openjpa-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Rick Curtis (JIRA)" <j...@apache.org>
Subject [jira] [Reopened] (OPENJPA-2171) asm should be optional
Date Thu, 03 Oct 2013 20:30:41 GMT

     [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OPENJPA-2171?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]

Rick Curtis reopened OPENJPA-2171:
----------------------------------


Hey guys, question about this one. I was doing some testing with Java 7 + ASM 4.0 and found
that this change negatively affected my scenario. I believe that Kevin also mentioned this
in OPENJPA-2283, but I don't know if you guys had the time to look through that info. The
net of it is that if I change my source level from 1.6 -> 1.7 and the asm dependency to
4.0 I get the same exception as documented in 2283. If I revert AsmAdapter back to pre 1241719,
everything works fine. 

I think this is something that should get addressed prior to cutting a 2.3.0 release.

> asm should be optional
> ----------------------
>
>                 Key: OPENJPA-2171
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OPENJPA-2171
>             Project: OpenJPA
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>            Reporter: Romain Manni-Bucau
>            Assignee: Mark Struberg
>              Labels: 2.3.0-candidate
>             Fix For: 2.3.0
>
>         Attachments: ASM.patch
>
>
> openjpa uses since some versions asm but in tomee for instance we use a shade (through
the xbean one org.apache.xbean:xbean-asm-shaded to avoid classloading/version issues with
webapps/applications.
> it can be nice if openjpa can provide us an issue to this because we really don't want
to provide asm in our binaries.
> solutions can be to use the xbean shade, give us an interface to implement or to try
several implementation (xbean shade, asm,...) by reflection



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.1#6144)

Mime
View raw message