openjpa-users mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Pinaki Poddar <ppod...@apache.org>
Subject Re: OpenJPA usage at Apache James
Date Wed, 23 Jun 2010 17:04:25 GMT

Hi,
The "mappedBy" mapping on abstract class should work and the relations need
not be redefined in the concrete subclass.
But a critical bug on MappedSuperclass had been found recently -- which *may
be* impacting the mapping.

1. Which OpenJPA revision being used? 
$ java -jar /path/to/openjpa.jar 
shows the revision number.

2. If the used revision is prior to 952893 (dated June 8,2010), is it
possible to switch to a post-952893 version and see if that resolves the
issue?

3. Can you please post the relevant entity classes (JPAMesaage etc.) for
further analysis?



-----
Pinaki 
-- 
View this message in context: http://openjpa.208410.n2.nabble.com/OpenJPA-usage-at-Apache-James-tp5205652p5214230.html
Sent from the OpenJPA Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Mime
View raw message