openjpa-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Mark Struberg <strub...@yahoo.de>
Subject Re: release preparations for 2.3.0
Date Sat, 02 Nov 2013 13:01:14 GMT
DONE!

FYI upfront.

Here is the staging repo link for the release
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheopenjpa-055/

Will write a proper vote mail later today.

LieGrue,
strub




----- Original Message -----
> From: Mark Struberg <struberg@yahoo.de>
> To: "dev@openjpa.apache.org" <dev@openjpa.apache.org>; Mark Struberg <struberg@yahoo.de>
> Cc: 
> Sent: Saturday, 2 November 2013, 11:20
> Subject: Re: release preparations for 2.3.0
> 
> damn, failed at site deploy :(
> 
> 
> distributionManagement.site.url=scp://people.apache.org/home/${site.deploy.user.name}/public_html/openjpa/2.3.0/staging-site/.
> 
> [INFO] Unsupported protocol: 'scp' for site deployment to 
> distributionManagement.site.url=scp://people.apache.org/home/${site.deploy.user.name}/public_html/openjpa/2.3.0/staging-site/.
> 
> 
> will do the rest of the release process manually and fix this for the next 
> release iteration
> 
> LieGrue,
> strub
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> ----- Original Message -----
>>  From: Mark Struberg <struberg@yahoo.de>
>>  To: "dev@openjpa.apache.org" <dev@openjpa.apache.org>; Mark 
> Struberg <struberg@yahoo.de>
>>  Cc: 
>>  Sent: Saturday, 2 November 2013, 9:58
>>  Subject: Re: release preparations for 2.3.0
>> 
>>  Wohuuu, release:prepare went through finally. Now off for running the final 
> 
>>  steps.
>> 
>>  We need to add a few things to our documentation
>> 
>>  * JAI is needed for docbook. We should add the installation instructions to 
> our 
>>  release prerequisites.
>>  * we should remove -DskipTests from our release instructions. There were a 
> few 
>>  tests which failed during release and which are now fixed.
>> 
>>  LieGrue,
>>  strub
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>>  ----- Original Message -----
>>>   From: Mark Struberg <struberg@yahoo.de>
>>>   To: "dev@openjpa.apache.org" <dev@openjpa.apache.org>
>>>   Cc: 
>>>   Sent: Wednesday, 30 October 2013, 23:10
>>>   Subject: Re: release preparations for 2.3.0
>>> 
>>>   I finally installed jai. damnit...
>>> 
>>>   Now I am almost through. Just getting this error now
>>> 
>>>     <testcase time="2.124" 
>>> 
>> 
> classname="org.apache.openjpa.integration.validation.TestConstraints" 
>>>   name="testNullConstraintIgnored">
>>>       <failure message="Caught unexpected exception = 
>>>   &lt;openjpa-2.3.0-r422266:1537254M fatal store error&gt; 
>>>   org.apache.openjpa.persistence.RollbackException: Table/View 
>>>   &apos;OPENJPA_SEQUENCE_TABLE&apos; does not exist
>>>   . {SELECT SEQUENCE_VALUE FROM OPENJPA_SEQUENCE_TABLE WHERE ID = ? 
> FOR 
>>>   UPDATE WITH RR} [code=20000, state=42X05]" 
>>> 
>> 
> type="junit.framework.AssertionFailedError">junit.framework.AssertionFailedError:

