openjpa-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Albert Lee <allee8...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache OpenJPA-2.3.0
Date Thu, 21 Nov 2013 21:44:23 GMT
+1.  Thanks for doing the release work.

Albert.


On Thu, Nov 21, 2013 at 9:56 AM, Mark Struberg <struberg@yahoo.de> wrote:

> Seems I was right. Even in the US here was a ruling a few years ago that a
> 'till' license year is only effective if it is an 'explicit' copyright
> owner change. Otherwise the last copyright owner remains unchanged. We do
> not 'loose' our copyrights by not updating the year. This is also d'accord
> with the infro from e.g. [1].
> Thus not a show stopper.
>
> I've also added my KEY now [2].
>
>
> LieGrue,
> strub
>
>
> [1] http://markmail.org/message/brcxq7fw3krsnvrm
>
> [2] https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/openjpa/KEYS
>
>
>
> >________________________________
> > From: Mark Struberg <struberg@yahoo.de>
> >To: Kevin Sutter <kwsutter@gmail.com>; openjpa-dev <
> dev@openjpa.apache.org>
> >Sent: Thursday, 21 November 2013, 16:35
> >Subject: Re: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache OpenJPA-2.3.0
> >
> >
> >whoops, sorry did mea to send the previous mail to the list. But you
> know, mobile phones ...
> >
> >I'm not yet sure about the ref date. But as this is still not changed in
> many projects I hardly think it's a blocker.
> >From a pure law pov it makes no difference for EU and in the US it is imo
> only a problem if we explcitly abandon the marks.
> >
> >We should in any case update the docs in our trunk. That might be enough.
> Will check the mailing  about the copyright date being a showstopper to be
> sure.
> >
> >LieGrue,
> >strub
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >>________________________________
> >
> >> From: Kevin Sutter <kwsutter@gmail.com>
> >>To: Mark Struberg <struberg@yahoo.de>
> >>Sent: Thursday, 21 November 2013, 16:14
> >>Subject: Re: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache OpenJPA-2.3.0
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>Thanks, Mark.  The javadoc looks good.  What did you find out about the
> copyright dates?  Is the 2012 reference (vs 2013) a blocker?
> >>
> >>Kevin
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>On Thu, Nov 21, 2013 at 9:05 AM, Mark Struberg <struberg@yahoo.de>
> wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >>>
> >>>no need to restart. the 72h are only a min length.
> >>>
> >>>LG m
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>------------------------------
> >>>Kevin Sutter schrieb am Do., 21. Nov 2013 15:41 MEZ:
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>>Hi Mark,
> >>>>Thanks for the javadoc.  I'll take a look shortly...
> >>>>
> >>>>Question on the release process...  Since we are over the 72 hour
> window,
> >>>>do we need to cancel the first vote and start over?  I don't know how
> picky
> >>>>the process is in this regard, but I think we've had to do that in the
> past
> >>>>with "slow votes"...
> >>>>
> >>>>Thanks, Kevin
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>On Thu, Nov 21, 2013 at 8:00 AM, Mark Struberg <struberg@yahoo.de>
> wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Hi folks!
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Sorry that it took me so long. I've now generated the JavaDocs from
> the
> >>>>> tag and uploaded it to my people account
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> http://people.apache.org/~struberg/openjpa/openjpa-parent-2.3.0-javadoc.jar
