Return-Path: 
 <users-return-8575-apmail-openjpa-users-archive=openjpa.apache.org@openjpa.apache.org>
Delivered-To: apmail-openjpa-users-archive@minotaur.apache.org
Received: (qmail 97564 invoked from network); 1 Mar 2011 20:08:48 -0000
Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3)
  by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 1 Mar 2011 20:08:48 -0000
Received: (qmail 3085 invoked by uid 500); 1 Mar 2011 20:08:48 -0000
Delivered-To: apmail-openjpa-users-archive@openjpa.apache.org
Received: (qmail 3059 invoked by uid 500); 1 Mar 2011 20:08:47 -0000
Mailing-List: contact users-help@openjpa.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:users-help@openjpa.apache.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:users-unsubscribe@openjpa.apache.org>
List-Post: <mailto:users@openjpa.apache.org>
List-Id: <users.openjpa.apache.org>
Reply-To: users@openjpa.apache.org
Delivered-To: mailing list users@openjpa.apache.org
Received: (qmail 3051 invoked by uid 99); 1 Mar 2011 20:08:47 -0000
Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230)
    by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 01 Mar 2011 20:08:47 +0000
X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.5 required=5.0
	tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL
X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of michael.d.dick@gmail.com
 designates 209.85.213.174 as permitted sender)
Received: from [209.85.213.174] (HELO mail-yx0-f174.google.com)
 (209.85.213.174)
    by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 01 Mar 2011 20:08:39 +0000
Received: by yxs7 with SMTP id 7so2498132yxs.33
        for <users@openjpa.apache.org>; Tue, 01 Mar 2011 12:08:18 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
        h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date
         :message-id:subject:to:content-type;
        bh=7Wjt/V+osP02dw+DKM08Vz6MzEeziB3Fu87SHRY4A/w=;
        b=rKjZch6CviAzq20ZqXhyQCQ3G9e8NUexxMGzoNJuO1KJ67znE+KSMFrx8918Xc+qfv
         6x0n3YMZIqSL+XL41NPDqFMLej66ZvCeerJn9C+wrIAB09Xm4/8KOmIXXdDxI0VEKTih
         bA1ECWgsfcB93C7Yk4qC7us78Q/c2QKM53ul4=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
        h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to
         :content-type;
        b=Hm3TP8RCM7lM8X9dBQ7df7cD9rtQVFU7e02d6YLs1tShNGSxgUuo/VUr3M/RtWPJwq
         3vfW5jRa/3yAp/eme4uXRhrXpzF5iXBLUWNiv+V5XH+QjGs4khrT9WW+fmbhBj1XONyZ
         hM/9eNL58c3LEodxcvvWIzYdAPY3xaMwZ//TU=
Received: by 10.90.67.16 with SMTP id p16mr9715728aga.141.1299010098076; Tue,
 01 Mar 2011 12:08:18 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.90.9.18 with HTTP; Tue, 1 Mar 2011 12:07:58 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTinDicoHgMyc6JEhZg4-Kdn7pP12WQJGk9MthXSN@mail.gmail.com>
References: <1298997265535-6077834.post@n2.nabble.com>
 <AANLkTimQ-yJ+ieyvDK6tk-rBYGi9=uGgw3c3vqd-qkDh@mail.gmail.com>
 <AANLkTinDicoHgMyc6JEhZg4-Kdn7pP12WQJGk9MthXSN@mail.gmail.com>
From: Michael Dick <michael.d.dick@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 1 Mar 2011 14:07:58 -0600
Message-ID: <AANLkTi=aemJD1KBKEKPBCFig-1NxBZaOgxenSWsEqBog@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: 2.1.0 from maven repository woes
To: users@openjpa.apache.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=0016362834f6749bcf049d715bb4
X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org

--0016362834f6749bcf049d715bb4
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1

I took another look and it looks like two different sequence classes are
bound to the alias "native". The one you want is NativeJDBSeq, but setting
that will run you into
OPENJPA-1642<https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OPENJPA-1642>.


A workaround suggested in the JIRA issue is to use build time enhancement,
and explicitly set the sequence to
  <property name="openjpa.Sequence"
value="org.apache.openjpa.jdbc.kernel.NativeJDBCSeq(your values go here)" />

In any case, the real fix for this problem lies with OPENJPA-1642, hopefully
the workaround will get you past the immediate problem though.

-mike

On Tue, Mar 1, 2011 at 11:32 AM, Michael Dick <michael.d.dick@gmail.com>wrote:

> Hi Krysztof,
>
> I'm not entirely sure how this ever worked for you. The TimeSequence class
> does not accept Allocate as a configuration option. I went back and tried
> with 2.0.1, 1.2.2, and 2.1.0 and got the error you posted.
>
> Could the openjpa.Schema property have changed when you upgraded?
>
> -mike
>
>
> On Tue, Mar 1, 2011 at 11:13 AM, Rick Curtis <curtisr7@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Krysztof -
>>
>> Are you using build time enhancement or are you using the dynamic
>> enhancement agent? If you don't know the answer to this question, you are
>> probably using the dynamic agent. If that is the case, I'd recommend
>> trying
>> to setup your build to use build time enhancement(Let me know if you want
>> some links). If you're already doing build time enhancement, please set
>> the
>> property openjpa.DynamicEnhancementAgent=false. Also, set
>> openjpa.RuntimeUnenhancedClasses=unsupported.
>>
>> I've found in my test environment that from time to time the Sun javaagent
>> fails for no apparent reason.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Rick
>>
>
>

--0016362834f6749bcf049d715bb4--