openjpa-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Rick Curtis <curti...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache OpenJPA-2.3.0
Date Thu, 21 Nov 2013 16:50:25 GMT
+1


On Thu, Nov 21, 2013 at 10:35 AM, Kevin Sutter <kwsutter@gmail.com> wrote:

> Thanks, Mark!
>
> +1, I'm satisfied
>
> Thanks for your work!
>
>
> On Thu, Nov 21, 2013 at 9:56 AM, Mark Struberg <struberg@yahoo.de> wrote:
>
> > Seems I was right. Even in the US here was a ruling a few years ago that
> a
> > 'till' license year is only effective if it is an 'explicit' copyright
> > owner change. Otherwise the last copyright owner remains unchanged. We do
> > not 'loose' our copyrights by not updating the year. This is also
> d'accord
> > with the infro from e.g. [1].
> > Thus not a show stopper.
> >
> > I've also added my KEY now [2].
> >
> >
> > LieGrue,
> > strub
> >
> >
> > [1] http://markmail.org/message/brcxq7fw3krsnvrm
> >
> > [2] https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/openjpa/KEYS
> >
> >
> >
> > >________________________________
> > > From: Mark Struberg <struberg@yahoo.de>
> > >To: Kevin Sutter <kwsutter@gmail.com>; openjpa-dev <
> > dev@openjpa.apache.org>
> > >Sent: Thursday, 21 November 2013, 16:35
> > >Subject: Re: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache OpenJPA-2.3.0
> > >
> > >
> > >whoops, sorry did mea to send the previous mail to the list. But you
> > know, mobile phones ...
> > >
> > >I'm not yet sure about the ref date. But as this is still not changed in
> > many projects I hardly think it's a blocker.
> > >From a pure law pov it makes no difference for EU and in the US it is
> imo
> > only a problem if we explcitly abandon the marks.
> > >
> > >We should in any case update the docs in our trunk. That might be
> enough.
> > Will check the mailing  about the copyright date being a showstopper to
> be
> > sure.
> > >
> > >LieGrue,
> > >strub
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >>________________________________
> > >
> > >> From: Kevin Sutter <kwsutter@gmail.com>
> > >>To: Mark Struberg <struberg@yahoo.de>
> > >>Sent: Thursday, 21 November 2013, 16:14
> > >>Subject: Re: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache OpenJPA-2.3.0
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>Thanks, Mark.  The javadoc looks good.  What did you find out about the
> > copyright dates?  Is the 2012 reference (vs 2013) a blocker?
> > >>
> > >>Kevin
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>On Thu, Nov 21, 2013 at 9:05 AM, Mark Struberg <struberg@yahoo.de>
> > wrote:
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>>
> > >>>no need to restart. the 72h are only a min length.
> > >>>
> > >>>LG m
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>>------------------------------
> > >>>Kevin Sutter schrieb am Do., 21. Nov 2013 15:41 MEZ:
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>>>Hi Mark,
> > >>>>Thanks for the javadoc.  I'll take a look shortly...
> > >>>>
> > >>>>Question on the release process...  Since we are over the 72 hour
> > window,
> > >>>>do we need to cancel the first vote and start over?  I don't know
how
> > picky
> > >>>>the process is in this regard, but I think we've had to do that
in
> the
> > past
> > >>>>with "slow votes"...
> > >>>>
> > >>>>Thanks, Kevin
> > >>>>
> > >>>>
> > >>>>On Thu, Nov 21, 2013 at 8:00 AM, Mark Struberg <struberg@yahoo.de>
> > wrote:
> > >>>>
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> Hi folks!
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> Sorry that it took me so long. I've now generated the JavaDocs
from
> > the
> > >>>>> tag and uploaded it to my people account
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>
> >
> http://people.apache.org/~struberg/openjpa/openjpa-parent-2.3.0-javadoc.jar
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> txs and LieGrue,
> > >>>>> strub
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> >________________________________
> > >>>>> > From: Mark Struberg <struberg@yahoo.de>
> > >>>>> >To: Kevin Sutter <kwsutter@gmail.com>; "dev@openjpa.apache.org"
<
> > >>>>> dev@openjpa.apache.org>
> > >>>>> >Sent: Monday, 18 November 2013, 17:02
> > >>>>> >Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache OpenJPA-2.3.0
> > >>>>> >
> > >>>>> >
> > >>>>> >Sure I understand. Just being a bit under stress @ $dayjob.
