Mailing-List: contact users-help@openjpa.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: users@openjpa.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of maxtorzito@gmail.com designates
 209.85.217.181 as permitted sender)
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <1368636663892-7583921.post@n2.nabble.com>
References: <1368636663892-7583921.post@n2.nabble.com>
Date: Wed, 15 May 2013 12:23:43 -0500
Message-ID: 
 <CAPyf0ge_BcwGZk29Mx9Jq7YcLK=Bix=7Rs5j-=bDuqG4eq18Bw@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Persist detached entities into a memory database
From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Jos=E9_Luis_Cetina?= <maxtorzito@gmail.com>
To: users@openjpa.apache.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=089e0112bfd001df6f04dcc503c5

--089e0112bfd001df6f04dcc503c5
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Why you dont use merge?


2013/5/15 Guillaume Chauvet <guillaume.chauvet@qualiformed.com>

> Dear OpenJPA Users,
>
> We face a particular use case: we want to persist some entities that were
> previously detached into a virtual database (derby memory mode).
> Unfortunately, if we try to persist these entities that already have Ids
> annoted with @GeneratedValue[1], OpenJPA refuses to persist these (expect=
ed
> default behaviour).
>
> Is there a way in order to recreate a memory-based database with previous=
ly
> detached entities ?
>
> [1] We use a Timestamp generator for ID values.
>
> Regards,
> Guillaume
>
>
>
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://openjpa.208410.n2.nabble.com/Persist-detached-entities-into-a-memo=
ry-database-tp7583921.html
> Sent from the OpenJPA Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>


--=20
-------------------------------------------------------------------
*SCJA. Jos=E9 Luis Cetina*
-------------------------------------------------------------------

--089e0112bfd001df6f04dcc503c5--