Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-openjpa-users-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-openjpa-users-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 2021CECE5 for ; Fri, 15 Feb 2013 09:17:06 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 71826 invoked by uid 500); 15 Feb 2013 09:17:05 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-openjpa-users-archive@openjpa.apache.org Received: (qmail 71673 invoked by uid 500); 15 Feb 2013 09:17:05 -0000 Mailing-List: contact users-help@openjpa.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: users@openjpa.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list users@openjpa.apache.org Received: (qmail 71646 invoked by uid 99); 15 Feb 2013 09:17:04 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 15 Feb 2013 09:17:04 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.0 required=5.0 tests=SPF_NEUTRAL,URI_HEX X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: 216.139.250.139 is neither permitted nor denied by domain of marc.walter@sbb.ch) Received: from [216.139.250.139] (HELO joe.nabble.com) (216.139.250.139) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 15 Feb 2013 09:16:58 +0000 Received: from jim.nabble.com ([192.168.236.80]) by joe.nabble.com with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1U6HPJ-0008H3-Ob for users@openjpa.apache.org; Fri, 15 Feb 2013 01:16:37 -0800 Date: Fri, 15 Feb 2013 01:16:37 -0800 (PST) From: mwalter To: users@openjpa.apache.org Message-ID: <1360919797745-7582847.post@n2.nabble.com> In-Reply-To: References: <1359986440982-7582703.post@n2.nabble.com> Subject: Re: Different version incrementation behavior (or bug?) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Hi Kevin, thanks a lot for your answer and for providing some useful links. Unfortunately I could not find anything related to our problem in the documented inconsistencies and issues. In the meanwhile I created a little test project on GitHub which shows the problems I mentioned above. Maybe you find some time to have a look at. The JUnit test cases are green for OpenJPA 1.2.2 but as soon as you switch to OpenJPA 2.2.1 (by editing the pom.xml) test results change. Well, maybe I should have written the asserts to show green using OpenJPA 2.2.1 instead. In our opinion OpenJPA 2.2.1 behaves correctly regarding version incrementation when performing list operations like adding or removing. -- View this message in context: http://openjpa.208410.n2.nabble.com/Different-version-incrementation-behavior-or-bug-tp7582703p7582847.html Sent from the OpenJPA Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.