Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-openjpa-users-archive@locus.apache.org Received: (qmail 67257 invoked from network); 31 Jan 2008 22:46:24 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 31 Jan 2008 22:46:24 -0000 Received: (qmail 14112 invoked by uid 500); 31 Jan 2008 22:46:15 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-openjpa-users-archive@openjpa.apache.org Received: (qmail 14088 invoked by uid 500); 31 Jan 2008 22:46:15 -0000 Mailing-List: contact users-help@openjpa.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: users@openjpa.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list users@openjpa.apache.org Received: (qmail 14079 invoked by uid 99); 31 Jan 2008 22:46:15 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 31 Jan 2008 14:46:15 -0800 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.0 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of kwsutter@gmail.com designates 209.85.146.181 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.146.181] (HELO wa-out-1112.google.com) (209.85.146.181) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 31 Jan 2008 22:45:48 +0000 Received: by wa-out-1112.google.com with SMTP id m28so1276197wag.13 for ; Thu, 31 Jan 2008 14:45:55 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; bh=JSF/wdCv9Oj+tZsooIRztOhTI/blnAX1DP8bSzJuuO0=; b=VJEwIRKPHn7Oih0X3TqXH98cYfw0aZgXwl4bIkD/yhoEtUc3agDFwwhokywPIq4QMirgHT+f4kKLV3E50ddlGwmf8QNBRJ4JMGIs/iuoVmn9584N/IcU8nujCyeUkiIhxkEZvLQ2/vScjWhZsCmk26x7kVG+i4jX5Qhs9PSkZzE= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; b=DjxOg7B0FXpjbGZ3N/hBCd7XQbroRDNgds49mxrsOoWPDxI0m51HPyfwd4nEYnHKUMjHJet1c9xzZj1gJ/EGxv13J1z/IJ2sC5GOiMPKvuTy2GsggYHLNX9VJvLJ1mMRwrUTJGwg6H0f7SdjKtnh3XzrW0mu8mO+3gUtTgtuJKg= Received: by 10.114.111.1 with SMTP id j1mr3101257wac.138.1201819555097; Thu, 31 Jan 2008 14:45:55 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.114.75.18 with HTTP; Thu, 31 Jan 2008 14:45:55 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <89c0c52c0801311445n72c31766w96df464547cfaa16@mail.gmail.com> Date: Thu, 31 Jan 2008 16:45:55 -0600 From: "Kevin Sutter" To: users@openjpa.apache.org Subject: Re: major performance improvements between 0.9.7 and 1.0.X ? In-Reply-To: <1201812767.10593.3.camel@burns> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_Part_25345_24493174.1201819555088" References: <1201812767.10593.3.camel@burns> X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org ------=_Part_25345_24493174.1201819555088 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Hans, We did have several performance improvements in the 0.9.7 release, but we are continually looking at ways to improve the performance of OpenJPA (reference OPENJPA-407). So, I'm sure that the performance of 1.0.x is better than 0.9.7, but I can't pinpoint any specific updates or percentages. Are there specific areas that indicate "performance issues"? Thanks, Kevin On Jan 31, 2008 2:52 PM, Hans J. Prueller wrote: > hi there, > > we introduced usage of OpenJPA within our web application some time ago > with OpenJPA 0.9.7. Basically > the version is very stable and we did not upgrade up to now. Meanwhile we > extended usage of OpenJPA and > run into some performance issues ... just to know whether we should put > effort into upgrading: > > are there any significant performance improvements of the OpenJPA engine > between 0.9.7 and the current 1.0.X version? > > thanks in advance! > > hans > > > > ------=_Part_25345_24493174.1201819555088--