Will
> > try to
> > >>>>> ship this in the evening.
> > >>>>> >
> > >>>>> >LieGrue,
> > >>>>> >strub
> > >>>>> >
> > >>>>> >
> > >>>>> >
> > >>>>> >
> > >>>>> >________________________________
> > >>>>> >
> > >>>>> > From: Kevin Sutter <kwsutter@gmail.com>
> > >>>>> >To: dev@openjpa.apache.org; Mark Struberg <struberg@yahoo.de>
> > >>>>> >Sent: Monday, 18 November 2013, 15:35
> > >>>>> >Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache OpenJPA-2.3.0
> > >>>>> >
> > >>>>> >
> > >>>>> >
> > >>>>> >Hi Mark,
> > >>>>> >I'm not entirely clear on what aspects are blockers for
the vote
> or
> > >>>>> not...  But, I really would like to have the javadoc available
> > before I
> > >>>>> vote.  I found an issue with the last OpenJPA release we did
based
> > on the
> > >>>>> contents of the javadoc.  We decided to let it go with the
> > expectation that
> > >>>>> it was cleared up for the next release.  I want to verify that
this
> > >>>>> particular issue was resolved and that we didn't introduce
any
> > others.
> > >>>>> Thanks for your patience.
> > >>>>> >
> > >>>>> >Kevin
> > >>>>> >
> > >>>>> >
> > >>>>> >
> > >>>>> >
> > >>>>> >On Sun, Nov 17, 2013 at 11:54 PM, Mark Struberg <
> struberg@yahoo.de>
> > >>>>> wrote:
> > >>>>> >
> > >>>>> >Hi Albert, all!
> > >>>>> >>
> > >>>>> >>
> > >>>>> >>* As for the key: you can find my key in
> > >>>>> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/openwebbeans/trunk/KEYS
> > >>>>> >>As the release is correctly signed this is not a blocker
I think.
> > Will
> > >>>>> of course add my key to openjpa as well now.
> > >>>>> >>
> > >>>>> >>* For the tag name: it's just a tag. Feel free to rename
the tag.
> > This
> > >>>>> does not affect the sources which is btw the only thing an
ASF
> > release
> > >>>>> constitutes of.
> > >>>>> >>
> > >>>>> >>
> > >>>>> >>* Notice: yikes, how long did this not get fixed? Reminds
me that
> > we
> > >>>>> should go for 2014 immediately and do a check on all my projects
in
> > january
> > >>>>> again. Is this really a blocker? Not sure myself.
> > >>>>> >>
> > >>>>> >>
> > >>>>> >>* OPENJPA-2335 sorry, my fault. Did reopen it, fixed
it in branch
> > and
> > >>>>> did not close it. Done now. It's in the release notes, so all
is
> > fine.
> > >>>>> >>
> > >>>>> >>* OPENJPA-2450 No idea why this got assigned as 'fixed
in' 2.3.0.
> > >>>>> Removed it from there. This JIRA even got created after I started
> > with the
> > >>>>> release process.
> > >>>>> >>
> > >>>>> >>
> > >>>>> >>anything left?
> > >>>>> >>
> > >>>>> >>
> > >>>>> >>
> > >>>>> >>Gonna create the JavaDoc and try to push it from my
office
> > computer. If
> > >>>>> this doesn't work (firewall rules) then I try and push it in
the
> > afternoon.
> > >>>>> >>
> > >>>>> >>
> > >>>>> >>No worries, if you feel there are still blocker in
there then I
> try
> > >>>>> another respin within this week. In any case, thanks for the
> review,
> > Albert!
> > >>>>> >>
> > >>>>> >>
> > >>>>> >>
> > >>>>> >>After the VOTE finally succeeds I gonna apply all my
changes from
> > >>>>> branch to trunk.
> > >>>>> >>
> > >>>>> >>
> > >>>>> >>txs and LieGrue,
> > >>>>> >>strub
> > >>>>> >>
> > >>>>> >>
> > >>>>> >>
> > >>>>> >>
> > >>>>> >>----- Original Message -----
> > >>>>> >> From: Albert Lee <allee8285@gmail.com>
> > >>>>> >> To: open-jpa-dev <dev@openjpa.apache.org>; Mark
Struberg <
> > >>>>> struberg@yahoo.de>
> > >>>>> >> Cc:
> > >>>>> >> Sent: Sunday, 17 November 2013, 3:42
> > >>>>> >> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache OpenJPA-2.3.0
> > >>>>> >>
> > >>>>> >> Mark,
> > >>>>> >>
> > >>>>> >> Thanks you for putting up the release.
