From users-return-12131-archive-asf-public=cust-asf.ponee.io@openjpa.apache.org Mon Apr 9 02:17:13 2018 Return-Path: X-Original-To: archive-asf-public@cust-asf.ponee.io Delivered-To: archive-asf-public@cust-asf.ponee.io Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by mx-eu-01.ponee.io (Postfix) with SMTP id 0FB8E180638 for ; Mon, 9 Apr 2018 02:17:12 +0200 (CEST) Received: (qmail 78456 invoked by uid 500); 9 Apr 2018 00:17:12 -0000 Mailing-List: contact users-help@openjpa.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: users@openjpa.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list users@openjpa.apache.org Received: (qmail 78440 invoked by uid 99); 9 Apr 2018 00:17:11 -0000 Received: from pnap-us-west-generic-nat.apache.org (HELO spamd1-us-west.apache.org) (209.188.14.142) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 09 Apr 2018 00:17:11 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by spamd1-us-west.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at spamd1-us-west.apache.org) with ESMTP id E7886C1381 for ; Mon, 9 Apr 2018 00:17:10 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at spamd1-us-west.apache.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -0.102 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.102 tagged_above=-999 required=6.31 tests=[DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=disabled Authentication-Results: spamd1-us-west.apache.org (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com Received: from mx1-lw-us.apache.org ([10.40.0.8]) by localhost (spamd1-us-west.apache.org [10.40.0.7]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id qWQAor0GkDJm for ; Mon, 9 Apr 2018 00:17:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-pf0-f172.google.com (mail-pf0-f172.google.com [209.85.192.172]) by mx1-lw-us.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at mx1-lw-us.apache.org) with ESMTPS id C9FB85FAE6 for ; Mon, 9 Apr 2018 00:17:08 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-pf0-f172.google.com with SMTP id l27so4723607pfk.12 for ; Sun, 08 Apr 2018 17:17:08 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=YhPUxIUgOniSc/3x5Zt75ElVGepDsQrfGVrHEVne+OM=; b=SBL9rxCy2UQ6IJvmE++jI7OoZ1/clQPlqPRykBNk+Z+y48z0epnfCT8U4Q1xQ89/5H vsMi7I3SQQPVUO9q8/9Bh4iC+eEFyDbeFMzcYbEeboqlC+3Ajb9K4kw7G6B0/R0LHcUh v35etlSd7qm0WSzdyDeG7BNjbTCx6Ymi4chxq0C5fyKoTOo8tripq2U+5EDqR4/WXm1L E5IonaUM5N5pFksyj02sbosY/3uXgmtH63ZKOoSOlhUaBDxzGiMjLP6IyqkFaJFDW+/S jYTeY/1V9pR7/Xj/8oG4X9xUjY8P1qv68f3EoV1QcDJ+Lx+0+8ZPd9+DBMO1dGi4oS10 jGLw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to; bh=YhPUxIUgOniSc/3x5Zt75ElVGepDsQrfGVrHEVne+OM=; b=c6uqqWPFZS5kPFVxmG7tCX1VANezKWnmDiaMbWq2BYmoz7QzBLJHkRHdrb27Ie7vTt Z/qFdl0Qu5tjSO7VRyyDMsqHBFUqXU24vCTMXaY5oV4McSvz4HPQq1dkiVH9+irgnRQ1 8b+7cTwYprBxbtfQ5o+Ob3Uf3WzUcijJUi1F827WTIskgwhAcwK4J2foXdhFhJXQ3u17 5YhW6olG/d9NqO/G8Jo5WqF0Zf8j0CRcyNYdf6yCg/qV3gcuSM9HpmntkYHJ0tIrLtDd 5ebojfmV1otVsi5liYxny6pNPdVJqfF5Dr6S0VAg1gcMyREPdfFS07Yd7+CySyz83V5K mC4w== X-Gm-Message-State: ALQs6tBb/fL14KRpI5tTLr8Yc6p8DA7CJ7JIHFiGyBUwB/0rByfLD0Os 9ie8auSWH7R5vWCj16nQTkAEeoYfWIYwslvsSdGdvRJ+ X-Google-Smtp-Source: AIpwx4/FuJXAdqQPtWA2IYFK/rFQr+xxvHWnvQqcNSx8sIy8/aqhSGjZpAp210Ojp+3CtkgklX8sWFd72hm78lc45DQ= X-Received: by 10.98.247.15 with SMTP id h15mr16904110pfi.165.1523233020285; Sun, 08 Apr 2018 17:17:00 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.100.221.6 with HTTP; Sun, 8 Apr 2018 17:16:39 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: From: Pawel Veselov Date: Mon, 9 Apr 2018 02:16:39 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Re: More test failures - JPA spec overwritten To: users@openjpa.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" On Sun, Apr 8, 2018 at 5:22 PM, Pawel Veselov wrote: > Trying to run more tests on 2.4.2. My first compilation was > successful, but now there is another phantom exception that I have no > clue how to resolve. Any help would be appreciated. I haven't made any > changes anywhere that should affect this... > > I don't know where the JPA specification is set, or where, or what > file, is it coming from. OK, this was just me panicking. That trace was an expected failure. The only problem that I don't quite understand that I have left during running tests is: https://pastebin.com/aPciDKR8 The enhancer version of the enhanced classes is 2, but the enhancer is 1674154, which matches the SVN revision of the enhancer, and I believe that's what it should be. I don't know where it gets the 2 from.