From dev-return-25953-apmail-openjpa-dev-archive=openjpa.apache.org@openjpa.apache.org Sat Feb 2 16:27:33 2019 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-openjpa-dev-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-openjpa-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 698731057F for ; Sat, 2 Feb 2019 16:27:33 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 37717 invoked by uid 500); 2 Feb 2019 16:27:33 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-openjpa-dev-archive@openjpa.apache.org Received: (qmail 37667 invoked by uid 500); 2 Feb 2019 16:27:33 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@openjpa.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@openjpa.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@openjpa.apache.org Received: (qmail 37646 invoked by uid 99); 2 Feb 2019 16:27:32 -0000 Received: from pnap-us-west-generic-nat.apache.org (HELO spamd1-us-west.apache.org) (209.188.14.142) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 02 Feb 2019 16:27:32 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by spamd1-us-west.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at spamd1-us-west.apache.org) with ESMTP id 0FDCBC88CF for ; Sat, 2 Feb 2019 16:27:32 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at spamd1-us-west.apache.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: 0.048 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.048 tagged_above=-999 required=6.31 tests=[DKIMWL_WL_MED=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT=0.25, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=disabled Authentication-Results: spamd1-us-west.apache.org (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com Received: from mx1-lw-us.apache.org ([10.40.0.8]) by localhost (spamd1-us-west.apache.org [10.40.0.7]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id zldwwdSOwYru for ; Sat, 2 Feb 2019 16:27:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-it1-f195.google.com (mail-it1-f195.google.com [209.85.166.195]) by mx1-lw-us.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at mx1-lw-us.apache.org) with ESMTPS id 99AFF61147 for ; Sat, 2 Feb 2019 16:27:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-it1-f195.google.com with SMTP id a6so14585712itl.4 for ; Sat, 02 Feb 2019 08:27:30 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :content-transfer-encoding; bh=tnoJKUipUbe3xj/nNNn/Dq4f6e5bnijZZ8DryBlNBM0=; b=ty7aJAV8MvyA3l62B0za0ZaasYK3q9DlcvQraACsIJfglII1oet4nEBERsc9r1+UZJ OVXo4JhiIYTYNby8r0ZnK2POYnZvb3pnazHOMdw/iHBJIie+ibf3WCNyXbmhpWFQjZIB Zl8QqZNTEB+dvRND4FGf2tVD+joS9pfkVAVgGx10ZcVzR7o6veb18kbe4nsS8n+WZcAw yOqEzshNg29hnu96Q3tVv1Oyvu8UzsRMQ7NfLKfUdRb5ntzqvFKrC2ZtDRi83UGgjGoE 7kbH5C65IhMCsEvHByNkpvivMsmrpfhc0c8V/Ng/ICDJU3uAANLxBcIFGJNdgOJYVXQz UH9A== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=tnoJKUipUbe3xj/nNNn/Dq4f6e5bnijZZ8DryBlNBM0=; b=D/wRZABz6xS1zZVsDAGTE/JKsp133oOy7FuRO/cO1tg8Ks70jyOJEX0sHrQNrKYda5 j7/Dv9alM8LAOno6IHcWuVyYD54rcDl39Iv3I+txzgJ7rS0qYCXb6fKec+/IxfVwxlSl VfNiRGoX5qoK1TifFwaysZd4IRP7k/Ykc8MT0zmgy/sB06e86YCz5St0qO18THW8QUF5 tsuTFdk8nMOagK2/9HaG/uvTjB8b2SWsyc/wS/K2BZ5UIB/ICMrFfWh7Soh69/bEZCPm Z9pzJsD8AvR9PhsOmvXPqaaNIi5uslDJkiADSQZyegT8Q2rtKTBLevj8tr+1nIaMKOto LiUQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AHQUAuawfl23K0Cs50kRmvXadatGGj1ZxZLmZTtf90pvYr0pf2pEQyY/ Tujh+WcUs30rgEV6nQL1qj8tnLrUd1PbNDcB/LCjxcaU X-Google-Smtp-Source: AHgI3IYeZ/ZYuj7GRFXt87gcFPfOXWq5J5Iv54A+7IVJOFem5+veNfREHuchpImtzWkSh9MSAz7MAjmnWyf+7s+qNc8= X-Received: by 2002:a24:9a84:: with SMTP id l126mr5381579ite.77.1549124849659; Sat, 02 Feb 2019 08:27:29 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: In-Reply-To: From: Maxim Solodovnik Date: Sat, 2 Feb 2019 23:27:18 +0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Backporting fixes also to 2.4.x? To: Openjpa-dev Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable IMO we have to decide if we going to support one major version or two of th= em As far as I can see there is not too much active devs on the project So it might be wise to support only latest version ... On Sat, 2 Feb 2019 at 23:23, Romain Manni-Bucau wro= te: > > +0 (I don't see 2.4 used here since most projects moved to 3 from my side > of the fence but no blocker to do it if anyone does) > > Romain Manni-Bucau > @rmannibucau | Blog > | Old Blog > | Github | > LinkedIn | Book > > > > Le sam. 2 f=C3=A9vr. 2019 =C3=A0 13:30, Francesco Chicchiricc=C3=B2 > a =C3=A9crit : > > > Il 2 febbraio 2019 12:12:54 CET, Mark Struberg > > ha scritto: > > >Hi folks! > > > > > >I've done quite a few fixes in the last few weeks. > > >Some related to new JPA-2.1/2.2 features, but others totally unrelated > > >to that. > > >Do we also want to port them back to OpenJPA-2.4.x? > > > > +1, thanks Mark. > > Regards. > > > > -- > > Francesco Chicchiricc=C3=B2 > > > > Tirasa - Open Source Excellence > > http://www.tirasa.net/ > > > > Member at The Apache Software Foundation Syncope, Cocoon, Olingo, CXF, > > OpenJPA, PonyMail > > http://home.apache.org/~ilgrosso/ > > --=20 WBR Maxim aka solomax