Return-Path: 
 <users-return-6756-apmail-openjpa-users-archive=openjpa.apache.org@openjpa.apache.org>
Delivered-To: apmail-openjpa-users-archive@minotaur.apache.org
Received: (qmail 17230 invoked from network); 11 Mar 2010 20:46:52 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3)
  by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 11 Mar 2010 20:46:52 -0000
Received: (qmail 34591 invoked by uid 500); 11 Mar 2010 20:46:17 -0000
Delivered-To: apmail-openjpa-users-archive@openjpa.apache.org
Received: (qmail 34540 invoked by uid 500); 11 Mar 2010 20:46:16 -0000
Mailing-List: contact users-help@openjpa.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:users-help@openjpa.apache.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:users-unsubscribe@openjpa.apache.org>
List-Post: <mailto:users@openjpa.apache.org>
List-Id: <users.openjpa.apache.org>
Reply-To: users@openjpa.apache.org
Delivered-To: mailing list users@openjpa.apache.org
Received: (qmail 34120 invoked by uid 99); 11 Mar 2010 20:46:16 -0000
Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230)
    by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 11 Mar 2010 20:46:16 +0000
X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.7 required=10.0
	tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_NEUTRAL,UNPARSEABLE_RELAY
X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org
Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy)
Received: from [76.13.13.40] (HELO smtp101.prem.mail.ac4.yahoo.com)
 (76.13.13.40)
    by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with SMTP; Thu, 11 Mar 2010 20:46:09 +0000
Received: (qmail 57229 invoked from network); 11 Mar 2010 20:45:47 -0000
Received: from bi01p1.nc.us.ibm.com (dwoods@129.33.49.251 with plain)
        by smtp101.prem.mail.ac4.yahoo.com with SMTP;
 11 Mar 2010 12:45:47 -0800 PST
X-Yahoo-SMTP: sCI.ryiswBB7FW.DxjU523c87MI-
X-YMail-OSG: 
 0FuNe3AVM1kjiyPzpT0sHoCR35F7.BUYQzDgs3JMIxRdyNAFKMnwWypRPSm2JwVS73WslxkLGb.m6gTbR7dWXX7nW9omQwit65.IytcIedXmncDjSpWyPa6EAmRAa6N5WkFkasWARLDNOnuexYZ0a.WBswlYEjhqOCy3J4G8vo4ZZW93tMABf13IMR8mVtJkPzfgy7cIDRKjfRnbutbKodz1RLChr7DvSAuWLuMimhHGVXD6Z8VE_PdUaGBTVRSRSo0b37xQFmEQXXgCtQBRRaBVAYvDv4Ynde1hGMCdhK3ExexSzO8l_4g-
X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: ymail-3
Message-ID: <4B99567A.8080606@apache.org>
Date: Thu, 11 Mar 2010 15:45:46 -0500
From: Donald Woods <dwoods@apache.org>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; en-US;
 rv:1.9.1.8) Gecko/20100227 Lightning/1.0b1 Thunderbird/3.0.3
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: users@openjpa.apache.org
Subject: Re: Refreshing detached entities
References: <A565AC04-BABA-470A-BDB4-B3867DBBB8B9@jerrycarter.org>
 <64427.91980.qm@web55901.mail.re3.yahoo.com>
 <1268338258319-4718371.post@n2.nabble.com>
In-Reply-To: <1268338258319-4718371.post@n2.nabble.com>
X-Enigmail-Version: 1.0.1
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org

Is Spring 3.0 supplying a JPA 1.0 implementation and/or API on the
classpath?

I'm not a Spring user, so no real help here...


-Donald


On 3/11/10 3:10 PM, No1UNo wrote:
> 
> Very interesting data point.  I just added a simple test to OPENJPA-1562, but
> that test contains Spring 3.0 and uses a RESOURCE_LOCAL <persistence-unit>. 
> I'll try eliminating Spring 3.0.