> > >>>>> >>
> > >>>>> >> -1 for the following observations:
> > >>>>> >>
> > >>>>> >> * I don't see your signature in
> > svn.apache.org/repos/asf/openjpa/KEYSfile.
> > >>>>> >> See http://openjpa.apache.org/release-setup.html -
Create a GPG
> > key
> > >>>>> - step
> > >>>>> >> 4.
> > >>>>> >> * should the tags/openjpa-parent-2.3.0 be tags/2.3.0
> > >>>>> >> * From
> > >>>>>
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OPENJPA/fixforversion/12319463
> > ,
> > >>>>> >> there are still 1 JIRA (OPENJPA-2450) "in Progress"
and 1 JIRA
> > >>>>> >> (OPENJPA-2335) in "Reopened" state. These need to
be resolved.
> > >>>>> >> * In RELEASE-NOTES.html,
> > >>>>> >> ** "Notices" section, the copyright should be "Copyright
> > >>>>> >> 2006,2013 The
> > >>>>> >> Apache Software Foundation".
> > >>>>> >> ** End of the document, the copyright should be "Copyright
(C)
> > >>>>> 2006,2012
> > >>>>> >> Apache Software Foundation. Licensed under Apache
License 2.0."
> > >>>>> >> * openjpa-project/src/doc/manual/manual.html needs
to update the
> > >>>>> copyright
> > >>>>> >> to 2013
> > >>>>> >>         <title>Apache OpenJPA 2.3 User's Guide</title>
> > >>>>> >>         <copyright>
> > >>>>> >>             <year>2006-2013</year>
> > >>>>> >>             <holder>The Apache Software Foundation</holder>
> > >>>>> >> * Can you post the javadoc url for viewing?
> > >>>>> >>
> > >>>>> >> Sorry for the -1 vote.
> > >>>>> >> Albert Lee.
> > >>>>> >>
> > >>>>> >>
> > >>>>> >> On Wed, Nov 13, 2013 at 3:41 PM, Mark Struberg <
> struberg@yahoo.de
> > >
> > >>>>> wrote:
> > >>>>> >>
> > >>>>> >>>  Hi!
> > >>>>> >>>
> > >>>>> >>>  I did prepare the OpenJPA-2.3.0 release yesterday
and like to
> > call
> > >>>>> a VOTE
> > >>>>> >>>  on it.
> > >>>>> >>>  Just did some in depth testing with it on a few
private
> > projects and
> > >>>>> >>>  Romain and David did run TomEE tests (thus TCKed)
on it.
> > >>>>> >>>
> > >>>>> >>>  The staging repository can be found here:
> > >>>>> >>>
> > >>>>>
> > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheopenjpa-117/
> > >>>>> >>>
> > >>>>> >>>  Here is the source release zip
> > >>>>> >>>
> > >>>>> >>>
> > >>>>> >>
> > >>>>>
> >
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheopenjpa-117/org/apache/openjpa/openjpa-parent/2.3.0/openjpa-parent-2.3.0-source-release.zip
> > >>>>> >>>  sha1: e36ce9727ab4b37a31411ca723bb37b502a00d38
> > >>>>> >>>
> > >>>>> >>>
> > >>>>> >>>  [+1] ship it!
> > >>>>> >>>  [+0] meh, don't care
> > >>>>> >>>  [-1] stop, becasue ${reason}
> > >>>>> >>>
> > >>>>> >>>  The VOTE is open for 72h.
> > >>>>> >>>
> > >>>>> >>>
> > >>>>> >>>  Please note that I did not yet push the site.
Will do this
> once
> > the
> > >>>>> VOTE
> > >>>>> >>>  succeeds and the staging gets closed.
> > >>>>> >>>
> > >>>>> >>>
> > >>>>> >>>
> > >>>>> >>>  regards,
> > >>>>> >>>  the OpenJPA Team
> > >>>>> >>>
> > >>>>> >>
> > >>>>> >>
> > >>>>> >>
> > >>>>> >> --
> > >>>>> >> Albert Lee.
> > >>>>> >>
> > >>>>> >>
> > >>>>> >
> > >>>>> >
> > >>>>> >
> > >>>>> >
> > >>>>> >
> > >>>>>
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >
> > >
> >
>



-- 
*Rick Curtis*

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message