> OK, so can I suggest that the web page needs updating as it is currently
> misleading.
Oh, thanks for the pointer!
> Also why do you suppose that Eclipse seems to think that the openjpa
> jar file in tomee contains a 2.1 JPA implementation rather than a 2.0 one?
> It is resisting me trying to "downgrade" JPA support to 2.0 with the
> 2.4 jar installed.
Hmm, that’s weird indeed. But I guess this has more to do with Eclipse than with openjpa.
LieGrue,
strub
> Am 06.04.2015 um 13:15 schrieb David Goodenough <david.goodenough@btconnect.com>:
>
> OK, so can I suggest that the web page needs updating as it is currently
> misleading.
>
> Also why do you suppose that Eclipse seems to think that the openjpa
> jar file in tomee contains a 2.1 JPA implementation rather than a 2.0 one?
> It is resisting me trying to "downgrade" JPA support to 2.0 with the
> 2.4 jar installed.
>
> David
>
> On Monday 06 April 2015 12:17:00 Mark Struberg wrote:
>> Hi!
>>
>> openjpa-2.4.0 is indeed targetting JPA-2.0.
>>
>> I personally would like to target JPA-2.1 soon, but before that I would
>> love to see a few cleanup efforts being done. E.g. cleaning up our bytecode
>> parts and move all to xbean-asm5-shaded.
>>
>> LieGrue,
>> strub
>>
>>> Am 06.04.2015 um 11:15 schrieb David Goodenough
>>> <david.goodenough@btconnect.com>:
>>>
>>> According to:-
>>>
>>> http://openjpa.apache.org/jpa-2.1-development-process.html
>>>
>>> openjpa 2.4 is the release that should implement JPA 2.1. But I am told
>>> on the tomee mailing list that although tomee 2.0 included an
>>> openjpa 2.4 snapshot it does not support jpa 2.1.
>>>
>>> I am confused, can someone enlighten me.
>>>
>>> David
>
|