openjpa-users mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Kevin Sutter <kwsut...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: Database support
Date Fri, 15 May 2009 21:27:51 GMT
Hi Fay,
Yes, good catch.  I was thinking of that one when I was putting the list
together.  At this point, I would put SolidDB in the "Not Currently Covered"
category.  Thanks.

Kevin

On Fri, May 15, 2009 at 4:19 PM, Fay Wang <fyw300@yahoo.com> wrote:

>
> Hi Kevin,
>
> What about SolidDB? The memory-based relational database?
>
> --- On Fri, 5/15/09, Kevin Sutter <kwsutter@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > From: Kevin Sutter <kwsutter@gmail.com>
> > Subject: Re: Database support
> > To: users@openjpa.apache.org
> > Date: Friday, May 15, 2009, 2:09 PM
> > Okay, so I'm looking at our stated
> > database support [1].  From this chart, I
> > would divide up the databases into the following
> > categories.  The "Not
> > Currently Covered" category is where I would focus my
> > phishing efforts
> > first.  Any discussion?
> >
> > Covered Interest by members of OpenJPA Community
> > =======================================
> > o  Derby
> > o  DB2
> > o  Informix
> > o  Oracle
> > o  MS SQL Server ???
> > o  Sybase ???
> >
> >
> > Not Currently Covered Interest by members of OpenJPA
> > Community
> > =================================================
> > o  MySQL
> > o  PostgreSQL
> > o  H2
> > o  HSQLDB (Hypersonic)
> > o  Firebird ???
> >
> >
> > Are these still required?
> > =================
> > o  Borland Interbase
> > o  Borland JDataStore
> > o  Empress
> > o  Intersystems Cache
> > o  MS Access
> > o  MS Visual FoxPro
> > o  Pointbase
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Kevin
> >
> > [1]
> >
> http://openjpa.apache.org/builds/latest/docs/manual/manual.html#dbsupport
> >
> > On Thu, May 14, 2009 at 10:01 AM, David Beer <
> david.m.beer@googlemail.com>wrote:
> >
> > > Hi Kevin
> > >
> > > Some database vendors usually have some sort of
> > universal contact which
> > > might be the best way of going about it. Posting a one
> > of message to
> > > support forums might well be an idea that could work.
> > >
> > > David
> > >
> > > On Thu, 14 May 2009 08:46:03 -0500 Kevin Sutter
> > > <kwsutter@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > > Hi David,
> > > >
> > > > On Wed, May 13, 2009 at 5:10 PM, David Beer
> > > > <david.m.beer@googlemail.com>wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > Hi Kevin
> > > > >
> > > > > I currently use OpenJPA with the H2 database
> > for my embeded
> > > > > programs, and will be considering MySQL for
> > larger scale programs.
> > > > > I think that the more database vendors or
> > suppliers we can get
> > > > > links with the better for both sides. I am
> > happily using H2 with
> > > > > OpenJPA but there were some features I had
> > to ask about and how to
> > > > > work with OenJPA.
> > > > >
> > > > > So my point is that we need a way of getting
> > committers or users
> > > > > from both sides to help so we need a way of
> > maybe certifying a
> > > > > database version.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > It sounds like we're on the same page.  The
> > tricky part is signing up
> > > > this help and support from these database vendors
> > and users groups.
> > > > Maybe I should just post to these vendor's user
> > forums and ask for
> > > > some support. Just go phishing...  :-)
> > > >
> > > > Kevin
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > Jut my thoughts.
> > > > >
> > > > > David
> > > > >
> > > > > On Wed, 13 May 2009 16:36:53 -0500 Kevin
> > Sutter
> > > > > <kwsutter@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > Hi,
> > > > > > I'm trolling...  I'm looking for
> > ideas on how we can better
> > > > > > integrate with the various database
> > vendors.  Many of us
> > > > > > committers have our own "favorite"
> > databases due to our
> > > > > > employers' needs.  But, what about
> > the MySQL, or Postgres, or SQL
> > > > > > Server, or pick your favorite
> > databases?  I know we have had some
> > > > > > interest from these database vendors on
> > our users and dev forums,
> > > > > > but I'm looking for ways to get these
> > vendors more involved.
> > > > > > When they produce a new version of
> > their database, it would be
> > > > > > great to announce OpenJPA
> > support.  And, if they have new
> > > > > > features to take advantage of, that
> > would be even better.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Everybody's development and tests teams
> > are limited.  I understand
> > > > > > that. But, I'm looking for ideas on how
> > we can work together to
> > > > > > accomplish this task.  I'm going
> > to cross post on both users and
> > > > > > dev forums to see if there any lurkers
> > that might have some ideas.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Just to provide a real world
> > example...  I was just pinged about
> > > > > > MS SQL Server 2008 support.  Our
> > OpenJPA manual only documents SQL
> > > > > > Server 2005 support.  I don't have
> > experience with SQL Server.
> > > > > > So, it made me think how we could
> > improve this aspect of our
> > > > > > OpenJPA database support.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Any thoughts?
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Kevin
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > >
> > >
> >
>
>
>
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message