openjpa-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Mark Struberg (JIRA)" <j...@apache.org>
Subject [jira] [Commented] (OPENJPA-2171) asm should be optional
Date Sat, 12 Oct 2013 17:56:41 GMT

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OPENJPA-2171?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13793428#comment-13793428
] 

Mark Struberg commented on OPENJPA-2171:
----------------------------------------

We can do this of course, and fill it with the java.version by default. But I'm not quite
sure what the benefit would be. For doing our release we will still use java6 for some time.
And for running all the build in our CI the single property is fine enough. I have no objection
to introduce it though - just like to verify if it's really useful before we have another
property to maintain ;)

> asm should be optional
> ----------------------
>
>                 Key: OPENJPA-2171
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OPENJPA-2171
>             Project: OpenJPA
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>            Reporter: Romain Manni-Bucau
>            Assignee: Mark Struberg
>              Labels: 2.3.0-candidate
>             Fix For: 2.3.0
>
>         Attachments: ASM.patch, kernel.patch
>
>
> openjpa uses since some versions asm but in tomee for instance we use a shade (through
the xbean one org.apache.xbean:xbean-asm-shaded to avoid classloading/version issues with
webapps/applications.
> it can be nice if openjpa can provide us an issue to this because we really don't want
to provide asm in our binaries.
> solutions can be to use the xbean shade, give us an interface to implement or to try
several implementation (xbean shade, asm,...) by reflection



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.1#6144)

Mime
View raw message