> 
>> 
>>>   Caught unexpected except
>>>   ion = &lt;openjpa-2.3.0-r422266:1537254M fatal store error&gt; 
> 
>>>   org.apache.openjpa.persistence.RollbackException: Table/View 
>>>   &apos;OPENJPA_SEQUENCE_TABLE&apos; does not exist. 
> {SELECT 
>>>   SEQUENCE_VALUE FROM OPENJPA_SEQUENCE
>>>   _TABLE WHERE ID = ? FOR UPDATE WITH RR} [code=20000, state=42X05]
>>>           at junit.framework.Assert.fail(Assert.java:47)
>>>           at 
>>> 
>> 
> org.apache.openjpa.integration.validation.TestConstraints.testNullConstraintIgnored(TestConstraints.java:256)
>>>           at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method)
>>>           at 
>>> 
>> 
> sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:57)
>>>           at 
>>> 
>> 
> sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:43)
>>>           at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:606)
>>>           at junit.framework.TestCase.runTest(TestCase.java:154)
>>>           at 
>>> 
>> 
> org.apache.openjpa.persistence.test.AbstractPersistenceTestCase.runTest(AbstractPersistenceTestCase.java:579)
>>>           at junit.framework.TestCase.runBare(TestCase.java:127)
>>>           at 
>>> 
>> 
> org.apache.openjpa.persistence.test.AbstractPersistenceTestCase.runBare(AbstractPersistenceTestCase.java:566)
>>>           at 
>>> 
>> 
> org.apache.openjpa.persistence.test.AbstractPersistenceTestCase.runBare(AbstractPersistenceTestCase.java:542)
>>>           at junit.framework.TestResult$1.protect(TestResult.java:106)
>>> 
>>>   The following should bring you there:
>>> 
>>>   mvn  -P apache-release,test-derby,bval,test-derbymem clean install
>>> 
>>> 
>>>   Anyone has a plan what's wrong? Too tired for searching today 
> alread.
>>>   Will continue tomorrow evening.
>>> 
>>> 
>>>   LieGrue,
>>>   strub
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>>   ----- Original Message -----
>>>>    From: Mark Struberg <struberg@yahoo.de>
>>>>    To: "dev@openjpa.apache.org" 
> <dev@openjpa.apache.org>; 
>>  Mark 
>>>   Struberg <struberg@yahoo.de>
>>>>    Cc: 
>>>>    Sent: Wednesday, 30 October 2013, 21:15
>>>>    Subject: Re: release preparations for 2.3.0
>>>> 
>>>>    And another one
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>>    Could not find artifact com.sun:jai_core:jar:1.1.3
>>>> 
>>>>    we should not recommend creating docbx during release. This does 
> just 
>>  not 
>>>   work 
>>>>    out of the box but requires non ALv2 stuff manually installed on 
> a 
>>  box.
>>>>    We can still create all the javadocs and documentation from the 
> tag 
>>  later 
>>>   on 
>>>>    after the release went fine.
>>>> 
>>>>    LieGrue,
>>>>    strub
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>>    ----- Original Message -----
>>>>>     From: Mark Struberg <struberg@yahoo.de>
>>>>>     To: "dev@openjpa.apache.org" 
>>  <dev@openjpa.apache.org>; 
>>>   Mark 
>>>>    Struberg <struberg@yahoo.de>
>>>>>     Cc: 
>>>>>     Sent: Wednesday, 30 October 2013, 16:41
>>>>>     Subject: Re: release preparations for 2.3.0
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>>     just FYI.
>>>>> 
>>>>>     I'm still fighting with the javadoc-maven-plugin. Will 
> now 
>>>   continue 
>>>>    with 
>>>>>     trying to create a cleansetup.
>>>>> 
>>>>>     The current problem I face is that the aggregate javadoc 
> needs 
>>  the 
>>>>    dependencies 
>>>>>     built already. Means creating the javadoc upfront does not 
> work 
>>  once 
>>>   you 
>>>>>     increase the project version (or build completely clean in 
>>  offline 
>>>   mode). I 
>>>>    have 
>>>>>     isolated the issue and am currently working on a solution 
> which I 
>>  will 
>>> 
>>>>    later 
>>>>>     also commit to trunk (once all stuff is finally working as I 
> like 
>>  it).
>>>>> 
>>>>>     LieGrue,
>>>>>     strub
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>>     PS: I'm in IRC if somebody likes to join the pain ;)
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>>>     ________________________________
