openmeetings-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Maxim Solodovnik <>
Subject Re: [DISCUSS] Manual vs Dynamic (Software Based) Load Balancing
Date Tue, 27 Nov 2012 03:37:49 GMT
I believe room capacity check should also be added.
I mean in our configuration we have 10 rooms and 2 servers
9 rooms has capacity of 1-10
1 room has capacity of 150

in such situation it is better to have room with capacity of 150 on
separate server.

On Tue, Nov 27, 2012 at 10:30 AM, <> wrote:

> I have a request to discuss regarding clustering.
> Status: The syncing of the sessions in the cluster from the slaves to the
> master is basically ready. So the master of the cluster has a light version
> of the slave's session object, and it is possible for the master to find
> out the load across the cluster. The master can also kick out users from a
> conference room that is hosted on any slave.
> The question is know: How do we calculate which conference room is assigned
> to which server?
> Basically there is no need to have a configuration value in the
> organization or conference room, that assigns the room to any server in the
> cluster.
> You can simply do that dynamically: *As soon as the first user enters the
> conference room, the cluster checks which server has free capacities and
> starts the conference room on that slave.* And then anybody joining the
> conference will be redirected to the same server.
> I basically like this idea, as it makes it more dynamic and it is likely
> that you will use your given resources better with such a solution then by
> manually assigning slave/servers to conference rooms (often nobody uses
> those rooms and the slave/server will be just a zombie server that is
> blocked but has nothing todo).
> What do you think?
> Sebastian
> --
> Sebastian Wagner

Maxim aka solomax

  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message