Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-openjpa-dev-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-openjpa-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 5443310ED6 for ; Fri, 30 May 2014 17:17:15 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 61093 invoked by uid 500); 30 May 2014 17:17:15 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-openjpa-dev-archive@openjpa.apache.org Received: (qmail 61052 invoked by uid 500); 30 May 2014 17:17:15 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@openjpa.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@openjpa.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@openjpa.apache.org Received: (qmail 61044 invoked by uid 99); 30 May 2014 17:17:15 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 30 May 2014 17:17:15 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.2 required=5.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of rmannibucau@gmail.com designates 209.85.192.54 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.192.54] (HELO mail-qg0-f54.google.com) (209.85.192.54) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 30 May 2014 17:17:11 +0000 Received: by mail-qg0-f54.google.com with SMTP id q108so6232809qgd.13 for ; Fri, 30 May 2014 10:16:50 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :content-type; bh=JPu6bQ6vXRely6h7qpVZRVD2vr7OY7uE1tKyPGWeKkU=; b=qfhtIDFF2vPqeOKA6/UHdR+KZ2FFTvdD+f5rhWx216SnMxa8TfEU9uf0FQ0Y58q1dK Jxsvr2vN6AQ7/5gLQrmd0BejrzUVKOY2GMjooQ5syizM/CKgkh82+6rQu8LKEATKeiYx 3m3MF7TSmiBSRYeu9UxxxixuZ5FSKfAcxvR4EphfD1I6KO9Om4tPLDUvHcV1+PhTNTEw Bxea32fxxFAOgiZy0MQFafIx9JZ5Tt1/OYBe4+8IlLmKpEVFcwxjKIZ6L+RLqPlqO5cy 635aPZiaTbLXNYdLaMErCg5fngmwTLkaQSB2kw6WoqMnyPAkoi4OI/15TcgBuk95/TL5 roLg== X-Received: by 10.140.37.49 with SMTP id q46mr21320320qgq.39.1401470210499; Fri, 30 May 2014 10:16:50 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.96.123.7 with HTTP; Fri, 30 May 2014 10:16:30 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: From: Romain Manni-Bucau Date: Fri, 30 May 2014 19:16:30 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Re: release or not? To: "dev@openjpa.apache.org" Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a11c1326a0f8d7004faa13699 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --001a11c1326a0f8d7004faa13699 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Side note 2: s/7/6/ in poms make openjpa 2.4.0 working with java 6 constraint ATM :) Well if nobody has enough time+karma for it we'll use our fork but this is really what we all want to avoid :( Romain Manni-Bucau Twitter: @rmannibucau Blog: http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/ LinkedIn: http://fr.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau Github: https://github.com/rmannibucau 2014-05-30 17:30 GMT+02:00 Jean-Louis MONTEIRO : > Side note, we are WebProfile 1.0 (Java EE 6) so we cannot embedded Java EE > 7 API (because it's checked in the certification tests). > Would be awesome to have a 2.4.0 still Java EE 6 compliant, which is mainly > a maintenant release and target Java EE 7 (ie. JPA 2.1) for a 2.5.0 or 3.0, > dunno. > > Jean-Louis > > > 2014-05-30 17:27 GMT+02:00 Jean-Louis MONTEIRO : > > > We are waiting for the 2.4.0 to support Java 8. > > That's the only library missing to release (OpenWebBeans, XBean have been > > released last week). > > > > Jean-Louis > > > > > > 2014-05-30 16:58 GMT+02:00 Kevin Sutter : > > > > Hi Romain, > >> I can't speak for everybody on our dev list, but I don't have the cycles > >> to > >> create an OpenJPA release just for TomEE. It sounds like we might need > >> more TomEE developers with OpenJPA karma to help out in this regard... > >> Hint, hint... :-) > >> > >> Just curious, which stream are you looking for a release from? The > 2.3.x > >> service stream, or the 2.4.0 trunk stream? If the latter, then you > >> realize > >> that this has been moved to require Java 7 in preparation for JPA 2.1 > and > >> the rest of Java EE? Does that matter to you? If you are looking for a > >> 2.3.x release, then I still have two outstanding Infra JIRAs for doing > the > >> nightly code and doc builds... > >> > >> Sorry that I can't be of more help, but we've had a few OpenJPA > developers > >> move onto other "day jobs" and their time on OpenJPA has dropped off > >> considerably... Just too much work for the people left... > >> > >> Kevin > >> > >> > >> On Fri, May 30, 2014 at 8:19 AM, Romain Manni-Bucau < > >> rmannibucau@gmail.com> > >> wrote: > >> > >> > Hi guys > >> > > >> > we asked few weeks ago if we could hope a release for tomee one and > you > >> > said us to fork but as we took a bit more time to prepare the release > as > >> > expected I ask again the question hoping something changed: do you > >> think an > >> > openjpa release is close? > >> > > >> > Our constraints are to let tomee be out in june so openjpa release > >> should > >> > be on vote next week (+- few days). > >> > > >> > wdyt? > >> > > >> > > >> > Romain Manni-Bucau > >> > Twitter: @rmannibucau > >> > Blog: http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/ > >> > LinkedIn: http://fr.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau > >> > Github: https://github.com/rmannibucau > >> > > >> > > > > > > > > -- > > Jean-Louis > > > > > > -- > Jean-Louis > --001a11c1326a0f8d7004faa13699--