openmeetings-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Alexei Fedotov <alexei.fedo...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: [VOTE] Apache OpenMeetings 2.1.0 Release Candidate 1
Date Sun, 10 Mar 2013 20:04:17 GMT
Hello Jaime,

-1 votes should contain some justification
11.03.2013 0:02 пользователь "Jaime Balbino" <jaimebalb@gmail.com> написал:

> I review my vote: -1
>
>
> 2013/3/10 seba.wagner@gmail.com <seba.wagner@gmail.com>
>
> > I appreciate all efforts going into that release but I think it needs
> some
> > more testing.
> > Therefore my vote is currently negative.
> >
> > Mainly because recording on OSX did not work
> > I will have to verify that on another box where windows is installed.
> > Testing machine OSX 10.8.2, java 1.6.0_43
> > Database: Default derby build in database
> > Issues:
> >  - Server needed 50% of the CPU as soon as I started to record in the
> > screensharing client (the java process of the server took 50% the
> > screensharing process took another 20-30 %).
> > After starting the recording, hitting the stop button just resulted in
> > nothing.
> >
> > I am also a bit concerned about the Flash Players CPU usage. In previous
> > versions I think the usage of the CPU was significant lower when you did
> a
> > share your cam+mic.
> > But I first need to verify that using the old release to have some
> concrete
> > numbers.
> >
> > The Clustering feature is also not ready to be officially released. The
> > release notes say nothing about the missing components.
> > For example: Whiteboard not stored in database, chat not stored in
> database
> > (which both has minor effects when not done however this would be
> essential
> > to know for anybody doing tests with it).
> > The overall chat is not stored in the database and also not synced
> between
> > cluster nodes, so that the initial node of the cluster should be the same
> > for anybody connecting to openmeetings (also this has only minor effects
> > but nowhere documented).
> > Server user/pass is nowhere in use but still to be in the database.
> > After all there is only a single 3th party verification of the cluster.
> > The feature is of beta quality.
> >
> > Sebastian
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > 2013/3/8 Maxim Solodovnik <solomax666@gmail.com>
> >
> > > That's a pity :(
> > > I was sure all blocking issues are resolved. (There was mail thread
> with
> > > "release" bug list)
> > >
> > > @George can you create issues in JIRA?
> > >
> > > @Sebastian currently I'm modifying Release guide "on the fly" I'll
> update
> > > it with all my steps, so it will be up-to-date
> > >
> > >
> > > On Fri, Mar 8, 2013 at 9:10 AM, George Kirkham <gkirkham@co2crc.com.au
> > > >wrote:
> > >
> > > > -1
> > > >
> > > > Hi All,
> > > >
> > > > I personally believe we should delay the release of RC1 while we
> attend
> > > to
> > > > minor design/GUI and bug issues.
> > > >
> > > > During this time that Apache OpenMeetings 2.1.0 RC1 is going through
> > > > testing and bug fixes, development [of new features] could continue
> > with
> > > > Apache OpenMeetings 2.2.
> > > >
> > > > My reasoning is that people I show OpenMeetings to are impressed with
> > its
> > > > capabilities but are really turned off by the obvious issues with the
> > > > system, for example text that flows over or under other test or
> fields
> > in
> > > > the windows/dialog boxes.
> > > >
> > > > Now that we are with Apache, I would really appreciate it if
> > OpenMeetings
> > > > did not have these little but annoying issues/bugs and that we put
> > > forward
> > > > a much more professional and polished product. An easy to use,
> > > consistent,
> > > > and stable application.  New features can be added along the way with
> > > > version 2.2, but we really should get to a position where what we
> have
> > > for
> > > > 2.1.0 RC1 is well designed and maintained.
> > > >
> > > > When people complain about the look and feel (and they are correct to
> > > > complain), it really upsets me, and my users do complain, not loudly,
> > but
> > > > it is obvious that they do not appreciate these minor issues that
> > detract
> > > > from an otherwise great application, I would request that we attend
> to
> > > > these issues before we release OpenMeetings version 2.1.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Thanks,
> > > >
> > > > George Kirkham
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > From: Maxim Solodovnik [mailto:solomax666@gmail.com]
> > > > Sent: Thursday, 7 March 2013 5:10 AM
> > > > To: private@openmeetings.apache.org
> > > > Subject: Fwd: [VOTE] Apache OpenMeetings 2.1.0 Release Candidate 1
> > > >
> > > > ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> > > > From: Maxim Solodovnik <solomax666@gmail.com>
> > > > Date: Thu, Mar 7, 2013 at 1:09 AM
> > > > Subject: [VOTE] Apache OpenMeetings 2.1.0 Release Candidate 1
> > > > To: dev <dev@openmeetings.apache.org>
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Dear OpenMeetings Community,
> > > >
> > > > I would like to start a vote about releasing Apache OpenMeetings
> 2.1.0
> > > RC1
> > > >
> > > > Main changes are covered in the
> > > > Readme:
> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/openmeetings/tags/2.1RC1/README
> > > >
> > > > Full Changelog:
> > > > http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/openmeetings/tags/2.1RC1/CHANGELOG
> > > >
> > > > Release artefacts:
> > > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/openmeetings/2.1/rc1/
> > > >
> > > > Tag:http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/openmeetings/tags/2.1RC1/
> > > >
> > > > PGP release keys (signed using C467526E):
> > > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/openmeetings/2.1/rc1/KEYS
> > > >
> > > > Vote will be open for 72 hours.
> > > >
> > > > [ ] +1  approve
> > > > [ ] +0  no opinion
> > > > [ ] -1  disapprove (and reason why)
> > > >
> > > > My vote is +1.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > - --
> > > > WBR
> > > > Maxim aka solomax
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > - --
> > > > WBR
> > > > Maxim aka solomax
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > WBR
> > > Maxim aka solomax
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Sebastian Wagner
> > https://twitter.com/#!/dead_lock
> > http://www.webbase-design.de
> > http://www.wagner-sebastian.com
> > seba.wagner@gmail.com
> >
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message