Return-Path: 
 <users-return-11645-apmail-openjpa-users-archive=openjpa.apache.org@openjpa.apache.org>
X-Original-To: apmail-openjpa-users-archive@minotaur.apache.org
Delivered-To: apmail-openjpa-users-archive@minotaur.apache.org
Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3])
	by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 942B5176D5
	for <apmail-openjpa-users-archive@minotaur.apache.org>;
 Thu, 23 Oct 2014 15:54:52 +0000 (UTC)
Received: (qmail 37639 invoked by uid 500); 23 Oct 2014 15:54:52 -0000
Delivered-To: apmail-openjpa-users-archive@openjpa.apache.org
Received: (qmail 37578 invoked by uid 500); 23 Oct 2014 15:54:52 -0000
Mailing-List: contact users-help@openjpa.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:users-help@openjpa.apache.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:users-unsubscribe@openjpa.apache.org>
List-Post: <mailto:users@openjpa.apache.org>
List-Id: <users.openjpa.apache.org>
Reply-To: users@openjpa.apache.org
Delivered-To: mailing list users@openjpa.apache.org
Received: (qmail 37395 invoked by uid 99); 23 Oct 2014 15:54:51 -0000
Received: from mx1-us-east.apache.org (HELO mx1-us-east.apache.org)
 (54.164.171.186)
    by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 23 Oct 2014 15:54:51 +0000
Received: from mx1-us-east.apache.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by mx1-us-east.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at mx1-us-east.apache.org) with
 ESMTP id 829BD43865;
	Thu, 23 Oct 2014 15:54:51 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by mx1-us-east.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at
 mx1-us-east.apache.org, from userid 111)
	id 7807C43868; Thu, 23 Oct 2014 15:54:51 +0000 (UTC)
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on
	mx1-us-east.apache.org
X-Spam-Level: **
X-Spam-Status: No, score=2.7 required=10.0 tests=DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,
	DKIM_VALID_AU,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3,
	RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED,URI_HEX autolearn=disabled
	version=3.4.0
Received: from mail-qc0-f175.google.com (mail-qc0-f175.google.com
 [209.85.216.175])
	by mx1-us-east.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at mx1-us-east.apache.org) with
 ESMTPS id 3066543865;
	Thu, 23 Oct 2014 15:54:51 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by mail-qc0-f175.google.com with SMTP id b13so1072426qcw.34
        for <multiple recipients>; Thu, 23 Oct 2014 08:54:15 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
        h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to
         :cc:content-type;
        bh=upCyjN5Xjc0aHXvP69jJdulJl4GrJKmaVvwCZdecicY=;
        b=XeBMs+CaFlfX7DIDXh6hv++94SpaNcSa71bwHBMV9O+/3oMMDtauNBo7FmcKhiTLHn
         cYJq1QBTYRYa1lCn5qH76pNr6xHiVKjru+I9bz0WAKHZVpjdczXL+nQgCsa6s8DxlCWA
         aO/b4mVJYaTBNSd39FqGB3ZwL6TG2V0mBk7lK28sdmO51LKnRIfIhbXy0dZ98c+rtvM6
         3uc7Bl83HB3Q8zKZNTzjpWpL0T/IgttP9wITuUGp/OKR8FuvLyWM0lDg9inADhi2DHxL
         sBi19rtFhEvO41nCUe1em/9xdzL4T7YZD27dzDqv6Vi19T9+dp+poNhLKX6eXNwjaEuf
         wstA==
X-Received: by 10.140.44.8 with SMTP id f8mr8255262qga.105.1414079654996; Thu,
 23 Oct 2014 08:54:14 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.140.18.208 with HTTP; Thu, 23 Oct 2014 08:53:53 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <1414014712599-7587287.post@n2.nabble.com>
References: 
 <CAGZB7Rg1M0JYusv7GiNkt+y2YK9c9TBzFAaYxkiB=c046wBziA@mail.gmail.com>
 <CABH8erm4D85U8JPjJusS5L7NU3zbU9366yQ5=H7pnYGG3dTHaA@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAGZB7RjwPQjxQexEwgBfUn0i0T+3udxf1KLE3CqBHx4hJMUuVg@mail.gmail.com>
 <51BF220E.10609@gmail.com> <51BF27C9.3080805@oles.biz>
 <CAC-wabvkXjdy2T12HR7rvi1C_WB9Y8N5Z8cYyEXFZzU3pRKMRQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <1371576870964-7584212.post@n2.nabble.com>
 <CAGZB7RgJxOkQVid2udc4bpjx7KJdj77HE_R12ZXEvhdri58X6A@mail.gmail.com>
 <1414014712599-7587287.post@n2.nabble.com>
From: Kevin Sutter <kwsutter@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 23 Oct 2014 10:53:53 -0500
Message-ID: 
 <CABH8erm4YhKA6iJObZazyZfvrHX_NG9pu16dr5=6BXgkSDHcLg@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: OpenJPA support for JPA 2.1: when?
To: users@openjpa.apache.org
Cc: dev@openjpa.apache.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a113b39ea8532cf0506191370
X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV using ClamSMTP

--001a113b39ea8532cf0506191370
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8

Hi,
Thanks for the note and reviving this thread...  We are well aware of
TomEE's desire for JPA 2.1 support in OpenJPA.  It would be great to see
JPA 2.1 support in OpenJPA.  But, the community contributions in this arena
have been slim.  This string of notes is one such plea, but there have been
others on users and dev mailing lists as well.

Although it has been pointed out that the majority of the current committer
set is from IBM (that part is true), we would greatly appreciate and
welcome contributions from anybody.  I don't think opening up the
committership to anybody who requests is a viable or valid solution.  I
think establishing some expertise by contributing patches (code, test,
docs, etc) is a valid process for establishing committer karma.

I had started the JPA 2.1 activity by documenting the high-level steps for
development:
http://openjpa.apache.org/jpa-2.1-tasks.html

But, as you can see, it's been pretty dormant.  Everybody involved with
Apache projects have "day jobs".  And, as a good friend of mine once
stated, "open source is not free".  So, if the JPA 2.1 support is required
by the OpenJPA community, then it's time for action.  As many of you know,
the OpenJPA solution is a very solid, well performing implementation of the
JPA specification.  But, we will need additional input to make the
implementation of JPA 2.1 real.

Just telling it like it is...
Kevin

On Wed, Oct 22, 2014 at 4:51 PM, tibor17 <tibordigana@apache.org> wrote:

> Hello guys,
>
> It looks like the TomEE server with Java EE 7 is waiting for OpenJPA
> release
> supporting JPA 2.1.
> How far is OpenJPA with JPA 2.1 support.
> I appreciate. Thx,
>
>
>
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://openjpa.208410.n2.nabble.com/OpenJPA-support-for-JPA-2-1-when-tp7584157p7587287.html
> Sent from the OpenJPA Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>

--001a113b39ea8532cf0506191370--