openjpa-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Kevin Sutter (JIRA)" <j...@apache.org>
Subject [jira] [Commented] (OPENJPA-2171) asm should be optional
Date Mon, 14 Oct 2013 14:13:41 GMT

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OPENJPA-2171?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13794134#comment-13794134
] 

Kevin Sutter commented on OPENJPA-2171:
---------------------------------------

Hi Mark,
Since Java 8 is just around the corner, we will have customers attempting to use Java 8 with
their Entity classes.  And, they are bound to have issues...  :-)  So, it's nice to allow
our testcases to be built with a different class version than what OpenJPA runtime is built
with.  We had originally put this in due to the Java 6 / Java 7 requirement.  We might as
well leave it for the Java 7 / Java 8 requirement.  Thanks.



> asm should be optional
> ----------------------
>
>                 Key: OPENJPA-2171
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OPENJPA-2171
>             Project: OpenJPA
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>            Reporter: Romain Manni-Bucau
>            Assignee: Mark Struberg
>              Labels: 2.3.0-candidate
>             Fix For: 2.3.0
>
>         Attachments: ASM.patch, kernel.patch
>
>
> openjpa uses since some versions asm but in tomee for instance we use a shade (through
the xbean one org.apache.xbean:xbean-asm-shaded to avoid classloading/version issues with
webapps/applications.
> it can be nice if openjpa can provide us an issue to this because we really don't want
to provide asm in our binaries.
> solutions can be to use the xbean shade, give us an interface to implement or to try
several implementation (xbean shade, asm,...) by reflection



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.1#6144)

Mime
View raw message