> >>>>>
> >>>>> txs and LieGrue,
> >>>>> strub
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> >________________________________
> >>>>> > From: Mark Struberg <struberg@yahoo.de>
> >>>>> >To: Kevin Sutter <kwsutter@gmail.com>; "dev@openjpa.apache.org"
<
> >>>>> dev@openjpa.apache.org>
> >>>>> >Sent: Monday, 18 November 2013, 17:02
> >>>>> >Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache OpenJPA-2.3.0
> >>>>> >
> >>>>> >
> >>>>> >Sure I understand. Just being a bit under stress @ $dayjob.
Will
> try to
> >>>>> ship this in the evening.
> >>>>> >
> >>>>> >LieGrue,
> >>>>> >strub
> >>>>> >
> >>>>> >
> >>>>> >
> >>>>> >
> >>>>> >________________________________
> >>>>> >
> >>>>> > From: Kevin Sutter <kwsutter@gmail.com>
> >>>>> >To: dev@openjpa.apache.org; Mark Struberg <struberg@yahoo.de>
> >>>>> >Sent: Monday, 18 November 2013, 15:35
> >>>>> >Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache OpenJPA-2.3.0
> >>>>> >
> >>>>> >
> >>>>> >
> >>>>> >Hi Mark,
> >>>>> >I'm not entirely clear on what aspects are blockers for the
vote or
> >>>>> not...  But, I really would like to have the javadoc available
> before I
> >>>>> vote.  I found an issue with the last OpenJPA release we did based
> on the
> >>>>> contents of the javadoc.  We decided to let it go with the
> expectation that
> >>>>> it was cleared up for the next release.  I want to verify that this
> >>>>> particular issue was resolved and that we didn't introduce any
> others.
> >>>>> Thanks for your patience.
> >>>>> >
> >>>>> >Kevin
> >>>>> >
> >>>>> >
> >>>>> >
> >>>>> >
> >>>>> >On Sun, Nov 17, 2013 at 11:54 PM, Mark Struberg <struberg@yahoo.de>
> >>>>> wrote:
> >>>>> >
> >>>>> >Hi Albert, all!
> >>>>> >>
> >>>>> >>
> >>>>> >>* As for the key: you can find my key in
> >>>>> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/openwebbeans/trunk/KEYS
> >>>>> >>As the release is correctly signed this is not a blocker
I think.
> Will
> >>>>> of course add my key to openjpa as well now.
> >>>>> >>
> >>>>> >>* For the tag name: it's just a tag. Feel free to rename
the tag.
> This
> >>>>> does not affect the sources which is btw the only thing an ASF
> release
> >>>>> constitutes of.
> >>>>> >>
> >>>>> >>
> >>>>> >>* Notice: yikes, how long did this not get fixed? Reminds
me that
> we
> >>>>> should go for 2014 immediately and do a check on all my projects
in
> january
> >>>>> again. Is this really a blocker? Not sure myself.
> >>>>> >>
> >>>>> >>
> >>>>> >>* OPENJPA-2335 sorry, my fault. Did reopen it, fixed it
in branch
> and
> >>>>> did not close it. Done now. It's in the release notes, so all is
> fine.
> >>>>> >>
> >>>>> >>* OPENJPA-2450 No idea why this got assigned as 'fixed in'
2.3.0.
> >>>>> Removed it from there. This JIRA even got created after I started
> with the
> >>>>> release process.
> >>>>> >>
> >>>>> >>
> >>>>> >>anything left?
> >>>>> >>
> >>>>> >>
> >>>>> >>
> >>>>> >>Gonna create the JavaDoc and try to push it from my office
> computer. If
> >>>>> this doesn't work (firewall rules) then I try and push it in the
> afternoon.
> >>>>> >>
> >>>>> >>
> >>>>> >>No worries, if you feel there are still blocker in there
then I try
> >>>>> another respin within this week. In any case, thanks for the review,
> Albert!
> >>>>> >>
> >>>>> >>
> >>>>> >>
> >>>>> >>After the VOTE finally succeeds I gonna apply all my changes
from
> >>>>> branch to trunk.
> >>>>> >>
> >>>>> >>
