Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-openjpa-users-archive@locus.apache.org Received: (qmail 32755 invoked from network); 29 Sep 2008 19:15:30 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 29 Sep 2008 19:15:30 -0000 Received: (qmail 28148 invoked by uid 500); 29 Sep 2008 19:15:28 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-openjpa-users-archive@openjpa.apache.org Received: (qmail 28128 invoked by uid 500); 29 Sep 2008 19:15:28 -0000 Mailing-List: contact users-help@openjpa.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: users@openjpa.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list users@openjpa.apache.org Received: (qmail 28117 invoked by uid 99); 29 Sep 2008 19:15:28 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 29 Sep 2008 12:15:28 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of techhusky@gmail.com designates 209.85.132.242 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.132.242] (HELO an-out-0708.google.com) (209.85.132.242) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 29 Sep 2008 19:14:27 +0000 Received: by an-out-0708.google.com with SMTP id c36so116602ana.96 for ; Mon, 29 Sep 2008 12:15:01 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to :subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; bh=M5WJEwrLJPfdu5f8haAoRGUaGFzCPRk4UddwF+AK2MY=; b=HtYEh8IsSOX9ea2oV4hJ6Y5shd/iAO4ZUqRsaZPi9tsUMhrrQ9JuphousxQzJV4DuG 62dZhkuTZApY/K6jND3XUUkvR5Vai9szDBGA8+KbMz/FmcAib1ImASYg3J5q1OSo4+ZO DIqzejLSejLLb8YX33E22XJHs1GSmgqz4vFGM= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition :references; b=dBcWvyybur3bWKN0eDh6lKDekn5cgdRIMiNCIHBnBWIFnGVS282mIvjApmRoSbM3jb OeAN7ODbGCVc5n2tRySsZZVD9CNM5K7+LtoVg5mSVt8khPslAR9lA3djGRHLZFR9bg6z 34/GdO0TGit/Z5IapSKun/60SqHNRt6B6FDs0= Received: by 10.100.207.5 with SMTP id e5mr4746106ang.104.1222715701530; Mon, 29 Sep 2008 12:15:01 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.100.124.15 with HTTP; Mon, 29 Sep 2008 12:15:01 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Mon, 29 Sep 2008 14:15:01 -0500 From: "Jeremy Bauer" To: users@openjpa.apache.org Subject: Re: Non dirty entity version field update SUPER URGENT!!! In-Reply-To: <72c1350f0809291114y190730b2k9e625589bf748fe@mail.gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <1222416728946-1120307.post@n2.nabble.com> <1222422356890-1120452.post@n2.nabble.com> <72c1350f0809291114y190730b2k9e625589bf748fe@mail.gmail.com> X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org I too didn't have any luck reproducing the problem. I tried 1.2.x and 1.3.0. Using build-time an the agent enhancer, an update was only issued if a value was changed. However, runtime enhancement produced a version update. You may want to try disabling runtime/fallback enhancement by adding the property below to your persistence.xml. That's a simple way to check if your build-time enhancement worked correctly. If not, you'll get an exception indicating that an entity has not been enhanced. -Jeremy