openjpa-users mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Rick Curtis <curti...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: Vote for standard JPA jar in maven
Date Fri, 15 Nov 2013 17:15:32 GMT
> CDDL is still not perfect and some apis are even LGPL (which is a
complete no-go).

CDDL? I thought that the javax.persistence files are EPL?


On Fri, Nov 15, 2013 at 1:30 AM, Mark Struberg <struberg@yahoo.de> wrote:

> The problem is usually not vendor neutrality but the license.
> CDDL is still not perfect and some apis are even LGPL (which is a complete
> no-go).
>
> Thus using our very own clean room engineered org.apache.geronimo.spec.*
> API jars is still the safest bet.
>
> LieGrue,
> strub
>
>
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> > From: Matthew Adams <matthew@matthewadams.me>
> > To: users@openjpa.apache.org; kundera-discuss@googlegroups.com
> > Cc:
> > Sent: Thursday, 14 November 2013, 17:47
> > Subject: Vote for standard JPA jar in maven
> >
> > Please vote for this issue, requesting that a standard, vendor-neutral
> JPA
> > jar be published.
> >
> > https://java.net/jira/browse/JPA_SPEC-60
> >
> > -matthew
> >
>



-- 
*Rick Curtis*

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message