Return-Path: 
 <users-return-8777-apmail-openjpa-users-archive=openjpa.apache.org@openjpa.apache.org>
Delivered-To: apmail-openjpa-users-archive@minotaur.apache.org
Received: (qmail 93694 invoked from network); 9 Apr 2011 23:19:07 -0000
Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3)
  by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 9 Apr 2011 23:19:07 -0000
Received: (qmail 83946 invoked by uid 500); 9 Apr 2011 23:19:06 -0000
Delivered-To: apmail-openjpa-users-archive@openjpa.apache.org
Received: (qmail 83916 invoked by uid 500); 9 Apr 2011 23:19:06 -0000
Mailing-List: contact users-help@openjpa.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:users-help@openjpa.apache.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:users-unsubscribe@openjpa.apache.org>
List-Post: <mailto:users@openjpa.apache.org>
List-Id: <users.openjpa.apache.org>
Reply-To: users@openjpa.apache.org
Delivered-To: mailing list users@openjpa.apache.org
Received: (qmail 83908 invoked by uid 99); 9 Apr 2011 23:19:06 -0000
Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230)
    by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 09 Apr 2011 23:19:06 +0000
X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.7 required=5.0
	tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL
X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of fergusonjason@gmail.com
 designates 209.85.214.174 as permitted sender)
Received: from [209.85.214.174] (HELO mail-iw0-f174.google.com)
 (209.85.214.174)
    by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 09 Apr 2011 23:19:00 +0000
Received: by iwn34 with SMTP id 34so6191541iwn.33
        for <users@openjpa.apache.org>; Sat, 09 Apr 2011 16:18:39 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
        h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date
         :message-id:subject:from:to:content-type;
        bh=BYm1gcvRsiNVCHCVftOoF+AiVhVooa8Jm8NcomxG83A=;
        b=OurvcELAwzva/MRCY3t5/0L1QiI/srkDdM+u8x6eXSDtEd79CLCpPsFXmR4Y5B3/oG
         FK0dxHDaBaDJ3+j6a7SaRet67nnaVdSj6PxE4P1xuKEHx7AQtAA3L7XpBsROi7szSCnl
         tEr8icPOIYgZD4jCm5YtpbIzXn7A6zxTKXn88=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
        h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to
         :content-type;
        b=buDk6yq2Ut3GRt7muQ+01mA3TjRICbT0hpeNeF21V3GVnInsDUBOKqmC4E9ubCFBs6
         oUfMJyx/swXH2+p1dbaVOQ/AQ8hGUvQHz6GNSwCKTrkYoWWS0vbT/VoxWEBJm/eyv2l5
         /4jCc/3dS9lOxiBu94GfrhYhKj/09B7rpY7zE=
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.43.70.138 with SMTP id yg10mr2317967icb.495.1302391118163;
 Sat, 09 Apr 2011 16:18:38 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.42.197.65 with HTTP; Sat, 9 Apr 2011 16:18:38 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <BANLkTimKx-c+oJ9i5o00VGUU8_kZWsPjrg@mail.gmail.com>
References: <BANLkTimqj6ifW5DVrrau6Eye2NogpED3Kw@mail.gmail.com>
	<BANLkTimKx-c+oJ9i5o00VGUU8_kZWsPjrg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 9 Apr 2011 18:18:38 -0500
Message-ID: <BANLkTinU0c4RS6_XydeD-CVpWXHLufxbYg@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: OpenJPA and GWT Serialization
From: Jason Ferguson <fergusonjason@gmail.com>
To: users@openjpa.apache.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org

I'm running with 2.1.0.  I figured if I was going to learn to use JPA
versus Hibernate, I may as well use the most current version.

So let me see if I'm doing this right. I added the following property
to persistence.xml:

<property name="openjpa.DetachState" value="loaded(LiteAutoDetach=true)" />

The docs seem to recommend adding a version field, which I haven't
done yet. I also choose "loaded" versus "fetch-group" because I hadn't
defined any custom fetch groups.

With no offense intended towards the developers, I'm getting the
impression that OpenJPA is currently not the right choice for a GWT
project, until this particular issue is resolved.

Jason


On Sat, Apr 9, 2011 at 7:43 AM, Rick Curtis <curtisr7@gmail.com> wrote:
> Jason -
>
>> Sorry if this is a frequently asked question.
> This isn't a frequent question... yet. It seems that this issue has come up
> a number of times on users/dev. There was a recent post[1] on a similar
> issue that didn't end with much of a solution. Mike has had this
> detach/proxy business on his list of things he wanted to do for quite a
> time... :-)
>
> What version of OpenJPA are you running with?
>
> If you're running 2.0.0 or later and you're in need of a workaround in the
> short term.... and depending on how your application is structured, enabling
> LiteAutoDetach[2] might get you by this problem. The only reason I'm
> suggesting this property as I know that it will remove all proxies on
> EntityManager.close().
>
> [1] http://openjpa.markmail.org/thread/sczpivhncne27co4
> [2]
> http://openjpa.apache.org/builds/latest/docs/manual/manual.html#ref_guide_detach_state---
> openjpa.DetachState=loaded(LiteAutoDetach=true)
>
> Thanks,
> Rick
>
> On Sat, Apr 9, 2011 at 6:55 AM, Jason Ferguson <fergusonjason@gmail.com>wrote:
>
>> Sorry if this is a frequently asked question.
>>
>> I have an entity, Location, which has a bidirectional
>> OneToMany/ManyToOne relationship with another entity, BorderPoint.
>> Both entities implement Serializable and IsSerializable.
>>
>> The BorderPoint collection within the Location object is an ArrayList.
>> Unfortunately, OpenJPA uses a proxy class which is not serializable by
>> GWT. I've tried annotating both entities with
>> @DetachedState(enabled=true) with no luck.
>>
>> Can anyone assist?
>>
>> Jason
>>
>