Return-Path: 
 <users-return-9064-apmail-openjpa-users-archive=openjpa.apache.org@openjpa.apache.org>
X-Original-To: apmail-openjpa-users-archive@minotaur.apache.org
Delivered-To: apmail-openjpa-users-archive@minotaur.apache.org
Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3])
	by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id EEB1A4628
	for <apmail-openjpa-users-archive@minotaur.apache.org>;
 Wed,  8 Jun 2011 17:35:13 +0000 (UTC)
Received: (qmail 1990 invoked by uid 500); 8 Jun 2011 17:35:13 -0000
Delivered-To: apmail-openjpa-users-archive@openjpa.apache.org
Received: (qmail 1958 invoked by uid 500); 8 Jun 2011 17:35:13 -0000
Mailing-List: contact users-help@openjpa.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:users-help@openjpa.apache.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:users-unsubscribe@openjpa.apache.org>
List-Post: <mailto:users@openjpa.apache.org>
List-Id: <users.openjpa.apache.org>
Reply-To: users@openjpa.apache.org
Delivered-To: mailing list users@openjpa.apache.org
Received: (qmail 1950 invoked by uid 99); 8 Jun 2011 17:35:13 -0000
Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136)
    by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 08 Jun 2011 17:35:13 +0000
X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.8 required=5.0
	tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,RFC_ABUSE_POST,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL,URI_HEX
X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of kwsutter@gmail.com designates
 209.85.214.46 as permitted sender)
Received: from [209.85.214.46] (HELO mail-bw0-f46.google.com) (209.85.214.46)
    by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 08 Jun 2011 17:35:08 +0000
Received: by bwz15 with SMTP id 15so983717bwz.33
        for <users@openjpa.apache.org>; Wed, 08 Jun 2011 10:34:46 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
        h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date
         :message-id:subject:to:content-type;
        bh=25xAPET0O75+2cIkyTvfnFcZDt4JIoHWU+2yrrtfymY=;
        b=EmmePbKTQNHzY8nO+8ND3ZKOs55MtLDnYiz44UKitVR84/F50fn+1Cgcl68GnwcG74
         P+lw+AZwhL9bWslsAoNf2L49V47Mo7ImZpFjYkaTs0zX6QmBp09L4yirWhkG3v9jN6u5
         V9foYJPk9ONJoV6kLlcp+2QwAfe6T8mia0CwI=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
        h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to
         :content-type;
        b=nMO80Ji0mCQELv62yGbZSAznnoxYoxrB/VXZR7QKTjYWL5gcTmfiv+arHBUldRUctE
         +9NsAoNW0w6t0iOM2QoMdnoDUc5WNKwXH3/pXPBnm5KeTL32mnYAn1m+53FuGJcPzhJx
         qB74L3x//MLHQxbyn2sTnyVRvGaYQzH9VK/bM=
Received: by 10.204.16.216 with SMTP id p24mr800631bka.5.1307554477678; Wed,
 08 Jun 2011 10:34:37 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.204.46.65 with HTTP; Wed, 8 Jun 2011 10:34:17 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <1307552198828-6454495.post@n2.nabble.com>
References: <1307462348265-6450246.post@n2.nabble.com>
 <1307462649789-6450263.post@n2.nabble.com>
 <1307480778317-6451381.post@n2.nabble.com>
 <1307490331482-6451867.post@n2.nabble.com>
 <BANLkTimhXErhQPTptpzE+czZjQgAOg1Fyw@mail.gmail.com>
 <1307552198828-6454495.post@n2.nabble.com>
From: Kevin Sutter <kwsutter@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 8 Jun 2011 12:34:17 -0500
Message-ID: <BANLkTinHcuUe1GPOY18tRqFeNfH4=odOiQ@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: may be OpenJPA limitation
To: users@openjpa.apache.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=0003255552362aa02304a536c0c5

--0003255552362aa02304a536c0c5
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1

Okay, but getting back to Jeremy's comment, the SQLCODE of -240 means that
the referenced item is missing:

SQL0204N "<name>" is an undefined name.

And, <name> from your posted error message is this:  DBSCHEMA.USER

Since the SQL we generated is using the table like this (FROM User t0),
maybe there's an issue with delimited identifiers?  How are you defining
your Entity?  If all by annotations, please post that code snippet.  If you
are also using xml, please post that as well.  Thanks.

Kevin

On Wed, Jun 8, 2011 at 11:56 AM, chintan4181 <chintan4181@gmail.com> wrote:

> DBSchema exists in DB2 and same code is working fine for EclipseLink
> provider.
>
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://openjpa.208410.n2.nabble.com/may-be-OpenJPA-limitation-tp6450246p6454495.html
> Sent from the OpenJPA Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>

--0003255552362aa02304a536c0c5--