian
>
>
> 2013/4/3 Maxim Solodovnik <solomax666@gmail.com>
>
>> Here is the example:
>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/tomcat/tomcat-7/v7.0.39/
>> The structure is our own responsibility :)
>> Since I need to rename 2.1 to 2.1.0 I can move source out of src as made
>> here: https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/wicket/6.6.0/
>>
>> I'll update website and will write announce
>>
>> Can you write to the blog and to press@a.o ?
>>
>>
>> On Wed, Apr 3, 2013 at 11:21 AM, seba.wagner@gmail.com <
>> seba.wagner@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Yeah,
>>>
>>> I did not really expect that this folder structure of the RC candidate
>>> will be exactly the folder structure of our distribution area.
>>>  Is there an example of any Apache Project that does organize the
>>> sources and binaries like that?
>>> If yes then we might be able to continue the release process.
>>> If not we might simply change the structure and wait another 24 horus
>>> for the mirrors to sync.
>>>
>>> There is also plenty of other stuff todo:
>>>  - updating the website as soon as the mirrors have synced
>>>  - Writing the announce message to several lists
>>>  - catching up with the press team at press@apache.org to find out how
>>> we can work together and provide them with nice article for our first
>>> release
>>>  - write a nice blog post at blogs.apache.org
>>>
>>> That is what comes to my mind. Actually those tasks are not all part of
>>> the todos of the release manager. Anybody of us can take care of for
>>> example writing the blog post.
>>>
>>> Sebastian
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> 2013/4/3 Maxim Solodovnik <solomax666@gmail.com>
>>>
>>>> Hello Sebastian,
>>>>
>>>> While creating file/folder structure I inspected some other projects,
>>>> flex, wicket, tomcat, mina etc.all of them have binaries and sources
>>>> somehow separated, I'll rename the folder in the dist as soon as we will
>>>> agree on folder structure (was hope the structure was reviewed on release
>>>> candidates ...) since it blocks announce (mirrors need to be synced)
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Wed, Apr 3, 2013 at 7:11 AM, seba.wagner@gmail.com <
>>>> seba.wagner@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Hi Maxim,
>>>>>
>>>>> could you plz check if our binaries and sources are correctly
>>>>> organized?
>>>>> I am currently not sure, the other projects seem to have the structure:
>>>>>
>>>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/rave/binaries/
>>>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/rave/sources/
>>>>>
>>>>> while we do create a binary and source folder for each version.
>>>>>
>>>>> I know this might be picky but its our first release and it is likely
>>>>> that the conventions we make now will stay like that forever.
>>>>>
>>>>> So are we going to create a separate folder for each release?
>>>>> So https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/openmeetings/2.1/bin
>>>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/openmeetings/2.2/bin
>>>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/openmeetings/2.3/bin
>>>>> Is that in line with the ASF docs ?
>>>>>
>>>>> The other projects seem to cut the 0 in the name of the release. We
>>>>> have it now with the folder name 2.1 and the package itself is called
>>>>> 2.1.0. Please decide for either one :)
>>>>> Either you call the folder (if there is one for each release) 2.1.0
>>>>> and the package 2.1.0 or call the folder 2.1 and the package has the
name
>>>>> 2.1 :)
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>> Sebastian
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> Sebastian Wagner
>>>>> https://twitter.com/#!/dead_lock
>>>>> http://www.webbase-design.de
>>>>> http://www.wagner-sebastian.com
>>>>> seba.wagner@gmail.com
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> WBR
>>>> Maxim aka solomax
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Sebastian Wagner
>>> https://twitter.com/#!/dead_lock
>>> http://www.webbase-design.de
>>> http://www.wagner-sebastian.com
>>> seba.wagner@gmail.com
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> WBR
>> Maxim aka solomax
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Sebastian Wagner
> https://twitter.com/#!/dead_lock
> http://www.webbase-design.de
> http://www.wagner-sebastian.com
> seba.wagner@gmail.com
>



-- 
WBR
Maxim aka solomax

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message