>>>>> 
>>>>>>      From: Mark Struberg <struberg@yahoo.de>
>>>>>>     To: "dev@openjpa.apache.org" 
>>>   <dev@openjpa.apache.org> 
>>>>>>     Sent: Tuesday, 29 October 2013, 22:32
>>>>>>     Subject: Re: release preparations for 2.3.0
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>>     seems I will fix all the checkstyle related stuff later. 
> This 
>> 
>>>   needs 
>>>>    some 
>>>>>     serious cleanup.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>>     We should move all the stuff in our root pom.xml into an 
> own 
>>>>    parent/pom.xml 
>>>>>     and add a checkstyle module. Then we can add the checkstyle 
> rules 
>>  as 
>>>>    dependency 
>>>>>     and do not need to carry around all the stuff via absolute 
> file 
>>  paths.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>>     LieGrue,
>>>>>>     strub
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>>     ----- Original Message -----
>>>>>>>      From: Rick Curtis <curtisr7@gmail.com>
>>>>>>>      To: dev@openjpa.apache.org
>>>>>>>      Cc: 
>>>>>>>      Sent: Tuesday, 29 October 2013, 19:18
>>>>>>>      Subject: Re: release preparations for 2.3.0
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>      +1 on updating the checkstyle
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>      On Tue, Oct 29, 2013 at 12:54 PM, Mark Struberg 
>>>>>     <struberg@yahoo.de> wrote:
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>       I've already removed all unused imports in 
> 
>>  2.3.x and 
>>> 
>>>>    trunk.
>>>>>>>>       Will remove all tabs and replace them with 4 
>>  characters 
>>>>    tonight as 
>>>>>     well.
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>       We might also activate the 
> maven-checkstyle-plugin 
>>  to 
>>>   make 
>>>>    sure 
>>>>>     this
>>>>>>>>       doesn't get worse in the future.
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>       LieGrue,
>>>>>>>>       strub
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>       ----- Original Message -----
>>>>>>>>       > From: Mark Struberg 
> <struberg@yahoo.de>
>>>>>>>>       > To: openjpa-dev 
> <dev@openjpa.apache.org>
>>>>>>>>       > Cc:
>>>>>>>>       > Sent: Tuesday, 29 October 2013, 9:27
>>>>>>>>       > Subject: release preparations for 2.3.0
>>>>>>>>       >
>>>>>>>>       > Hi!
>>>>>>>>       >
>>>>>>>>       > Could you please walk through the 
> unresolved 
>>>>    OpenJPA-2.3.0 
>>>>>     issues and
>>>>>>>>       set those
>>>>>>>>       > who you doubt should be fixed already to 
>>>>    'resolved'?
>>>>>>>>       >
>>>>>>>>       >
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>> 
>>> 
>> 
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=project%20%3D%20OPENJPA%20AND%20fixVersion%20%3D%20%222.3.0%22%20AND%20resolution%20%3D%20Unresolved%20ORDER%20BY%20due%20ASC%2C%20priority%20DESC%2C%20created%20ASC
>>>>>>>>       >
>>>>>>>>       > I hope to start with the actual release 
> task 
>>  either 
>>> 
>>>>    tonight 
>>>>>     or 
>>>>>>>      tomorrow
>>>>>>>>       morning.
>>>>>>>>       > Means I gonna  send another mail in 15 
> hours 
>>  and 
>>>   then 
>>>>    will 
>>>>>     transit the
>>>>>>>>       still
>>>>>>>>       > unresolved issues to 2.4.0.
>>>>>>>>       >
>>>>>>>>       > There is also another thing which I like 
> to 
>>  do: 
>>>   finally 
>>>>    get 
>>>>>     rid of all
>>>>>>>>       the bad
>>>>>>>>       > tabs and unused imports in 2.3.x and 
> trunk.
>>>>>>>>       > See OPENJPA-2200. I will _not_ change any 
> 
>>  lines 
>>>   other 
>>>>    than 
>>>>>     tabs and
>>>>>>>>       unused
>>>>>>>>       > imports so far.
>>>>>>>>       > Patches should thus still apply fine even 
> 
>>  across 
>>>   older 
>>>>>     versions.
>>>>>>>>       >
>>>>>>>>       > LieGrue,
>>>>>>>>       > strub
>>>>>>>>       >
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>      -- 
>>>>>>>      *Rick Curtis*
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>> 
>>> 
>> 
> 

Mime
View raw message