openjpa-users mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Mark Struberg <strub...@yahoo.de>
Subject Re: Vote for standard JPA jar in maven
Date Fri, 15 Nov 2013 21:04:05 GMT
I was speaking about javax.* apis in general. 
JPA2.x are EPL, but JPA1 is CDDL, isn't?

In any case I prefer having our own IP clean spec jars.  It's just so much easier to not
having to check the licenses each time.

LieGrue,
strub




>________________________________
> From: Rick Curtis <curtisr7@gmail.com>
>To: users <users@openjpa.apache.org>; Mark Struberg <struberg@yahoo.de> 
>Sent: Friday, 15 November 2013, 18:15
>Subject: Re: Vote for standard JPA jar in maven
> 
>
>
>> CDDL is still not perfect and some apis are even LGPL (which is a complete no-go).
>
>
>CDDL? I thought that the javax.persistence files are EPL?
>
>
>
>On Fri, Nov 15, 2013 at 1:30 AM, Mark Struberg <struberg@yahoo.de> wrote:
>
>The problem is usually not vendor neutrality but the license.
>>CDDL is still not perfect and some apis are even LGPL (which is a complete no-go).
>>
>>Thus using our very own clean room engineered org.apache.geronimo.spec.* API jars
is still the safest bet.
>>
>>LieGrue,
>>strub
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>----- Original Message -----
>>> From: Matthew Adams <matthew@matthewadams.me>
>>> To: users@openjpa.apache.org; kundera-discuss@googlegroups.com
>>> Cc:
>>> Sent: Thursday, 14 November 2013, 17:47
>>> Subject: Vote for standard JPA jar in maven
>>>
>>> Please vote for this issue, requesting that a standard, vendor-neutral JPA
>>> jar be published.
>>>
>>> https://java.net/jira/browse/JPA_SPEC-60
>>>
>>> -matthew
>>>
>>
>
>
>
>-- 
>Rick Curtis
>
>
>
Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message