Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-openjpa-users-archive@locus.apache.org Received: (qmail 31612 invoked from network); 14 Jul 2008 18:16:00 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 14 Jul 2008 18:16:00 -0000 Received: (qmail 43909 invoked by uid 500); 14 Jul 2008 18:16:00 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-openjpa-users-archive@openjpa.apache.org Received: (qmail 43895 invoked by uid 500); 14 Jul 2008 18:16:00 -0000 Mailing-List: contact users-help@openjpa.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: users@openjpa.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list users@openjpa.apache.org Received: (qmail 43884 invoked by uid 99); 14 Jul 2008 18:16:00 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 14 Jul 2008 11:16:00 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.2 required=10.0 tests=SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS,WHOIS_MYPRIVREG X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of lists+1214986160035-208411@n2.nabble.com designates 216.139.236.158 as permitted sender) Received: from [216.139.236.158] (HELO kuber.nabble.com) (216.139.236.158) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 14 Jul 2008 18:15:05 +0000 Received: from isper.nabble.com ([192.168.236.156]) by kuber.nabble.com with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1KISa8-0004tN-OG for users@openjpa.apache.org; Mon, 14 Jul 2008 11:15:28 -0700 Message-ID: <1216059328745-527706.post@n2.nabble.com> Date: Mon, 14 Jul 2008 11:15:28 -0700 (PDT) From: Pinaki Poddar To: users@openjpa.apache.org Subject: Re: no state snapshot available on embedded mapping In-Reply-To: <601062EC-08B9-47CD-8D06-B45F6B8D661F@logemann.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Nabble-From: ppoddar@apache.org References: <1216045354074-527331.post@n2.nabble.com> <601062EC-08B9-47CD-8D06-B45F6B8D661F@logemann.org> X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org What is the identity strategy used by the Order.class? While reproducing the error, that factor *seems* to be crucial than whether there is a embedded field. Can you verify if there is a change in behavior if Order.class uses datastore vs application identity? Marc Logemann-3 wrote: > > and yes, for the record: i changed to build time enhancement and now > embedded entities work. Still interessted in the "why" answer. > > -- > Marc Logemann > blog http://logemannreloaded.blogspot.com > privat http://www.logemann.org > > > > Am 14.07.2008 um 16:22 schrieb Pinaki Poddar: > >> >> Hi, >> Are you using runtime enhancement with Java 5? >> If yes, the immediate workaround is to enhance the persistent >> classes at >> build-time. >> >> -- >> View this message in context: >> http://n2.nabble.com/no-state-snapshot-available-on-embedded-mapping-tp526616p527331.html >> Sent from the OpenJPA Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com. >> > > > -- View this message in context: http://n2.nabble.com/no-state-snapshot-available-on-embedded-mapping-tp526616p527706.html Sent from the OpenJPA Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.