Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-openjpa-users-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-openjpa-users-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id A607877FA for ; Tue, 6 Sep 2011 16:45:50 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 19015 invoked by uid 500); 6 Sep 2011 16:45:50 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-openjpa-users-archive@openjpa.apache.org Received: (qmail 18879 invoked by uid 500); 6 Sep 2011 16:45:49 -0000 Mailing-List: contact users-help@openjpa.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: users@openjpa.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list users@openjpa.apache.org Received: (qmail 18871 invoked by uid 99); 6 Sep 2011 16:45:49 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 06 Sep 2011 16:45:49 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=4.2 required=5.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE,SPF_NEUTRAL,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL,URI_HEX X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: 216.139.236.26 is neither permitted nor denied by domain of ljnelson@gmail.com) Received: from [216.139.236.26] (HELO sam.nabble.com) (216.139.236.26) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 06 Sep 2011 16:45:43 +0000 Received: from jim.nabble.com ([192.168.236.80]) by sam.nabble.com with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1R0ym3-0003rk-1r for users@openjpa.apache.org; Tue, 06 Sep 2011 09:45:23 -0700 Date: Tue, 6 Sep 2011 09:45:23 -0700 (PDT) From: ljnelson To: users@openjpa.apache.org Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Subject: Re: Running PCEnhancer on a pile of classes that are not all entities MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_Part_158478_24175653.1315327523045" X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org ------=_Part_158478_24175653.1315327523045 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Tue, Sep 6, 2011 at 12:24 PM, Michael Dick [via OpenJPA] < ml-node+6764535-652757152-155969@n2.nabble.com> wrote: > Typical applications will interact with entities (PersistenceCapable > classes) through the accessor and mutator methods anyway, so any > modifications should be a no-op. But the potential for modification is > there. Thanks. Best, Laird -- http://about.me/lairdnelson -- View this message in context: http://openjpa.208410.n2.nabble.com/Running-PCEnhancer-on-a-pile-of-classes-that-are-not-all-entities-tp6759518p6764636.html Sent from the OpenJPA Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ------=_Part_158478_24175653.1315327523045--