openjpa-users mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Rick Curtis <curti...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: audit?
Date Wed, 12 Sep 2012 14:11:09 GMT
Jim -

Sorry this one fell off my radar... I'll try to get to it today.

On Wed, Sep 12, 2012 at 7:09 AM, Jim Talbut <jtalbut@spudsoft.co.uk> wrote:

> On 12/09/2012 02:37, Pinaki Poddar wrote:
>
>> OpenJPA audit allows the user to choose how the audit records are
>> treated. It
>> does not make any decision to store the audited record to be stored in the
>> same database. But that is entirely possible because the audit record
>> carries the states of the persistent object when it entered the persistent
>> context and when it is ready to be committed. However, OpenJPA audit allow
>> the audit record be stored in an entoirely different database or schema as
>> well.
>>
> I'm not sure what message Pinaki is replying to, but I would urge caution
> when using the OpenJPA audit at the moment:
>
> https://issues.apache.org/**jira/browse/OPENJPA-2253<https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OPENJPA-2253>
>
> This causes a memory leak of every auditable object, which will eventually
> kill any process.
> We've had to remove all @Auditable annotations for the time being.
>
> Jim
>
>
>


-- 
*Rick Curtis*

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message