> >>>>> >>txs and LieGrue,
> >>>>> >>strub
> >>>>> >>
> >>>>> >>
> >>>>> >>
> >>>>> >>
> >>>>> >>----- Original Message -----
> >>>>> >> From: Albert Lee <allee8285@gmail.com>
> >>>>> >> To: open-jpa-dev <dev@openjpa.apache.org>; Mark Struberg
<
> >>>>> struberg@yahoo.de>
> >>>>> >> Cc:
> >>>>> >> Sent: Sunday, 17 November 2013, 3:42
> >>>>> >> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache OpenJPA-2.3.0
> >>>>> >>
> >>>>> >> Mark,
> >>>>> >>
> >>>>> >> Thanks you for putting up the release.
> >>>>> >>
> >>>>> >> -1 for the following observations:
> >>>>> >>
> >>>>> >> * I don't see your signature in
> svn.apache.org/repos/asf/openjpa/KEYSfile.
> >>>>> >> See http://openjpa.apache.org/release-setup.html - Create
a GPG
> key
> >>>>> - step
> >>>>> >> 4.
> >>>>> >> * should the tags/openjpa-parent-2.3.0 be tags/2.3.0
> >>>>> >> * From
> >>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OPENJPA/fixforversion/12319463
> ,
> >>>>> >> there are still 1 JIRA (OPENJPA-2450) "in Progress" and
1 JIRA
> >>>>> >> (OPENJPA-2335) in "Reopened" state. These need to be resolved.
> >>>>> >> * In RELEASE-NOTES.html,
> >>>>> >> ** "Notices" section, the copyright should be "Copyright
> >>>>> >> 2006,2013 The
> >>>>> >> Apache Software Foundation".
> >>>>> >> ** End of the document, the copyright should be "Copyright
(C)
> >>>>> 2006,2012
> >>>>> >> Apache Software Foundation. Licensed under Apache License
2.0."
> >>>>> >> * openjpa-project/src/doc/manual/manual.html needs to update
the
> >>>>> copyright
> >>>>> >> to 2013
> >>>>> >>         <title>Apache OpenJPA 2.3 User's Guide</title>
> >>>>> >>         <copyright>
> >>>>> >>             <year>2006-2013</year>
> >>>>> >>             <holder>The Apache Software Foundation</holder>
> >>>>> >> * Can you post the javadoc url for viewing?
> >>>>> >>
> >>>>> >> Sorry for the -1 vote.
> >>>>> >> Albert Lee.
> >>>>> >>
> >>>>> >>
> >>>>> >> On Wed, Nov 13, 2013 at 3:41 PM, Mark Struberg <struberg@yahoo.de
> >
> >>>>> wrote:
> >>>>> >>
> >>>>> >>>  Hi!
> >>>>> >>>
> >>>>> >>>  I did prepare the OpenJPA-2.3.0 release yesterday
and like to
> call
> >>>>> a VOTE
> >>>>> >>>  on it.
> >>>>> >>>  Just did some in depth testing with it on a few private
> projects and
> >>>>> >>>  Romain and David did run TomEE tests (thus TCKed)
on it.
> >>>>> >>>
> >>>>> >>>  The staging repository can be found here:
> >>>>> >>>
> >>>>>
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheopenjpa-117/
> >>>>> >>>
> >>>>> >>>  Here is the source release zip
> >>>>> >>>
> >>>>> >>>
> >>>>> >>
> >>>>>
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheopenjpa-117/org/apache/openjpa/openjpa-parent/2.3.0/openjpa-parent-2.3.0-source-release.zip
> >>>>> >>>  sha1: e36ce9727ab4b37a31411ca723bb37b502a00d38
> >>>>> >>>
> >>>>> >>>
> >>>>> >>>  [+1] ship it!
> >>>>> >>>  [+0] meh, don't care
> >>>>> >>>  [-1] stop, becasue ${reason}
> >>>>> >>>
> >>>>> >>>  The VOTE is open for 72h.
> >>>>> >>>
> >>>>> >>>
> >>>>> >>>  Please note that I did not yet push the site. Will
do this once
> the
> >>>>> VOTE
> >>>>> >>>  succeeds and the staging gets closed.
> >>>>> >>>
> >>>>> >>>
> >>>>> >>>
> >>>>> >>>  regards,
> >>>>> >>>  the OpenJPA Team
> >>>>> >>>
> >>>>> >>
> >>>>> >>
> >>>>> >>
> >>>>> >> --
> >>>>> >> Albert Lee.
> >>>>> >>
> >>>>> >>
> >>>>> >
> >>>>> >
> >>>>> >
> >>>>> >
> >>>>> >
> >>>>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >
> >
>



-- 
Albert Lee.

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message