openjpa-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Jason Zwolak (JIRA)" <j...@apache.org>
Subject [jira] [Created] (OPENJPA-2457) ReverseMappingTool.getClassName(...) should be public or have a public equivalent just like getFieldName(...).
Date Thu, 21 Nov 2013 22:57:35 GMT
Jason Zwolak created OPENJPA-2457:
-------------------------------------

             Summary: ReverseMappingTool.getClassName(...) should be public or have a public
equivalent just like getFieldName(...).
                 Key: OPENJPA-2457
                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OPENJPA-2457
             Project: OpenJPA
          Issue Type: Bug
          Components: jdbc
    Affects Versions: 2.4.0
            Reporter: Jason Zwolak
            Priority: Minor


While creating an implementation of ReverseCustomizer I came across tables that are not mapped
and passed to MyReverseCustomizer.unmappedTable(...) method.  I would like to map the tables
in much the same way the ReverseMappingTool would if it could map the tables; therefore, I'd
like to use the same name converter implemented in getClassName.  getFieldName is public so
I can map the fields the same as the ReverseMappingTool, so why not getClassName?



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.1#6144)

Mime
View raw message